Quantum DXi4510 review
in Storage appliances
Verdict
Quantum delivers enterprise-level deduplication that's affordable for SMBs. The DXi4510 is easy to deploy
Review Date: 6 Sep 2010
Reviewed By: Dave Mitchell
Price when reviewed: £8,334 (£9,792 inc VAT)
Features & Design
![]()
Value for Money
![]()
Performance
![]()
![]()
Quantum's latest DXi4510 aims to deliver an affordable data deduplication solution that brings this space-saving technology within the reach of SMBs. Furthermore, it avoids using virtual tape libraries (VTLs) and presents its storage as CIFS and NFS network shares, making it very easy to deploy and use.
Data reduction is carried out at the appliance and has a big advantage over source-based deduplication, as it will work with any backup software you choose. The main drawback is that all data selected on the source must be processed by the appliance, so network overheads will be higher.
Quantum choice of hardware gets our thumbs up: hiding behind the bezel is a top-quality PowerEdge R510 2U rack server. Storage is handled by eight hot-swap SATA drives managed by a Dell PERC H700 controller as a single RAID6 array.
There are no hidden costs, as the price includes all data deduplication and compression features plus remote replication to another appliance. Along with NAS shares, the appliance supports Symantec's OpenStorage (OST) API, allowing it to work with NetBackup's data mover function.
Quantum also targets virtualised environments: esXpress Backup for VMware ESX software with support for four virtual backup appliances is included. This allows you to schedule automated, daily backups of virtual machines or run them on demand.
Creating NAS shares from the well-designed web interface is easy: choose a name, go for CIFS or NFS protocols, and define access permissions where workgroup and AD modes are supported. At this stage, you also decide whether deduplication should be enabled on the share, but this is a one-way trip and can't be reversed later on.
The console provides plenty of status information so you can keep track of network, RAID, deduplication and ingest activity on the appliance. You can view the deduplication ratio being achieved, check on storage usage, and set up alerts that can be emailed to multiple recipients.
To test deduplication ratios, we ran our own set of lab tests designed specifically to look at performance for file server operations. We used a 4GB data set consisting of 1,000 files and introduced controlled changes within a percentage of the files during a simulated standard backup strategy consisting of daily incrementals and weekly full backups.
From around the web
More medium/large than SMB
Being in a SMB/OMB with 10+ users + 3 offsite ,exchange scanners etc.
I can just seeing the conversation with my boss about a £8.5k bit of kit plus installation etc etc.
Ain't going to happen
By petermalins on 6 Sep 2010 ![]()
Size of an SMB
I doubt if such a small number of users would generate enough backup data to make deduplication worthwhile.
Don't forget, the term SMB can cover businesses of up to 500 users.
By DaveMitchell on 6 Sep 2010 ![]()
We have many medium size business' looking for deduplication devices which will act as a NAS (for Vmware) and VTL for agent based backups. The most important feature is replication so that they can copy data over quite thin links such as MPLS. So far we have deployed HP D2D devices which have been problematic due to their method of replication but will soon be using Data Domain instead. DD are still quite expensive (as you would expect as part of EMC) but far more effective. I'm not sure I will get much interest from a Quantum especially as it is based on a Dell Server (we are a HP house).
By Dr_Aspirin on 10 Sep 2010 ![]()
HP D2D replication
@Dr_Aspirin - what problems are you having with HP's method of replication?
By DaveMitchell on 11 Sep 2010 ![]()
advertisement
- VeriSign slammed for security breach cover-up
- SAP willing to share HANA with Oracle
- Why using a tablet could harm your health
- New RIM boss: no need for drastic change
- RIM founders fall on their swords
- Slow economy helps boost Red Hat revenue by 23%
- Google+ pages get multiple admins
- One in five companies lack card industry compliance
- Oil industry warns hacking attacks could kill
- British workers fear email monitoring
- Chrome's shine getting lost in translation
- BytePac: the cardboard hard disk enclosure
- How tech loosens our grip on reality
- Hokum watch: Safer Internet Day
- Why I'm deleting Adobe from my PC
- Prepare to be patronised: it's Safer Internet Day
- Dear Sony, Samsung and every other tech company in the world: stop trying to be Apple
- Will Apple's Final Cut Pro X update placate the pros?
- Smartr Contacts for iPhone review
- Switching to Office 365's Outlook Web App
- Why everyone hates the IT department
- Is online shopping security fundamentally broken?
- New cookie laws: why website owners should be worried
- Are work web blockers a waste of time?
- 11 golden rules for virtualisation
- When is it right to go public with security flaws?
- Is your business ready for VoIP?
- Remote working for small businesses
- The Complete Guide to Office 2010
- The complete guide to Office 2010: Web Apps
- Why virtualisation hasn't slowed the growth of data
- How to make Google AdWords work for your business
- The curse of sloppily written software
- Paying for your crimes with Bitcoin
- Behind the scenes: tech support for Formula 1
- The security risk of fat fingers
- Why Windows Phone 7 isn't quite ready for business
- When will Microsoft stop fiddling with Windows 8?
- Flash down the pan?
- Metro Style apps vs desktop applications
advertisement






