Netgear R6300 review
A promising start for 802.11ac, but with few compatible devices, it won’t revolutionise your home network
Review Date: 1 Oct 2012
Reviewed By: Jonathan Bray
Price when reviewed: £150 (£180 inc VAT)
Features & Design
Value for Money
The transition from 802.11g to faster 802.11n Wi-Fi was among the slowest, most drawn-out upgrades in the history of technology. It was only officially ratified by the IEEE standards committee in 2009, but before that, we had years of unofficial “pre-n” and “draft-n” products released as manufacturers and consumers lost patience.
Thankfully, it looks as if its successor – 802.11ac – will go through the process far more quickly. Although still at the “draft 2” stage, it’s predicted the standard will be finalised by the end of 2012, with manufacturers already delivering new hardware. This Netgear R6300 cable router is the first supporting the new standard we’ve seen.
The 802.11ac standard is intended to boost wireless speeds and range. It only operates in the 5GHz band but is backwards-compatible with 802.11n devices, which means if you buy an R6300 now you’ll be able to connect any dual-band laptop, smartphone and tablet over 5GHz just as you would any regular dual-band 802.11n router. The Netgear R6300 also sports a 2.4GHz radio, allowing concurrent 802.11n and 802.11ac connections.
Over 802.11ac, the potential speed gains are significant. This Netgear R6300 router has a theoretical maximum throughput of up to 1,300Mbits/sec, almost three times the 450Mbits/sec claim you’ll see on the fastest 802.11n routers, and there’s also headroom in the standard for speeds far in excess of this.
These speeds are achieved in two key ways. First, the 802.11ac has support for wider channels. While 802.11n supported a maximum channel bandwidth of 40MHz, 802.11ac goes right up to 160MHz. Second, the standard supports the use of more MIMO (multiple input and multiple output) spatial streams, up to eight from four in 802.11n. With a single spatial giving a maximum possible throughput of 433Mbits/sec on an 80MHz channel, there’s potential for throughput of up to 6.93Gbits/sec.
That’s the theory, but as we’ve found over the years, such figures are rarely achievable in real-world use. So we set about putting the R6300, which supports 80MHz channels and three simultaneous streams, through our usual battery of wireless tests.
Does it actually work? PC Pro has reviewed Netgear routers in the past and once on sale they've presented owners with many, MANY, issues.
I owned the N600 and it would not hold a stable connection.
As with ALL Netgear devices wait at least a month, check the Netgear support forums and if you're feeling lucky, then buy the device.
By rhythm on 1 Oct 2012
Thanks for the review
Thanks for the detailed review of this new generation of upcoming routers. I really hope that your prediction of 802.11ac being ratified by the end of 2012 is correct. It would be refreshing if the IEEE were to ratify it so soon.
The official timeline at
Unfortunately shows a very different picture.
I look forward to such devices being available.
By Jimbo762 on 1 Oct 2012
By JohnHo1 on 2 Oct 2012
But REAL transfer speeds
I am deeply sceptical.
My router has official speeds of 108Mbps, but I rarely achieve a twentieth of that.
I suspect the numbers here will be as meaningless.
But maybe I'll get 10Mbps.
By Tony_Yeah on 4 Oct 2012
Doomed to fail
As if the available channels in the wifi spectrum (both 2.4 and 5GHz) were not congested enough, now we have not only MIMO triple-channel use, but four times the channel width . .. anyone else see a problem here?
Collision-based technologies such as wifi suffer badly from co-channel interference, which the numpties at ISPs seem to either fail to understand or to ignore completely - e.g. BT and its 3 wifi networks on the same channel (by default) in the same router!
This router seems capable of occupying virtually the whole available spectrum by itself, which will only make the problem orders of magnitude worse, not to mention the "elecrosmog" issue that was rather patronisingly covered in a recent issue by someone who clearly doesn't understand the physics of the matter.
By onanymouse on 4 Oct 2012
- Second NatWest outage in a week after DDoS attack
- Ex-Microsoft exec Paul Maritz "too old" to do Ballmer's job
- Microsoft patches TIFF flaw in next Patch Tuesday
- HP builds Leap Motion into keyboards
- Spotify expected to offer mobile music for free
- Briton sues Microsoft over NSA data spying
- Microsoft takes down $2.7m click-fraud botnet
- 3D printed guns worth ten years in jail
- Government unveils £10m for "innovative" broadband, but quiet about last fund's fate
- Why teachers shouldn't be nervous about shift to coding
- Tech City: Easy to score when you move the goalposts
- How to remove SkyDrive from the Windows 8.1 Explorer
- Switching from iPhone to Android? Switch off iMessage
- Why is Google pumping more money into Firefox?
- Sky Broadband Shield review
- Samsung Galaxy S4: how to double your battery life
- Motorola Moto G review: first look
- IBM Watson meets Willy Wonka
- Google’s support policies shove users towards Chrome
- Lenovo Yoga Tablet review: first look
- Closer to reality: photorealism in computer graphics
- Windows 8.1: Top 10 advanced features
- Securing the Internet of Things
- Internet of Things: five unlikely hacking risks
- Life behind the wall: censorship in China
- 42 best Android apps
- 3D museums that never close
- 29 best Windows 8.1 apps
- Bring an old PC up to speed
- My PC is infected: what now?
- The importance of load balancing
- Windows Phone App Studio: an easy way to create your first Windows Phone 8 app
- The end of Windows XP support: what it really means for businesses
- Don't rely on Chrome's password vault
- Using Buffer to manage your social media
- Microsoft needs its own Steve Jobs
- Forget credit cards: hackers want your Facebook account
- Can't get fast enough broadband? Here's what to do
- Leap Motion and the battle against UI stagnation
- How to build a really bad network
There are dozens of exciting prizes up for grabs on PC Pro Competitions. All our competitions are free to enter. Try your luck.ENTER NOW