ACDSee Pro 4 review
Verdict
A worthy challenger to the pricier Adobe Lightroom, but most of the differences fall in Adobe's favour
Review Date: 6 Jun 2011
Reviewed By: Ben Pitt
Price when reviewed: £116 (£139 inc VAT)
Features & Design
![]()
Value for Money
![]()
Ease of Use
![]()
There’s a wide range of photo-management software on the market, with an equally wide range of prices. Google Picasa is free, making it perfect for casual users. Adobe Photoshop Lightroom dominates for enthusiasts, but its £215 price is too high for most amateur photographers. In between sits ACDSee Pro 4: a highly capable, more affordable alternative.
Its various modules closely match those in Lightroom, with tabs for managing, viewing and processing photos, plus another for archiving and sharing them online. The latter integrates neatly with www.acdseeonline.com, which looks smart and includes some useful features of its own. It's also possible to upload to Flickr, although integration isn't as tight. Printing is well catered for, and slideshows are available for instant viewing or export in a variety of formats including PDF and PowerPoint.
Lightroom is no slouch when it comes to sorting through vast catalogues of photos, but ACDSee Pro 4 is even faster. It took a couple of hours to add our library of 33,000 images to its catalogue, but from then on it took less than a second to show all the photos for a given day or month using the simple Calendar browser. Filtering the entire catalogue by other criteria, such as camera model or focal length, was performed in a couple of seconds. The controls for combining multiple search criteria are much more immediate than Lightroom's, too.
One gripe is that some filter parameters are limited to predefined values rather than ranges. For example, you can view the ISO 100 or ISO 200 shots, but not any value in between. We were able to filter by file type, but Sony and Panasonic RAW file formats didn't appear on the list. Overall, though, the management facilities are easily a match for Lightroom's.
New to version 4 is the ability to view photos on a map, using the coordinates embedded into files by GPS-enabled cameras. Photos can also be tagged manually by dropping them onto the map, and these coordinates were correctly interpreted in Google Earth. The default screen layout for this Map View could be better, but the ability to save and recall custom Workspaces provided an effective remedy.
The Process tab is home to a comprehensive suite of tools: cropping and rotating, colour correction, sharpening and noise reduction, lens-distortion correction, blemish removal, watermarks and various special effects are offered. Localised edits are well catered for, with marquee and magic wand selection tools, plus the ability to feather selections for soft edges. However, while the main RAW-processing tools are applied non-destructively, localised edits are destructive, so it's not possible to tweak RAW-processing options after making localised edits. JPEG processing is always applied destructively, but old versions are stashed away in hidden subfolders, so the workflow for RAW and JPEG images is effectively the same.
NOT as Advertized
DO NOT BE FOOLED this software is a joke nad customer service is no existent, recently I was working huge job and again acdsee 3 had "issues" when I moved files to another folder in acdsee the corrupted and dissapeared, so in desperation I updated to "4" well it's really no better, crashes anfreeses if you make it do any heavy lifting. I have an i7 940 processor, 2 GB dedicated HD video card, 1.5 TB hard drive and 18GB of ram and the only thing their automated system could temm me was to upgrade my computer??? You cannot speak to a human, and tech support is ARROGANT and took a week to get back to me by email which is useless. If you are a dabbler and don't care about losing your stuff give it a shot it is cheap ish... but you get what you pay for and this software cannot keep up to professional standards and totally let me down as did the PATHETIC customer service! Buy ANYTHING else!!
By scottkaf on 15 Sep 2011 ![]()
advertisement
- BBC admits £100 million IT project was a "waste"
- ISPs offer network-level porn filters to dodge "regulatory threats"
- Intel: PC designs "not compelling enough"
- Microsoft reinstates the Start button – on a mouse
- Facebook tells EE to stall launch of HTC First
- Google considers $1 billion bid for satnav firm Waze
- Hyperoptic extends 1Gbit/sec broadband beyond London
- PC Pro Enhanced: an update
- Samsung racks up ten million Galaxy S4 shipments
- Lenovo defies PC slump to post 90% profit increase
- Is it worth upgrading a media centre to Windows 8?
- Flickr redesign: is it enough to tempt photographers back?
- Hands on with the new Google Maps
- Nokia Lumia 925 review: first look
- Why I won't subscribe to Creative Cloud
- GoPro camera strapped to a remote-control helicopter: the ultimate boy's toy
- Acer Iconia A1 review: first look
- Acer Aspire P3 review: first look
- Acer Aspire R7 review: first look
- How we produce the PC Pro podcast
- 38 best iPad apps
- 35 best web apps
- Software subscriptions return us to a life of servitude
- Dropbox: everything you need to know
- Best smartphones for 2013
- The best broadband speed tests
- iPhone apps for business travel
- How to get a job as a mobile games developer
- 25 best Windows 8 apps
- Introducing Arduino - a simple Raspberry Pi alternative
- The ICO's shame-faced u-turn on cookies
- Start8 and ModernMix: making Windows 8 work on a desktop
- How to boost your mobile reception
- How to fix Facebook: Social Fixer
- Taking the stress out of WordPress updates
- Where to download free web fonts
- Turn your tablet into a Sky+ remote control
- How to measure the success of a new IT system
- Three years on: the state of the tablet market
- Windows 8: what works and what doesn't
advertisement
Software Store
Competitions
There are dozens of exciting prizes up for grabs on PC Pro Competitions. All our competitions are free to enter. Try your luck.
ENTER NOW






