Quantum DXi4510 review
in Storage appliances
Verdict
Quantum delivers enterprise-level deduplication that's affordable for SMBs. The DXi4510 is easy to deploy
Review Date: 6 Sep 2010
Reviewed By: Dave Mitchell
Price when reviewed: £8,334 (£9,792 inc VAT)
Features & Design
![]()
Value for Money
![]()
Performance
![]()
![]()
To carry out the test backups, we used CA's ARCserve r12.5 running on a Windows Server 2008 R2 system. To get it to work with the appliance, we created an ARCserve disk backup location that pointed at the appliance's share.
After the first full backup was completed, we modified 2% of the data in 40% of the files prior to each subsequent backup. Quantum's reporting facilities were used to determine the amount of data sent to the appliance, and how much was actually being stored on it.
After a two-week simulation we saw Quantum report a deduplication ratio of 4.25:1, showing good savings on storage. The amount of data sent to the appliance was recorded at 26.8GB, but the actual data stored on the share was 6.3GB.
We then continued the test for a further two weeks, and at the end of a simulated one-month backup period the appliance reported a data deduplication ratio of 7.22:1. Naturally, the ratios that can be achieved will depend on the type of data being secured, its compressibility, the rate of change and the retention period.
To test general throughput performance, we created a new share on the appliance and asked ARCserve to run a full backup of a folder on our test server containing 13,000 files totalling 28GB. With the backup running over Gigabit, the job was completed at a rate of 43MB/sec, which equates to a very tidy 152GB/hour.
Before using the esXpress software, we recommend sitting down and reading all seven manuals since configuration is a lengthy and unintuitive process. The product consists of an OVF file that's used to create a VM running the optional Quorum web GUI. If you don't use this, you must manually install the supplied RPM files on each host to be backed up.
We opted to use the GUI and created a VM for it on our ESX Server 4 system. The browser console provides a wizard where you declare your VMware host, create backup targets that point to the appliance, and decide on the backup frequency and window - and whether they should be full, delta or file level.
You can opt for scheduled daily and monthly backups, and use filters to determine which VMs are to be secured. The VMware service console can also be used to load the esXpress main menu from where you can run on-demand backups of all or selected VMs and check the esXpress logs.
The esXpress software is complex and needs to be more user friendly, but for general network backup operations the DXi4510 is easy to configure and use. Quantum's deduplication technology can significantly reduce storage requirements, and its choice of hardware platform is beyond reproach.
Author: Dave Mitchell
From around the web
More medium/large than SMB
Being in a SMB/OMB with 10+ users + 3 offsite ,exchange scanners etc.
I can just seeing the conversation with my boss about a £8.5k bit of kit plus installation etc etc.
Ain't going to happen
By petermalins on 6 Sep 2010 ![]()
Size of an SMB
I doubt if such a small number of users would generate enough backup data to make deduplication worthwhile.
Don't forget, the term SMB can cover businesses of up to 500 users.
By DaveMitchell on 6 Sep 2010 ![]()
We have many medium size business' looking for deduplication devices which will act as a NAS (for Vmware) and VTL for agent based backups. The most important feature is replication so that they can copy data over quite thin links such as MPLS. So far we have deployed HP D2D devices which have been problematic due to their method of replication but will soon be using Data Domain instead. DD are still quite expensive (as you would expect as part of EMC) but far more effective. I'm not sure I will get much interest from a Quantum especially as it is based on a Dell Server (we are a HP house).
By Dr_Aspirin on 10 Sep 2010 ![]()
HP D2D replication
@Dr_Aspirin - what problems are you having with HP's method of replication?
By DaveMitchell on 11 Sep 2010 ![]()
advertisement
- Autonomy's Lynch joins 27,000 on way out of HP
- ICO: no fines for breaking cookie rules
- HP set to slash up to 30,000 jobs
- Government sites to miss cookie deadline
- Microsoft tweaks multi-monitor support in Windows 8
- Apple patches Leopard, despite ending support last year
- Defra opens rural broadband funding applications
- BT's broadband sales surpass calls revenue
- Apple patches multiple security issues
- FBI warns travellers to beware attacks via hotel Wi-Fi
- Laptop bag reviews: nine tested
- Sony VAIO T Series Ultrabook review: first look
- Revealed: the military standards and robots HP uses to test its laptops
- Windows 8: multi-monitors and double standards?
- Why is TalkTalk's year-old porn filter suddenly big news?
- Why are laptop screens so far behind mobiles?
- HP EliteBook Folio review: first look
- The shoebox-sized all-in-one printer
- Forget the Ultrabook: here comes the HP Sleekbook
- HP Spectre XT review: first look
- The death of email
- Backups: ten tips to keep your data safe
- Tablets for work: the best apps, kit and advice
- Why everyone hates the IT department
- Is online shopping security fundamentally broken?
- New cookie laws: why website owners should be worried
- Are work web blockers a waste of time?
- 11 golden rules for virtualisation
- When is it right to go public with security flaws?
- Is your business ready for VoIP?
- Why you have to be left in the dark on OS patches
- Is Microsoft mismanaging Windows on ARM?
- Dealing with spam surrogates
- Why 3G broadband can be better and cheaper than ADSL
- Is Twitter bad for business?
- Publishing your email address isn't a security disaster
- Why you'll need a fax machine to develop iOS apps
- Learning to adapt to the mobile web
- Why you shouldn't use WPS on your Wi-Fi network
- Disabled users suffer when software breaks the rules
advertisement






