Crystal Reports 9 review
Verdict
A real improvement over previous versions, with plenty of productivity enhancements to help experts get the most out of their data. However, the steep learning curve and high price still need to be addressed.
Review Date: 25 Nov 2002
Reviewed By: Maggie Williams
Price when reviewed: Professional, £351; Developer, £422; Advanced, £1,416 (all prices exc VAT)
However, structuring and formatting a report in the first place is still awkward. For example, there's no option to automatically adjust a report's layout when new elements such as formula fields or text objects are added. As a result, getting layouts correct is still time-consuming and fiddly, making the new template reuse features all the more welcome.
A Template Expert manages completed templates. It includes a browse function for finding and applying Crystal Reports templates stored anywhere on a local drive or network. There's also a set of ten default templates included with the product, although few of these are genuinely usable. Existing reports can also be saved as templates, including files from earlier versions of Crystal Reports.
Crystal Reports 9 is one of the few applications to have embraced the Smart Tags functionality included in Microsoft's Office XP. Smart Tags enable you to link to an external application from within Word, Excel or Outlook, then pass data between that application and the Office XP document. In the case of Crystal Reports 9, this allows you to display elements of a database report within a word processor or spreadsheet document, then link directly to the original report. For reports where data is being extracted from multiple sources, this provides a quick and easy way of getting complex information into a shareable and editable format. By clicking on the Smart Tag, Word or Excel users can access the appropriate place in the original report using a separate browser window.
Features for web-based reporting include a Report Application Server, which requires Microsoft IIS (Internet Information Services) to be installed. The Report Application Server provides a selection of features for creating reports in HTML, Word and Excel, which can then be accessed without the need for a locally installed version of the product through a standard browser.
After all the efforts to improve usability, Crystal Reports 9 is still best suited to developers with a strong understanding of SQL and database construction. Still, the interface's familiarity, in some parts, to the hierarchical folders used in Windows Explorer certainly simplifies the process of managing items within a repository. Plus, each report has a Design and a Preview mode, making it easy to monitor how the final document will appear during development.
Most of the features discussed are available across the whole product range. The Standard Edition includes all of the command and function-building features, as well as template controls, but it omits the important repository and web-based reporting controls. Professional adds web reporting and repository building. However, if you're interested in viewing or building reports using Java, .NET or COM, you'll need either the Developer or the Advanced Edition.
Most of Crystal Reports' competitors tend to be integrated into a wider set of business intelligence tools such as Cognos or MicroStrategy. As a result, it doesn't have a lot of opposition as a standalone tool for report building. However, if you're only working with a single data type, you'll probably find that the Standard Edition doesn't offer any compelling features over the reporting tools already accompanying your desktop database.
Although the new repository tools mean that less experienced users don't have to understand SQL or functions to create reports, this is still a complex product from a developer's perspective. However, improved features for managing both completed reports and reusable objects benefit productivity and make Crystal Reports more accessible. Also, new formatting and distribution features make the output from Crystal Reports 9 much more easily integrated with other applications. Output is now more flexible too, with the addition of Report Parts and web-based tools. These add up to some significant improvements for which you'll pay dearly, but it's still not for the faint-hearted.
Author: Maggie Williams
From around the web
advertisement
- Google legal chief: privacy laws too hard on SMBs
- No free Visual Studio for Windows 8 desktop developers
- Facebook spends $1bn on Instagram... then launches its own Camera app
- Who sends Google the most takedown notices? Microsoft
- Microsoft wins text patent battle against Motorola
- Watchdog fines firm £50,000 over Android malware
- Intel to test smartcity future on London
- June decision on Microsoft's billion-dollar EU fine
- Yahoo browser launch marred by security flaw
- Autonomy management walk out over HP bureaucracy
- Laptop bag reviews: nine tested
- Sony VAIO T Series Ultrabook review: first look
- Revealed: the military standards and robots HP uses to test its laptops
- Windows 8: multi-monitors and double standards?
- Why is TalkTalk's year-old porn filter suddenly big news?
- Why are laptop screens so far behind mobiles?
- HP EliteBook Folio review: first look
- The shoebox-sized all-in-one printer
- Forget the Ultrabook: here comes the HP Sleekbook
- HP Spectre XT review: first look
- Can you buy technology with a clean conscience?
- The death of email
- How to use Windows 8 Metro
- 30 best features of Windows 8
- How to become a cyberspy
- Create your own smart home
- Install a custom ROM on your smartphone
- Can the Raspberry Pi save computing?
- Google: the pirates' best friend?
- Backups: ten tips to keep your data safe
- Why you have to be left in the dark on OS patches
- Is Microsoft mismanaging Windows on ARM?
- Dealing with spam surrogates
- Why 3G broadband can be better and cheaper than ADSL
- Is Twitter bad for business?
- Publishing your email address isn't a security disaster
- Why you'll need a fax machine to develop iOS apps
- Learning to adapt to the mobile web
- Why you shouldn't use WPS on your Wi-Fi network
- Disabled users suffer when software breaks the rules
advertisement






