Amazon Kindle Fire HD 8.9in review
Amazon upgrades its Android-based tablet with a bigger, better screen
Review Date: 4 Apr 2013
Reviewed By: Darien Graham-Smith
Price when reviewed: £191 (16GB, £191 (£229 inc VAT); 32GB, £216 (£259 inc VAT). Without ads: 16GB, £199 (£239 inc VAT); 32GB, £224 (£269 inc VAT) inc VAT)
Features & Design
Value for Money
The Amazon Kindle Fire HD tablet made its UK debut in 7in form last September. Now, the 8.9in variant is here. With prices starting at £229 for the 16GB model, the new format is distinctly pricier than its 7in sibling, which comes in at £159.
Where the 7in model’s broad bezel looked cheap and chunky, however, this one is more comfortably proportioned, with thumb-sized edges sitting neatly around its 8.9in panel. And a fine panel it is: its 1,920 x 1,200 resolution represents a superfine pixel density of 254ppi – a smidgen behind the 264ppi of Apple’s “Retina” iPads, but a step up from the Nexus 7 and Amazon’s own Kindle Fire HD 7in, which both offer 216ppi. With a maximum brightness of 480cd/m2, and an excellent 980:1 contrast ratio, it’s beautifully bold and crisp, and a delight to read on. It also lends itself admirably to magazines and comics, an area where the traditional Kindle struggles.
The Kindle Fire is also a gateway to Amazon’s Lovefilm streaming service. Predictably, watching video is a pleasant experience, with rich – if not exactly vibrant – colour and excellent viewing angles. Dual-band, dual-antenna wireless helps ensure a smooth streaming experience (an LTE model is also offered in the US, although not yet here).
The speakers are nice and punchy, too, although if you turn up the volume to maximum, distortion becomes a problem. The glossy screen is rather susceptible to reflections, but a micro-HDMI port at the base makes it easy to hook up a TV if you prefer to watch on the big screen.
Naturally, the Kindle Fire HD 8.9in isn’t as light as an E Ink Kindle, but at 567g it can be thrown in a bag easily enough. Similarly, while battery life is measured in hours rather than days, it’s very creditable by the standards of touchscreen tablets. With wireless disabled, and the screen set to half brightness, our video rundown test looped for 12hrs 26mins on a single charge – enough to keep you entertained on even the longest flight. When streaming wirelessly from Lovefilm, battery life naturally falls, but Amazon still promises more than ten hours of viewing time.
Through all of this, Amazon’s custom front-end puts your content front and centre, and cleverly encourages you to build up your library by placing recommendations directly on the homescreen, ready to be purchased with a few clicks. If you’re primarily looking for a tablet for consuming books and videos, it’s all accessible and effective.
Amazon App Store is a Joke
My daughter has the Kindle Fire HD 7" and while it is a fine tablet the app situation really annoys me. If you want BBC iPlayer, ITV player or even YouTube you need to locate the apk files and sideload them. This is really not as simple as it sounds and I came across some dodgy sites claiming to have the .apk files. Just be careful where you try to get them from!
By dwmoook on 4 Apr 2013
"However, since no-one else is offering a full-size Android tablet at this price, the Kindle Fire HD 8.9in’s foibles could be worth putting up with."
Bet you wish you had not typed that out.
Archos Platinum 97HD £229 on Amazon (!) quad core cpu, 8 core graphics, 9.7" 2048 x 1536 pixel IPS panel, fully google play certified. OK its only 8gb but the SD card slot accepts 64gb media.
or the Titanium version for sub £200 with dual core cpu and quad core graphics.
I am sure there are many others.
By davidk1962 on 4 Apr 2013
The Kindle Fire is also a gateway to Amazon’s Lovefilm streaming service.
This is the only reason to by a kindle fire. Otherwise, it's nothing special and more expensive that the nexus.
By JamesD29 on 4 Apr 2013
Buy a dictionary
To Darien Graham-Smith
Buy yourself a dictionary and stop using words you don't understand:- (Equivocal:calculus:consuming)!!
By oldpedant on 4 Apr 2013
You'd have to really dislike movies to want to watch them on a 9-inch screen.
By nelviticus on 4 Apr 2013
- Nokia Lumia 2520 tablet sales halted over faulty charger
- Microsoft slashes custom XP support price
- Amazon Phone: does anyone want a 3D handset?
- Virgin email fiasco hits thousands of users
- Chrome Remote Desktop now available on Android
- Google posts "average quarter" with slow growth
- What's on this week's PC Pro podcast?
- BBC iPlayer lets Android devices download shows
- Google's Project Ara modular phone arrives in January
- Hackers harvest LaCie card data for a full year
- Windows 8.1 Update: an abject surrender
- The insane economics of Sky Now TV
- No such thing as a free app... so pay up if you want quality
- Time to outlaw crapware-laden installers
- Windows Phone 8.1 video: hands-on
- Office for iPad: key information
- Why every PC buyer owes Richard Durkin a debt of gratitude
- HTC One M8 vs Samsung Galaxy S5: 2014's big-hitters compared
- Windows XP end of life: key information
- Cut out the broadband jargon? What jargon?
- The great iPhone ripoff and how it works
- Heartbleed: what you need to know and do
- Data recovery: inside the clean room
- Best tablet PCs to buy in 2014
- How much RAM do you really need?
- News of the weird: the strangest ever tech stories
- Five hyped technologies: disruptive or not?
- Piracy's dying: why we're all going straight
- Office: should you buy it, rent it - or dump it?
- Make the most of your mobile data
- Make your mobile battery last longer
- Small steps into handling Big Data
- Nexus 5: does it really run stock Android?
- How to get broadband to a garden office
- How to write your company's IT security policy
- Raspberry Pi and Wolfram: a must-have for every child
- Could you get by with Office Web Apps?
- The best Android antivirus apps for 2014
- Headings vs headers: how to use both in Word
- Windows Server 2012 R2: how the Datacenter edition could change SMBs