Symantec Backup Exec 2010 review
in Software
Verdict
Along with a host of other useful features, this latest version of Backup Exec finally offers a deduplication option
Review Date: 7 Apr 2010
Reviewed By: Dave Mitchell
Price when reviewed: £614 (£721 inc VAT)
Features & Design
![]()
Value for Money
![]()
Ease of Use
![]()
![]()
Data deduplication is one of the hottest storage technologies around, but we've had to wait a long time for Symantec to include it in Backup Exec. CA did it nearly a year ago with the A-Listed ARCserve 12.5, and Backup Exec 2010 (BE2010) finally brings Symantec into line with the main competition.
CA includes deduplication at no extra cost. Symantec offers it as a separately chargeable module, but it does provide a few extra features.
CA opted to deduplicate only at the backup server as it's faster and doesn't affect client performance. BE2010 offers client- and server-side deduplication, as well as support for Symantec's OpenStorage technology, which allows it to integrate with intelligent disk services such as its PureDisk and other third-party products. A single deduplication licence allows you to use any two of the three options available.
To implement deduplication, Symantec ported over its NetBackup PureDisk solution, which essentially uses the same hash-based chunking technology as everyone else. Other new features in BE2010 are file and Exchange archiving, which is based on a light version of its Enterprise Vault. There's also support for Server 2008 R2 as a media server and the Core version as a client, a remote agent for Windows 7 and support for vSphere 4.0 and VMware incremental backups.
We loaded Backup Exec 2010 on a Broadberry CyberServe SR1600 rack server equipped with dual 2.8GHz X5560 Xeons and 6GB of DDR3 memory. Installation is swift, and an optional environment check scans the server to ensure it meets the minimum hardware and software requirements.
The base product and multiple components can be selected at the same time and you can also remotely deploy extra media servers and remote agents at this stage. However, the deduplication option is 64-bit only. We didn't spot the brief comment in the manual, and the installation routine allowed us to select the option and install it on a 32-bit version of Server 2008. It was only when we tried to create a deduplication folder that Backup Exec advised us that it wasn't supported, requiring us to reinstall the 64-bit version of the OS.
From around the web
Wait....
...until SP1 or SP2 to come out. Just like with Backup Exec 11D to 12.5D, the product doesn't work properly especially with full system restores to different hardware (when doing DR test rehersals) until its patched.
If ever you ask Symentec about it will only get you one answer "Restores to differing hardware is not supported as we only test the product in a VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENT".
Windows 2008 restores only just about works with 12.5 if fully patched but then 2010 took a backward step with Windows 2008 and 2008 R2. I wouldn't be suprised if the Linux Agents are just a crap as the older versions.
I suggest leaving Backup Exec alone and actually spend money on the one product that works....NetBackup. If only Symentec made a cheaper version of it and scrap Backup Exec.
By ssjandu on 7 Apr 2010 ![]()
advertisement
- VeriSign slammed for security breach cover-up
- SAP willing to share HANA with Oracle
- Why using a tablet could harm your health
- New RIM boss: no need for drastic change
- RIM founders fall on their swords
- Slow economy helps boost Red Hat revenue by 23%
- Google+ pages get multiple admins
- One in five companies lack card industry compliance
- Oil industry warns hacking attacks could kill
- British workers fear email monitoring
- Chrome's shine getting lost in translation
- BytePac: the cardboard hard disk enclosure
- How tech loosens our grip on reality
- Hokum watch: Safer Internet Day
- Why I'm deleting Adobe from my PC
- Prepare to be patronised: it's Safer Internet Day
- Dear Sony, Samsung and every other tech company in the world: stop trying to be Apple
- Will Apple's Final Cut Pro X update placate the pros?
- Smartr Contacts for iPhone review
- Switching to Office 365's Outlook Web App
- Why everyone hates the IT department
- Is online shopping security fundamentally broken?
- New cookie laws: why website owners should be worried
- Are work web blockers a waste of time?
- 11 golden rules for virtualisation
- When is it right to go public with security flaws?
- Is your business ready for VoIP?
- Remote working for small businesses
- The Complete Guide to Office 2010
- The complete guide to Office 2010: Web Apps
- Why virtualisation hasn't slowed the growth of data
- How to make Google AdWords work for your business
- The curse of sloppily written software
- Paying for your crimes with Bitcoin
- Behind the scenes: tech support for Formula 1
- The security risk of fat fingers
- Why Windows Phone 7 isn't quite ready for business
- When will Microsoft stop fiddling with Windows 8?
- Flash down the pan?
- Metro Style apps vs desktop applications
advertisement






