F-Secure Internet Security 2010 review
Great protection, but there are some wrinkles to be ironed out of the new interface
Review Date: 22 Sep 2009
Reviewed By: Darien Graham-Smith
Price when reviewed: £26 (£30 inc VAT)
Features & Design
Value for Money
Ease of Use
The big thing that's new about F-Secure's 2010 security suite is its revamped front end. It's certainly cleaner than the old design, which over the years had come to look pretty clunky.
Alas, it isn't as big an improvement as perhaps was intended: the big buttons merely open further displays, and finding the feature you want isn't much easier than with the old system. For example, details of your protection are hidden behind the Status button, but if you see something you want to change you have to come out and go hit the Tasks button instead.
The default installation now includes parental controls as well. This is more of a pain than it sounds, since it requires you to enter your password to (among other things) allow a program through the firewall. And that happens more often than you'd expect; during our tests, F-Secure 2010 complained about network access requests from Live Mesh and Windows Media Player, which it surely ought to know about.
On the plus side, the firewall proved perfectly robust at repelling intruders. Our attacking computer was unable to confirm the existence of the test PC, even while the client machine was happily able to communicate back and forth over the internet.
Malware detection was good too. Although the software took several minutes to churn through this month's collection of malware, it identified 96% of our threats, just 2% behind our A-List choice, Avira Premium Security Suite. That figure includes a generic trojan (identified by F-Secure as IS.585803), which Avira missed.
When it comes to resource usage, there's good and bad news. F-Secure added a relatively small overhead to a running system, with system RAM usage under Vista resting at 602MB, compared to 595MB with Avira and 477MB for a bare Windows installation.
But the suite added four seconds to our boot time, and then spent 12 seconds grinding the CPU in two big spikes - one shortly after the Windows desktop appeared, one around a minute later - before settling down. Most annoyingly, the software brings up a self-important splash screen at every boot, which for us appeared an infuriating 20 seconds or so after the desktop had appeared - and there's no obvious way to disable it.
F-Secure's underlying detection and firewall engines are clearly sound, and the price is reasonable by security suite standards. Hopefully, next year's iteration will turn the package into a slick contender. Right now, however, alternatives such as Avira or Kaspersky provide comparable protection and are simply more pleasant to use.
Author: Darien Graham-Smith
Long Term F-Secure Usage
I would just like to say that as someone who works in the education sector as a ICT Network Administrator who is also a MCP/MCDST/MCTS/MCITP Microsoft Certified Professional. I have been using F Secure since 2006 - excellent value, good parental controls on both my kids PC's. I have been a beta tester for them and when I moved to Vista Ultimate 64Bit they sent me a version that would cover me and worked fine, yes the splash screen can be a bit annoying but living with it day to day you learn to ignore it. Personally F-Secure has never failed me and I recomend it to many people when I perform new builds or reconfigurations. It gets my vote and five stars from me. I have it on 2 Windows XP machines (both kids) and my vista machine at home , I also have machines with comodo internet security (Free!) and AVG (also Free!) and Symantec Corporate. I feel that F Secure has the lowest resource impact of them all.
By JM1965 on 24 Sep 2009
Disabling the Splash Screen
Although not obvious the splash screen displayed during startup can be disabled by removing the /splash qualifier from the registry entry for F-Secure Manager in HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\Curr
By Deepinsight on 17 Sep 2010
- Europol warns: public Wi-Fi isn't safe
- Privacy groups challenge Facebook's WhatsApp buy
- IDC: iPad intertia opens door for Windows tablets
- Chip breakthrough to eliminate checkout queues
- Rivals put on notice as Spotify snaps up The Echo Nest
- Windows 8.1 Update 1 leaks via Microsoft's website
- Bitcoin "founder" says: you've got the wrong man
- Has bitcoin creator been found?
- HTC Desire 310: more competition for the Moto G
- Mozilla questions why Dell charges £16 to install Firefox
- Move over Delia: IBM Watson is cooking tonight
- Eric Schmidt on the double-edged smartphone: friend and foe
- Getty joins the race to the bottom
- Hour of Code: five steps to learn how to code
- Sony Xperia Z2 Tablet review: first look
- Sony Xperia Z2 review: first look
- Samsung Galaxy Gear 2 review: first look
- Nokia XL review: first look
- Samsung Galaxy S5 review: first look
- Nokia X review: first look
- Make the most of your mobile data
- Old-school internet scams: five that just won't die
- Bitcoin believers not worried by Mt. Gox disarray
- How to hack your car
- Small server vs cloud: which is best for SMBs?
- Block party: why do millions play Minecraft?
- What to do if you’re still on Windows XP
- Microsoft Word: top 20 secret features
- Measuring me: is your body the future of security?
- The best mobile apps for business
- Windows Server 2012 R2: how the Datacenter edition could change SMBs
- Invoices and VAT: how to set up your documents correctly
- Nexus 5 vs Samsung Galaxy S4 Active: the best phone for avoiding screen burn
- How much is a social user worth?
- The key to choosing a secure password
- Thunderbolt Bridge: a fast Mac migration tool
- Should you advertise on Twitter?
- How to track a lost smartphone
- Self-publishing success: the best way to sell your book
- 1.6TB SSD: why would you need one?