Acronis Backup & Recovery 10
in Software
Verdict
An impressive range of server data protection and recovery, but the data deduplication option has performance issues
Review Date: 30 Nov 2009
Price when reviewed: £761 (£875 inc VAT)
Overall Rating

Features & Design

Value for Money

Ease of Use

Data deduplication has without doubt been the hottest topic in the network storage industry this year, and now Acronis jumps on the bandwagon by implementing it in its disk-imaging software. Offered as an option, this feature is available only with the Advanced Server version of its new Backup & Recovery 10 software.
Acronis provides both file- and block-level deduplication, and has the ability to carry this out at both the source and target. The block-level deduplication technology is fundamentally the same as that used by the majority of other solutions.
Deduplicating at source can place high demands on host resources and to get round this Acronis offers its performance-optimised source deduplication, which creates a shorter hash value using only a small portion of each block. In this scenario the index may have the block already stored, in which case the full hash is computed and checked.
For our central management system and vault repository, we called on a Fujitsu RX330 S1 rack server with dual 2.3GHz quad-core Opterons, 16GB of memory, plus 15K SAS drives and running Server 2008 Enterprise 64-bit. Our first job was to install the central licence server and load on licence keys; you'll need a key for each managed system and another for every one you want to apply deduplication to.
Managed vaults are created within the storage node where you define the drives and folders for the vault location and its associated indexing database. During creation we also enabled data compression, but you can't encrypt a deduplicating vault.
Backup policies make light work of securing data on multiple systems as you browse the network and add each one along with global definitions on what files, folders, volumes or drives you want copied.
Acronis has no published claims about deduplication ratios, so we used our standard set of tests to find out what it could do. Using a 4.5GB data set consisting of 600 files, we introduced controlled changes within a percentage of the files during a standard backup strategy consisting of daily incrementals and weekly full backups.
After the first full backup was completed, 2% of the data was modified in 40% of the files prior to each subsequent backup. After a two-week simulation, we saw Acronis deliver a reasonable deduplication ratio of 3.4:1.
We also ran a full backup of a 44GB data volume on a remote Windows server. On completion the size of the vault and index database was 29.2GB, resulting in an initial deduplication ratio of 1.5:1 and a storage saving of about 33%.
That's the good news, and now the bad. Whenever a backup is directed to a deduplicating vault, an indexing task is fired up afterwards to populate the database with the hashes of new blocks. Acronis advised us that it does this to improve backup performance and that indexing should run at speeds of around 20GB/hour. Unfortunately, we found it could be much slower.
This wasn't an issue with our data- rate change test, as each incremental copied 1.8GB of new data and the corresponding indexing task took around five minutes. However, for the 44GB backup of the remote server, the subsequent indexing job took an unbelievable 17 hours for an average speed of 2.5GB/hour.
The biggest problem with these indexing tasks is that they lock the vault while they're running. This means you can't run further backups to that archive or recover data or volumes from it when an indexing job is running. Consequently, if your daily rate of change of data is high then Acronis' deduplication definitely isn't for you.
We've always been impressed with the level of backup, restore and disaster recovery features offered by Acronis' imaging software. You still get the same high level of features with Advanced Server 10, but the deduplication option isn't as slick as that offered free with the A-Listed ARCserve Backup 12.5 and indexing performance severely limits its appeal.
Author: Dave Mitchell
advertisement
- Microsoft Visual Studio 2010 hits Release Candidate
- Free Office 2010 upgrades for Office 2007 buyers
- Microsoft promises monster Patch Tuesday
- Sun boss Schwartz signs off with a strange Tweet
- Office 2010 hits Release Candidate
- Windows Mobile 6.5.3 spices up Sony Ericsson Aspen
- Google Apps drops support for IE6
- Critical systems facing attacks from foreign powers
- Oracle predicts bright future for Sun
- BT spells out 12Mbits/sec fibre guarantee
- 10 ways to boost traffic to a WordPress blog
- Reaction to the Apple iPad: ten days later
- How to switch off Virgin Media's mobile broadband image compression
- Infotec/Ricoh: here not to help
- TomTom 940T vs iPhone TomTom: a real road test
- Nvidia Fermi update: they have names!
- Twitter oven lets you have your cake and tweet it
- Where online businesses go terribly wrong
- Google Nexus One: first look review
- Dreading the move to ADSL
- 50 ways to work faster
- The ten rules of building a small business network
- What to look for when buying a business laptop
- How to start a low-risk web business
- How to put your business on LinkedIn
- How to put your business on Facebook
- How to put your business on Twitter
- How to make your business soar on social networks
- How to make your business greener
- Expert guide to Windows Home Server
- The hidden treasures of Sysinternals
- Microsoft must stop silently installing browser plugins
- Crack the Microsoft Server 2008 Core with CoreConfig
- Forget Windows: SMBs should try Snow Leopard Server
- Poking into Facebook security
- Has Microsoft shot itself in the foot with Security Essentials?
- Smashing the BlackBerry myths
- Has Microsoft solved our stylesheet woes with Super Preview?
- Automated printing of SQL Server Reports
- Setting up iSCSI on a desktop PC
advertisement
Printed from www.pcpro.co.uk







