Labs

Core: Venice

Frequency: 2GHz

Socket: 939

Process: 90nm

Cores: One

Instructions: MMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, x86-64

Multiplier: 10x

External bus: 200MHz

Effective FSB speed: 2x 1,000MHz (HyperTransport)

Level 1 cache: 128KB

Level 2 cache: 512KB

Intel launched its 64-bit processors in 2005, but AMD has been trumpeting 64-bit

ADVERTISEMENT

computing since 2003. With or without Windows XP Professional x64, Athlon 64 processors are powerful and relatively cheap.

AMD is well known for changing processor cores on a regular basis. We tested the Athlon 64 3000+, 3200+ and 3800+ made using the latest Venice core, and a 3500+ using the older Newcastle core for comparison. The chief advantages of the Venice core are a more efficient 90nm process and the addition of the SSE3 instruction set. Our tests revealed the disadvantage of the older core. The Newcastle 3500+ was closer in performance to the Venice 3200+ than to the 3800+ so, unless you find a Newcastle processor on sale for a low price, we recommend you get a Venice chip.

AMD's processors are easy to overclock. Even using the standard AMD cooler, we managed to overclock the £129 Athlon 64 3200+ from 2GHz to 2.3GHz, giving it performance on a par with the £234 Athlon 64 3800+. It scored 94 in our video-editing test before overclocking and 108 afterwards