Dot Hill 2522 review
in Storage appliances
Verdict
Dot Hill comes out with the first 2U SFF disk array, which packs a lot into its compact dimensions
Review Date: 7 Aug 2009
Reviewed By: Dave Mitchell
Price when reviewed: £11,500 (£13,225 inc VAT)
Features & Design
![]()
Value for Money
![]()
Performance
![]()
![]()
The 2522 supports Microsoft's MPIO (multi-path I/O), which uses multiple hardware components to create redundant paths from hosts to storage volumes, and Dot Hill provides its DSM (device specific module) as standard. Unlike iSCSI, there's nothing to do for configuration here. If you have one physical connection to the array then one drive appears, and when you attached the second cable an MPIO link is automatically created.
For testing we called up a Broadberry CyberServe dual 2.8GHz X5560 Xeon server equipped with 12GB of DDR3 memory, and a LSI SAS3801E HBA running Windows Server 2003 R2. On the 2522 we created a five drive RAID5 array plus a dual drive stripe. With an MPIO link in action, the Iometer utility reported very impressive raw read and write throughputs on the RAID5 array of 540MB/sec and 290MB/sec. There wasn't much to see between RAID5 and the striped array with the latter returning 541MB/sec and 281MB/sec read and write speeds.
We also tested MPIO on the RAID5 array by removing one of the SAS cables while Iometer was running. The Windows Device Manager noted that one of the MPIO drives had been removed, but Iometer continued unabated, reporting a raw read throughput of 280MB/sec. With the secondary link restored performance climbed back up to 540MB/sec with no interruptions.
Along with good overall performance, the 2522 delivers in the power stakes with our inline meter measuring a draw of 312W with all drives idle. With Iometer running across all 24 drives we saw this increase only slightly to 325W.
Compared with FC and IP SAN disk arrays, the 2522 is a little pricey but it's very easy to deploy and delivers superior performance. It offers plenty of redundancy and expansion potential, while the smaller SFF hard disks have a positive impact on power consumption and cooling requirements.
Author: Dave Mitchell
From around the web
advertisement
- Autonomy's Lynch joins 27,000 on way out of HP
- ICO: no fines for breaking cookie rules
- HP set to slash up to 30,000 jobs
- Government sites to miss cookie deadline
- Microsoft tweaks multi-monitor support in Windows 8
- Apple patches Leopard, despite ending support last year
- Defra opens rural broadband funding applications
- BT's broadband sales surpass calls revenue
- Apple patches multiple security issues
- FBI warns travellers to beware attacks via hotel Wi-Fi
- Laptop bag reviews: nine tested
- Sony VAIO T Series Ultrabook review: first look
- Revealed: the military standards and robots HP uses to test its laptops
- Windows 8: multi-monitors and double standards?
- Why is TalkTalk's year-old porn filter suddenly big news?
- Why are laptop screens so far behind mobiles?
- HP EliteBook Folio review: first look
- The shoebox-sized all-in-one printer
- Forget the Ultrabook: here comes the HP Sleekbook
- HP Spectre XT review: first look
- The death of email
- Backups: ten tips to keep your data safe
- Tablets for work: the best apps, kit and advice
- Why everyone hates the IT department
- Is online shopping security fundamentally broken?
- New cookie laws: why website owners should be worried
- Are work web blockers a waste of time?
- 11 golden rules for virtualisation
- When is it right to go public with security flaws?
- Is your business ready for VoIP?
- Why you have to be left in the dark on OS patches
- Is Microsoft mismanaging Windows on ARM?
- Dealing with spam surrogates
- Why 3G broadband can be better and cheaper than ADSL
- Is Twitter bad for business?
- Publishing your email address isn't a security disaster
- Why you'll need a fax machine to develop iOS apps
- Learning to adapt to the mobile web
- Why you shouldn't use WPS on your Wi-Fi network
- Disabled users suffer when software breaks the rules
advertisement





