Avira Premium Security Suite 10 review
in Software
Verdict
Not the prettiest security package, but highly configurable and extremely effective
Review Date: 10 May 2010
Reviewed By: Darien Graham-Smith
Price when reviewed: £31 (£36 inc VAT)
Features & Design
![]()
Value for Money
![]()
Ease of Use
![]()
![]()
We’ve regularly praised Avira’s security suite in the past, and this latest version makes only minor changes to the formula. The biggest new feature is the ProActiv module, which identifies potential threats by monitoring application behaviour and pooling information with other Avira users.
It isn’t a new idea – A-List champion Norton Internet Security 2010 has had a very similar feature for nine months – but you can’t complain about Avira catching up. You might, however, grumble when you learn that this major new attraction doesn’t currently work on 64-bit Windows.
Avira 10’s other headline features are a new GenericRepair feature that attempts to undo damage caused by malware, and a lick of virtual paint that brightens up the interface, although it’s still boxy and unintuitive.
Happily, Avira remains a winner thanks to its detection abilities, which through various versions we’ve always found to be excellent. This month, against 247 malware samples, Avira Premium Security Suite 10 achieved a 95% detection rate, equalling our A-List favourite Norton Internet Security 2010 against the same threats.
It remains a lightweight package too. Installing the software raised our test system’s idle RAM footprint from 590MB to 685MB, which is decidedly on the low side for a security suite. In comparison, Norton pushed memory usage up to 722MB.
Best of all, it didn’t add a single second to boot time, although we did see an additional eight seconds of CPU activity after the desktop appeared, compared to a clean system.
Despite this nimbleness, Avira packs in an awful lot of clever technology under the hood. The firewall, for example, gives you plenty of control over which events should cause an alert, and offers the intelligent option of automatically trusting any code certified by a vendor you’ve chosen to whitelist.
You can scan email using either POP3 or IMAP, prevent unknown processes from killing other programs, block suspicious iFrames on the web and even selectively password-protect parts of the interface – useful in partnership with the simple parental web controls. There’s also a backup module, but without online storage.
With all these options, and that unfriendly interface, Avira is likely to be daunting for the typical user. The three-PC licence is slightly more expensive than Norton’s too. But if you’ve only one computer to protect, the option of a single-PC licence lets you save money. And for technical users it’s an excellent choice, combining great detection abilities with a high degree of configurability.
Author: Darien Graham-Smith
From around the web
Avira is excellent,
Recently while I was installing some programs (!) to my Symbian Nokia from internet using PC suite, Avira warns me about the presence of SymbianOS virus! Not only protect my PC but also my Smartphone. Really cool.
By HopeLESS on 12 May 2010 ![]()
waste of money
why on earth does anyone need anything more than the freeware, malware-detection bliss of Avira Personal with the nag screen splash screen switched off?
By gavmeister on 12 May 2010 ![]()
no gmail scan
the auite cant scan secure connection email, so will not work with POP or IMAP gmail, which is a big failing, and was enough for me to go elsewhere after a trial of the product
By zx81zx on 13 May 2010 ![]()
no gmail scan
the auite cant scan secure connection email, so will not work with POP or IMAP gmail, which is a big failing, and was enough for me to go elsewhere after a trial of the product
By zx81zx on 13 May 2010 ![]()
advertisement
- Google legal chief: privacy laws too hard on SMBs
- No free Visual Studio for Windows 8 desktop developers
- Facebook spends $1bn on Instagram... then launches its own Camera app
- Who sends Google the most takedown notices? Microsoft
- Microsoft wins text patent battle against Motorola
- Watchdog fines firm £50,000 over Android malware
- Intel to test smartcity future on London
- June decision on Microsoft's billion-dollar EU fine
- Yahoo browser launch marred by security flaw
- Autonomy management walk out over HP bureaucracy
- Laptop bag reviews: nine tested
- Sony VAIO T Series Ultrabook review: first look
- Revealed: the military standards and robots HP uses to test its laptops
- Windows 8: multi-monitors and double standards?
- Why is TalkTalk's year-old porn filter suddenly big news?
- Why are laptop screens so far behind mobiles?
- HP EliteBook Folio review: first look
- The shoebox-sized all-in-one printer
- Forget the Ultrabook: here comes the HP Sleekbook
- HP Spectre XT review: first look
- Can you buy technology with a clean conscience?
- The death of email
- How to use Windows 8 Metro
- 30 best features of Windows 8
- How to become a cyberspy
- Create your own smart home
- Install a custom ROM on your smartphone
- Can the Raspberry Pi save computing?
- Google: the pirates' best friend?
- Backups: ten tips to keep your data safe
- Why you have to be left in the dark on OS patches
- Is Microsoft mismanaging Windows on ARM?
- Dealing with spam surrogates
- Why 3G broadband can be better and cheaper than ADSL
- Is Twitter bad for business?
- Publishing your email address isn't a security disaster
- Why you'll need a fax machine to develop iOS apps
- Learning to adapt to the mobile web
- Why you shouldn't use WPS on your Wi-Fi network
- Disabled users suffer when software breaks the rules
advertisement






