Kaspersky Internet Security 2010 review
in Software
Verdict
A powerful and capable suite, though it's not the easiest to use, nor the cheapest
Review Date: 3 Sep 2009
Reviewed By: Darien Graham-Smith
Price when reviewed: £35 (£40 inc VAT)
Buy it now for: £40
(see more store prices)
Features & Design
![]()
Value for Money
![]()
Ease of Use
![]()
Kaspersky Internet Security 2010 has arrived rather early this year, yet it brings several upgrades that make clear the team hasn't been rushing to release.
The first change you'll notice is the interface, which has received its annual overhaul. The front end uses big, clear tabs and more white space than before: at first glance it looks exceptionally friendly. Unfortunately, behind this clean design lurk a plethora of links and sub-panes, and though the suite is pleasingly configurable, it's not as simple to get where you're going as it is with, for example, G Data.
Naturally, there are some technical updates too. One you might notice is the browser toolbar for Internet Explorer and Firefox, which now includes a button to launch a mouse-controlled onscreen keyboard. You can use this to defeat keyloggers.
Another new feature is Safe Run, which lets you run any program you're uncertain about in a sandboxed environment where it can't access your system files. Safe Run a browser and you're immune to drive-by downloads. Kaspersky 2010 also makes smarter use of online resources when scanning: bad files can be instantly blacklisted from a central database, while whitelisted files don't need to be fully scanned, saving time.
Other additions include improved rootkit detection, IM monitoring and web advert suppression, but thankfully all these extras don't make Kaspersky a bloated suite. On our test system, the suite added a mere six seconds to boot-up time, including just one extra second of CPU activity after the desktop appeared. The total system RAM footprint with the suite installed rose from 528MB to 611MB – almost as low as Avira's 595MB.
The firewall remains one of our favourites too: as with previous versions, as soon as we attempted to prove the system, Kaspersky leapt in and blocked our attacking PC.
Sadly, when it came to intercepting malware samples, Kaspersky took only a silver medal, with a detection rate of 88% - falling just a smidgen behind the 91% achieved by G Data and Avira. Notably, several of these samples weren't identified by name but were flagged because of their potential behaviour. We'd have liked to see evidence of a more comprehensive database, but such effective behaviour detection is encouraging, as it shows Kaspersky can even intercept threats it hasn't seen before.
If Kaspersky Internet Security 2010 had detected just a few more samples, and if it were just a little cheaper, we could have been be looking at a new A List winner. Sadly, it doesn't quite take the crown in those areas, but it remains a credible and powerful suite that's well worth a look.
Author: Darien Graham-Smith
Best Prices
Price comparison powered by 
| Prices, delivery and availability at 3 retailers | Go | |
|
£40 | Go |
|
£47 | Go |
From around the web
Impressed with Kaspersky 2010
I downloaded a trial of the Kaspersky Anti virus because I am working on a mine site in Africa with an open non secured web connection. In addition people on the site or coming to the site share data by means of memory sticks etc so you can guess the problems we get.
I was (and I still am) so impressed with the trial I purchased the 2010 Kaspersky suite. Previously I used the Freebies, AVG, Zone Alarm etc. Kaspersky not only detects far more than the others, it also cleans far better. AVG has a habit of saying it has cleaned something when it hasn't.
All I can say is that the ones on your A list must be super fantastic, because to describe the Kaspersky suite as fantastic would be an understatement. I would recommend this to anyone.
By deedub93 on 6 Oct 2009 ![]()
advertisement
- LinkedIn revenue doubles as membership soars
- Kodak kills off cameras
- UK broadband project spending £1m on legal fees
- Microsoft: Windows on ARM won't be sold separately
- Intel pays five hours of profits to settle antitrust case
- Windows 8 on ARM to run desktop apps... but only Office
- Ofcom dithers over plans to tackle broadband slamming
- Data boost bolsters Vodafone revenue
- Google working on cloud storage system
- Lenovo's profit leaps 54% on market gains
- Chrome's shine getting lost in translation
- BytePac: the cardboard hard disk enclosure
- How tech loosens our grip on reality
- Hokum watch: Safer Internet Day
- Why I'm deleting Adobe from my PC
- Prepare to be patronised: it's Safer Internet Day
- Dear Sony, Samsung and every other tech company in the world: stop trying to be Apple
- Will Apple's Final Cut Pro X update placate the pros?
- Smartr Contacts for iPhone review
- Switching to Office 365's Outlook Web App
- The ultimate guide to passwords
- How Apple lulls Mac owners into a false sense of security
- Privacy - outdated luxury or public necessity?
- Building the bionic man
- The making of open-source software
- Top 10 stupid security stories of 2011
- 10 techs to watch in 2012
- PC Pro's favourite tech products of 2011
- 10 most read articles on PC Pro in 2011
- 50 ways to make your PC better
- Why virtualisation hasn't slowed the growth of data
- How to make Google AdWords work for your business
- The curse of sloppily written software
- Paying for your crimes with Bitcoin
- Behind the scenes: tech support for Formula 1
- The security risk of fat fingers
- Why Windows Phone 7 isn't quite ready for business
- When will Microsoft stop fiddling with Windows 8?
- Flash down the pan?
- Metro Style apps vs desktop applications
advertisement






