Belkin Play Max review
in Wireless routers
Verdict
Good performance, a wide range of features and a very tempting price, just ignore the hype over those apps
Review Date: 9 Aug 2010
Reviewed By: Jonathan Bray
Price when reviewed: £93 (£109 inc VAT)
Features & Design
![]()
Value for Money
![]()
Performance
![]()
When we reviewed Belkin's first concurrent dual-band router, the Double N+, we were impressed with its raw speed. The new Play Max range offers a similar feature set, adding an ADSL version to the mix (it's also available as a cable router around £20 less) with concurrent 300Mbits/sec 2.4GHz and 5GHz wireless connections, but instead of focusing on performance Belkin prefers to highlight the router's features.
To be fair to it, it's bursting at the seams, and connectivity is the first area to get a boost. The Play Max sports not one but two USB ports at the rear, supporting printer and external hard disk connections. You get four Gigabit ports, there's UPnP-compatible media-sharing, oddly dubbed Music Mover, and a BitTorrent client for offline downloads to a connected hard disk. As with previous Belkin routers we've reviewed, there's also a wide range of useful features buried in the device's web admin pages. There's a guest SSID mode for each band, plus the facility to place the router into Access Point mode with a single click, disabling NAT and firewall features, so you can extend an existing wired network.
The Play Max (part code: F7D4401UK), as Belkin is keen to point out in its marketing materials, also comes with "apps". Don't get too excited, however: as it transpires, these are little more than a marketing sham, and are about as close to what you'd think of as apps as Aberdeen is to Sydney. The "apps" in question merely refer to a collection of proprietary software tools installed when you set up the router, and you don't seem to be able to download more. Even more confusingly, some of the "apps" are called one thing on the box and Belkin's website, and appear as another after install. It's an embarrassing mess.
Wade through the marketing mire, however, and there are some useful tools. The software installs a status light in your System Tray, which does the same job as the light on the front of the router itself, indicating the health of the router's internet connection right on your desktop. Right-click that icon and up pops a menu, allowing you to control offline torrent downloads, adjust QoS settings, and fiddle with password settings without having to delve into the Play Max's web interface.
You can also run backups and check for and install firmware updates from here too - although be aware that Belkin's record of updating the firmware on its routers is patchy. When we checked for updates for the Double N+, launched five months ago, we found none.
Performance is consistent but not stellar. On the 5GHz band we measured download speeds from the router to our test laptop (equipped with an Intel WiFi Link 5300 adapter) of 120Mbits/sec at close range and upload speeds of 82Mbits/sec. On the 2.4GHz band, close-range speeds hit 113Mbits/sec and 63Mbits/sec respectively. It isn't as fast as its cousin, the Double N+.
Usually, performance falls away over 5GHz at distance, but our long-range test (30m, two walls in the way) revealed performance better than more than 2.4GHz at the same distance. We recorded an average download speed of 54Mbits/sec and upload speed of 28Mbits/sec over 5GHz, then 40Mbits/sec and 25Mibts/sec over 2.4GHz.
Storage performance, however, was slow. We plugged the recently reviewed Iocell 351UNE into the Play Max's USB socket, and connected our test laptop to the router via Gigabit and recorded paltry read speeds of just 27Mbits/sec (3.5MB/sec) and write speeds of 11Mbits/sec (1.4MB/sec). A replacement for a proper NAS drive this isn't, but it will be fine for music streaming and light backup jobs.
Ignore the flim-flam, then, and you'll find the Belkin Play Max is a good, solid router. Although it isn't the fastest we've ever seen, it boasts consistent speeds over both 2.4GHz and 5GHz bands, and performance at distance is perfectly acceptable. With a jam-packed specification list and a price that compares well with our favourite dual-band cable router, (the Linksys WRT610N) it's a very tempting buy.
Author: Jonathan Bray
From around the web
Sorry to be a pedant, but shouldn't that WRT610N link be to a Linksys WRT610N - not Netgear WRT610N (and it links to a completely different Netgear router).
By pbryanw on 9 Aug 2010 ![]()
Alternatives?
I've been considering the WRT610N since I read PC Pro's original review but it appears that, in the States at least, it was replaced some time ago by the Linksys E3000. Does anyone know (PC Pro guys?) when the E series will be available in Europe? Tx. :)
By capsaicin on 12 Aug 2010 ![]()
You need the firmware
Was dissapointed initially as web browsing performance was sluggish (I noticed the browser would sit on status of "looking up...." suggesting DNS issues). I think the issue was perhaps highlighted by a change at same time to my shiny new FTTP 100mb/s connection... was about to take it back today then noticed a firmware update has just been made available to resolve...you guessed it, DNS performance issues! Get the firmware update and it is fine. Surprised PC pro didn't pick up on this.
By silverous on 3 Oct 2010 ![]()
You need
DD-WRT.
I have it running on my F7D4302.
Only thing it doesn't support is the 5GHz band :-(
By 959ARN on 24 Feb 2011 ![]()
Utter Rubbish
Despite numerous firmware updates, software updates, reboots, all I suffer is dropped connections, complete loss of connections for long periods & worst of all Belkins Customer support is in India, so getting an answer that you can comprehend is nigh on impossible.
Leave this thing where it belongs on the shelf & stick to netgear or another brand.
By SKINHEAD1967 on 12 Apr 2011 ![]()
Very Poor (everything)
Just (June 2011) purchased one of these - whaddamistakatomakea - drops internet connections each hour, wireless connections barely reach 10 minutes before dropping and the support is **abyssmal** - they don't even know the features and specifications of their products and spend a long time in responding with useless information ( including "You need to turn router off and on again"). This reminded me why I'd never buy a belkin product again...
By Deepinsight on 15 Jun 2011 ![]()
advertisement
- LinkedIn revenue doubles as membership soars
- Kodak kills off cameras
- UK broadband project spending £1m on legal fees
- Microsoft: Windows on ARM won't be sold separately
- Intel pays five hours of profits to settle antitrust case
- Windows 8 on ARM to run desktop apps... but only Office
- Ofcom dithers over plans to tackle broadband slamming
- Data boost bolsters Vodafone revenue
- Google working on cloud storage system
- Lenovo's profit leaps 54% on market gains
- Chrome's shine getting lost in translation
- BytePac: the cardboard hard disk enclosure
- How tech loosens our grip on reality
- Hokum watch: Safer Internet Day
- Why I'm deleting Adobe from my PC
- Prepare to be patronised: it's Safer Internet Day
- Dear Sony, Samsung and every other tech company in the world: stop trying to be Apple
- Will Apple's Final Cut Pro X update placate the pros?
- Smartr Contacts for iPhone review
- Switching to Office 365's Outlook Web App
- The ultimate guide to passwords
- How Apple lulls Mac owners into a false sense of security
- Privacy - outdated luxury or public necessity?
- Building the bionic man
- The making of open-source software
- Top 10 stupid security stories of 2011
- 10 techs to watch in 2012
- PC Pro's favourite tech products of 2011
- 10 most read articles on PC Pro in 2011
- 50 ways to make your PC better
- Why virtualisation hasn't slowed the growth of data
- How to make Google AdWords work for your business
- The curse of sloppily written software
- Paying for your crimes with Bitcoin
- Behind the scenes: tech support for Formula 1
- The security risk of fat fingers
- Why Windows Phone 7 isn't quite ready for business
- When will Microsoft stop fiddling with Windows 8?
- Flash down the pan?
- Metro Style apps vs desktop applications
advertisement







