Apple Boot Camp Beta review
Verdict
We never thought We'd see it happen, but now you can run Windows XP natively on a Mac
Review Date: 18 May 2006
Price when reviewed:
The arrival of Boot Camp has to be one of the strangest computing events in a long while. Simply put, it allows you to install and run Windows XP on a Mac. It's no particular technical feat: the move to Intel-based Macs has meant that, in terms of hardware, they're now almost identical to PCs. Macs, however, have specific hardware locks that have prevented users from simply booting up an XP installation CD and putting Windows on it. But no longer: Boot Camp allows you to install a copy of XP alongside OS X and choose between each at boot time.
This would be news enough if it were an unofficial third-party utility. But no; Boot Camp has been produced in-house by Apple itself.
Installation requirements are pretty basic: you need an Intel-based Mac, since XP is compiled for x86 processors and simply won't run on anything else. Then you need to hop over to www.apple.com and download the Boot Camp installer from within Mac OS X. You also need to make sure you've downloaded and installed the latest firmware (aka BIOS) for your particular Mac model. Then, on a blank CD, the installer burns appropriate Windows XP drivers from within OS X, allowing you to get your hardware up and running once you're into the XP environment. The final requirement is a full retail copy of Windows XP with Service Pack 2. Non-SP 2 or upgrade versions are no good.
The Boot Camp Assistant installer is an 80MB download. It's a simple wizard-style affair that runs within OS X, taking you through burning the driver CD and then creating a partition for the XP installation. You can choose the size of the XP partition, the only restriction being that you need 5GB for OS X. Once that's done, you just need to pop your XP installation disc in the drive and reboot: the system restarts, booting from CD and into the standard XP blue installation screen. From here on in, you are, to all intents and purpose, working with a standard PC.
Transferring files between the two operating systems is easy one way but difficult the other. If your XP partition is smaller than 32GB, you can format it to FAT32 - you get the option of FAT32 or NTFS within the Boot Camp installer - and then mount, read and write to the XP partition from within OS X with no problems. But Mac OS X itself lives on an HFS+ filing system that XP can't read, meaning the easiest way of transferring a file from OS X to XP is to save it out to a USB flash drive or the network, reboot and pull it back in again.
Once booted into XP, the hardware performs just as we'd expect. Our standard real-world benchmark application suite installed and ran with no problems on a Mac mini, and the score was more or less what we'd have guessed. The mini's hardware consists of an Intel Core Duo T2300 - this is the slowest Duo variant running at 1.66GHz - along with 512MB of RAM and standard Intel GMA 950 integrated graphics, plus a 2.5in notebook hard disk. Given that, the overall score of 0.85 was bang on the money: we've seen Core Duo notebooks that perform faster, but they're usually fitted with faster T2400 and T2500 CPUs, and often 7,200rpm hard disks.
You can't remove OS X completely, and Apple's strategy is potentially a dangerous one: it's clearly hoping that the ability to run XP will tempt PC users to get themselves one of those shiny - and fairly cheap - Mac minis and put up with the loss of 5GB or so of disk space to OS X. It's then hoping that said PC users will boot up OS X and decide they don't really want XP after all.
From around the web
advertisement
- Google legal chief: privacy laws too hard on SMBs
- No free Visual Studio for Windows 8 desktop developers
- Facebook spends $1bn on Instagram... then launches its own Camera app
- Who sends Google the most takedown notices? Microsoft
- Microsoft wins text patent battle against Motorola
- Watchdog fines firm £50,000 over Android malware
- Intel to test smartcity future on London
- June decision on Microsoft's billion-dollar EU fine
- Yahoo browser launch marred by security flaw
- Autonomy management walk out over HP bureaucracy
- Laptop bag reviews: nine tested
- Sony VAIO T Series Ultrabook review: first look
- Revealed: the military standards and robots HP uses to test its laptops
- Windows 8: multi-monitors and double standards?
- Why is TalkTalk's year-old porn filter suddenly big news?
- Why are laptop screens so far behind mobiles?
- HP EliteBook Folio review: first look
- The shoebox-sized all-in-one printer
- Forget the Ultrabook: here comes the HP Sleekbook
- HP Spectre XT review: first look
- Can you buy technology with a clean conscience?
- The death of email
- How to use Windows 8 Metro
- 30 best features of Windows 8
- How to become a cyberspy
- Create your own smart home
- Install a custom ROM on your smartphone
- Can the Raspberry Pi save computing?
- Google: the pirates' best friend?
- Backups: ten tips to keep your data safe
- Why you have to be left in the dark on OS patches
- Is Microsoft mismanaging Windows on ARM?
- Dealing with spam surrogates
- Why 3G broadband can be better and cheaper than ADSL
- Is Twitter bad for business?
- Publishing your email address isn't a security disaster
- Why you'll need a fax machine to develop iOS apps
- Learning to adapt to the mobile web
- Why you shouldn't use WPS on your Wi-Fi network
- Disabled users suffer when software breaks the rules
advertisement





