LG Optimus Pad review
A solid tablet, but its 3D video features and slightly smaller size aren’t worth paying such a huge premium for
Review Date: 12 Aug 2011
Reviewed By: Jonathan Bray
Price when reviewed: £625 (£750 inc VAT)
Features & Design
Value for Money
The tablet market is beginning to get rather crowded right now. The release of the iPad 2 was quickly followed by Android 3 offerings from Motorola, Acer and Asus, then BlackBerry and HP pitched in with proprietary offerings, and recently Samsung has lit the blue touchpaper with its excellent, yet temporarily banned, Galaxy Tab 10.1.
LG looks to be coming to the party pretty late with the Optimus Pad, and so has a couple of special tricks up its sleeve with which to woo potential customers. Its first unusual feature is its size – with its 8.9in 1,280 x 768 screen, the Optimus Pad sits entirely on its own, with every other manufacturer on the market producing either 7in or 10in models at the moment.
For our money, it’s a reasonable compromise between the two, but not without its problems. On the plus side, it’s a little more portable than most 10in tablets, and thus better suited to reading on the go. It’s more comfortable for browsing the web than a 7in tablet, too. The disappointments start with the thickness and weight. At 18mm its girth is more than double that of the iPad 2 and Galaxy Tab 10.1, and at 620g it’s heavier than both.
We’re not over-keen on the the extra-wide aspect ratio display, either, which makes it even less conducive to using in portrait mode than the 1,280 x 800 screen on models such as the Galaxy Tab and Asus Eee Pad Transformer. Finally, the tighter pixel pitch also means buttons and onscreen options are generally fiddlier to use too.
The other prong to LG’s unusual approach is 3D, and alas it’s just as hit and miss. As with its Optimus 3D smartphone, the Pad boasts a pair of beady eyes on its rear – two 5-megapixel digital cameras – and these allow the tablet to shoot video in stereoscopic 3D at 720p.
Unlike its smaller cousin, however, the pad has a standard TFT screen, so to view this footage you either have to hook the tablet up to a proper 3D-enabled TV via the tablet’s HDMI output, or don the red and blue anaglyph glasses provided in the box, and prepare for 1980s-style 3D.
If that wasn’t bad enough, the software integration is very light indeed. To shoot, browse and play 3D footage on the tablet itself you have to use separate applications to the standard Honeycomb ones, and within these there are no options to directly upload the footage to YouTube and share it with friends. You have to use the standard Honeycomb app for that.
Same old, same old?
Aside from the disappointing headline features, though, the LG Optimus Pad is a perfectly solid tablet. It appears to be well made – the soft plastic rear doesn’t creak or bend, and the finish makes it grippy and comfortable to hold. The display itself is bright and clear – we measured it at an iPad 2-beating maximum brightness of 398cd/m2 and a sound 622:1 contrast ratio.
I laughed out loud when I saw the price.
By PaulOckenden on 15 Aug 2011
Yikes, that's a bit steep.
If I really wanted 3-D I'd spend the extra and get a 3-D TV.
By Lacrobat on 15 Aug 2011
The 720P 8" glasses-free 3D tablet-style media player, the Gadmei P83 retails at a majestic 1/10th of the price of this heap.
By robblack21 on 15 Aug 2011
A move in the wrong direction
If nothing else, the glasses look kind of hawt. MEOW!
I got into this Tegra 2 thing very early on. Game apps are a nightmare to hunt down, with too many hardware versions for Android. And the only mobile game company worth a damn (Gameloft) provides half-arse support for Honeycomb tablets. Of course you can play the nauseating, seasonal, vomit-a-thon Angry Bird, well, that is one game for you!
So, app shortage aside, they want 750 for this gimmick thing that did not help Nintendo move volumes of their new handheld? No thanks.
Besides, in the last movie I went to (Final Destination), I opted for the non-3D version because the 3D glasses always slip down my normal glasses. The 3D people really need to rethink this 3D concept. Either give us a Star Wars holographic solution or bitch, just GTFO.
By hottech on 4 Sep 2011
- Europol warns: public Wi-Fi isn't safe
- Privacy groups challenge Facebook's WhatsApp buy
- IDC: iPad intertia opens door for Windows tablets
- Chip breakthrough to eliminate checkout queues
- Rivals put on notice as Spotify snaps up The Echo Nest
- Windows 8.1 Update 1 leaks via Microsoft's website
- Bitcoin "founder" says: you've got the wrong man
- Has bitcoin creator been found?
- HTC Desire 310: more competition for the Moto G
- Mozilla questions why Dell charges £16 to install Firefox
- Move over Delia: IBM Watson is cooking tonight
- Eric Schmidt on the double-edged smartphone: friend and foe
- Getty joins the race to the bottom
- Hour of Code: five steps to learn how to code
- Sony Xperia Z2 Tablet review: first look
- Sony Xperia Z2 review: first look
- Samsung Galaxy Gear 2 review: first look
- Nokia XL review: first look
- Samsung Galaxy S5 review: first look
- Nokia X review: first look
- Make the most of your mobile data
- Old-school internet scams: five that just won't die
- Bitcoin believers not worried by Mt. Gox disarray
- How to hack your car
- Small server vs cloud: which is best for SMBs?
- Block party: why do millions play Minecraft?
- What to do if you’re still on Windows XP
- Microsoft Word: top 20 secret features
- Measuring me: is your body the future of security?
- The best mobile apps for business
- Windows Server 2012 R2: how the Datacenter edition could change SMBs
- Invoices and VAT: how to set up your documents correctly
- Nexus 5 vs Samsung Galaxy S4 Active: the best phone for avoiding screen burn
- How much is a social user worth?
- The key to choosing a secure password
- Thunderbolt Bridge: a fast Mac migration tool
- Should you advertise on Twitter?
- How to track a lost smartphone
- Self-publishing success: the best way to sell your book
- 1.6TB SSD: why would you need one?