F-Secure Internet Security 2010 review
Great protection, but there are some wrinkles to be ironed out of the new interface
Review Date: 22 Sep 2009
Reviewed By: Darien Graham-Smith
Price when reviewed: £26 (£30 inc VAT)
Features & Design
Value for Money
Ease of Use
The big thing that's new about F-Secure's 2010 security suite is its revamped front end. It's certainly cleaner than the old design, which over the years had come to look pretty clunky.
Alas, it isn't as big an improvement as perhaps was intended: the big buttons merely open further displays, and finding the feature you want isn't much easier than with the old system. For example, details of your protection are hidden behind the Status button, but if you see something you want to change you have to come out and go hit the Tasks button instead.
The default installation now includes parental controls as well. This is more of a pain than it sounds, since it requires you to enter your password to (among other things) allow a program through the firewall. And that happens more often than you'd expect; during our tests, F-Secure 2010 complained about network access requests from Live Mesh and Windows Media Player, which it surely ought to know about.
On the plus side, the firewall proved perfectly robust at repelling intruders. Our attacking computer was unable to confirm the existence of the test PC, even while the client machine was happily able to communicate back and forth over the internet.
Malware detection was good too. Although the software took several minutes to churn through this month's collection of malware, it identified 96% of our threats, just 2% behind our A-List choice, Avira Premium Security Suite. That figure includes a generic trojan (identified by F-Secure as IS.585803), which Avira missed.
When it comes to resource usage, there's good and bad news. F-Secure added a relatively small overhead to a running system, with system RAM usage under Vista resting at 602MB, compared to 595MB with Avira and 477MB for a bare Windows installation.
But the suite added four seconds to our boot time, and then spent 12 seconds grinding the CPU in two big spikes - one shortly after the Windows desktop appeared, one around a minute later - before settling down. Most annoyingly, the software brings up a self-important splash screen at every boot, which for us appeared an infuriating 20 seconds or so after the desktop had appeared - and there's no obvious way to disable it.
F-Secure's underlying detection and firewall engines are clearly sound, and the price is reasonable by security suite standards. Hopefully, next year's iteration will turn the package into a slick contender. Right now, however, alternatives such as Avira or Kaspersky provide comparable protection and are simply more pleasant to use.
Author: Darien Graham-Smith
Long Term F-Secure Usage
I would just like to say that as someone who works in the education sector as a ICT Network Administrator who is also a MCP/MCDST/MCTS/MCITP Microsoft Certified Professional. I have been using F Secure since 2006 - excellent value, good parental controls on both my kids PC's. I have been a beta tester for them and when I moved to Vista Ultimate 64Bit they sent me a version that would cover me and worked fine, yes the splash screen can be a bit annoying but living with it day to day you learn to ignore it. Personally F-Secure has never failed me and I recomend it to many people when I perform new builds or reconfigurations. It gets my vote and five stars from me. I have it on 2 Windows XP machines (both kids) and my vista machine at home , I also have machines with comodo internet security (Free!) and AVG (also Free!) and Symantec Corporate. I feel that F Secure has the lowest resource impact of them all.
By JM1965 on 24 Sep 2009
Disabling the Splash Screen
Although not obvious the splash screen displayed during startup can be disabled by removing the /splash qualifier from the registry entry for F-Secure Manager in HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\Curr
By Deepinsight on 17 Sep 2010
- Nokia Lumia 2520 tablet sales halted over faulty charger
- Microsoft slashes custom XP support price
- Amazon Phone: does anyone want a 3D handset?
- Virgin email fiasco hits thousands of users
- Chrome Remote Desktop now available on Android
- Google posts "average quarter" with slow growth
- What's on this week's PC Pro podcast?
- BBC iPlayer lets Android devices download shows
- Google's Project Ara modular phone arrives in January
- Hackers harvest LaCie card data for a full year
- Windows 8.1 Update: an abject surrender
- The insane economics of Sky Now TV
- No such thing as a free app... so pay up if you want quality
- Time to outlaw crapware-laden installers
- Windows Phone 8.1 video: hands-on
- Office for iPad: key information
- Why every PC buyer owes Richard Durkin a debt of gratitude
- HTC One M8 vs Samsung Galaxy S5: 2014's big-hitters compared
- Windows XP end of life: key information
- Cut out the broadband jargon? What jargon?
- The great iPhone ripoff and how it works
- Heartbleed: what you need to know and do
- Data recovery: inside the clean room
- Best tablet PCs to buy in 2014
- How much RAM do you really need?
- News of the weird: the strangest ever tech stories
- Five hyped technologies: disruptive or not?
- Piracy's dying: why we're all going straight
- Office: should you buy it, rent it - or dump it?
- Make the most of your mobile data
- Make your mobile battery last longer
- Small steps into handling Big Data
- Nexus 5: does it really run stock Android?
- How to get broadband to a garden office
- How to write your company's IT security policy
- Raspberry Pi and Wolfram: a must-have for every child
- Could you get by with Office Web Apps?
- The best Android antivirus apps for 2014
- Headings vs headers: how to use both in Word
- Windows Server 2012 R2: how the Datacenter edition could change SMBs