Britain's biggest technology magazine
SEARCH FOR: IN:
Guest  Level 00    Register Log in

News 

[Processors]
Tuesday 29th April 2008
AMD to debut 45nm quad-cores this quarter 12:18PM, Tuesday 29th April 2008
AMD is gearing up to release its first desktop 45nm quad-core Phenom this quarter, with the next two set to follow towards the end of year.

The chip company's first step will be to update its Phenom X4 9750 with a 45nm version of the chip, according to various reports.

Among the big benefits AMD is apparently touting a huge drop in power consumption, from 125W to around 95W. Clockspeeds will also rise from 2.4GHz, to somewhere between 2.5GHz and 2.8GHz, accompanied by a boost in L3 cache from 2MB to 6MB.

The Phenom X4 9850 and 9950 (scheduled for release in June) also need to start looking over their shoulder, with sources suggesting they'll be replaced with 45nm equivalents sometime before January 2009, also bolstered by three times the L3 cache and a similar drop in power consumption.

The low power front is also set to be catered for with a 65nm triple core 2.2GHz Phenom X3 taking its place alongside the existing 8450 and 8650 in the third quarter. 45nm low-power quad-cores, currently codenamed Propus, are expected to emerge in the first half of 2009.

Submit to: Digg  |  Slashdot  |  Del.icio.us  |  Technorati

Related News


Dell Latitude D531 Base AMD Sempron 3600+ 2.0GHz
AMD Sempron Mobile, 2 Ghz, 1024 MB, 80 GB
Toshiba Satellite Pro L300D-11N AMD Athlon X2 Dua
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual-Core, 1.9 Ghz, 2048 MB, 160 GB
Toshiba Satellite Pro A210-18M AMD Turion 64 X2 T
AMD Turion 64 Mobile, 2 Ghz, 2048 MB, 250 GB
Toshiba L350D-12M AMD Athlon X2 Dual-Core TK-57 1
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual-Core, 1.9 Ghz, 2048 MB, 120 GB

Compare Broadband
Broadband?
Compare 50+ packages
Enter your postcode below:
Powered by:
Top 10 Broadband
Bookstore Top 5

Columns

Under Development: Code of misconduct

While one of his customers grapples with the English language, David Robinson almost comes unstuck thanks to a sticky problem concerning barcodes. › See full Opinion