Apple Final Cut Studio 3 review
in Software
Verdict
There's so much to like about this polished, professional package that it might just be worth switching operating systems to get hold of it
Review Date: 18 Aug 2009
Reviewed By: Ben Pitt
Price when reviewed: £695 (£799 inc VAT)
Features & Design
![]()
Value for Money
![]()
![]()
It isn't often we review software that's only available for the Mac, but Final Cut Studio demands that we make an exception. While most people choose their operating system first and applications second, anyone considering spending £800 on video-editing software is likely to specify their hardware to meet the needs of the software.
As with any video-editing application, Final Cut Studio requires some substantial hardware, and fortunately the Mac Pro range delivers it. Prices start at £1,899 for a 2.66GHz quad-core Xeon system, while two 2.93GHz quad-core Xeon processors, 8GB RAM and 2TB storage costs around £5,000.
Final Cut Studio comprises six applications. Final Cut Pro 7 handles non-linear editing duties, while Motion 4 is a compositing tool in the same vein as Adobe After Effects. Soundtrack Pro 3 is a multitrack audio editor that's geared towards video production, Color 1.5 performs sophisticated colour grading, and Compressor 3.5 is a video-encoding utility.
DVD Studio Pro 4 handles DVD authoring, and remains largely unchanged since 2005. It's hard to criticise its DVD-authoring prowess, but the lack of comprehensive Blu-ray authoring in Final Cut Studio is worrying. Apple's reservations about Blu-ray are well documented, but it isn't Apple's place to snub this format on Final Cut Studio users' behalf.
Final Cut Pro
Final Cut Pro's interface has much in common with Adobe Premiere Pro CS4, and it didn't take us long to feel at home. Its smaller buttons and text allow it to pack a lot of information onscreen, but it still manages to look elegant and friendly.
Most of the operational differences compared to Premiere Pro are subtle. There's little to choose between their video effects libraries, but the way in which Final Cut Pro presents its effects parameters, keyframes and BŽzier curves all in the same place is tidier than Premiere Pro's approach.
This latest version of Final Cut Pro has a significant advantage when it comes to slow- and fast-motion playback. It already had excellent curve-based tools for precise vari-speed playback, but it's now possible to drag specific frames in a clip to a point on the timeline, whereupon the playback speed is adjusted as necessary either side of this point. This level of precision makes Premiere Pro's speed controls seem unwieldy by comparison.
Arguably, the single most important feature in a non-linear editor is its real-time preview performance. Here, Final Cut Pro takes a decisive lead. This is largely down to Apple's ProRes 422 codecs, which are optimised for Final Cut Pro running on multiple-core processors. Version 6 included two flavours of ProRes, running at 145Mbits/sec and 220Mbits/sec. While their quality and preview performance is excellent, they put quite a strain on the hard disk.
Version 7 introduces an extended set of ProRes codecs. 422 LT runs at 100Mbits/sec and is barely distinguishable from the 145Mbits/sec version. 422 Proxy drops the bit rate to 45Mbits/sec and, although it displays some JPEG-like artefacts, it's a useful option. Its name is potentially misleading, though, since Final Cut Pro has no provision for proxy editing (whereby the original files are recalled for export) without the help of Final Cut Server, which costs another £799. ProRes 4444 runs at 330Mbits/sec and delivers lossless HD video with alpha channel support and no chroma subsampling. It's ideal for exchanging complex sequences between Final Cut Pro and Motion.
From around the web
Software for the operating system?
When I was growing up and studying computing, then working in IT, you always chose the software and then looked to see which operating system and hardware were required - at least for the main packages, subsidiary applications could usually be found.
Still, when the hardware "only" cost half a million and the software 5-6 million, it made some sense. ;-)
By big_D on 18 Aug 2009 ![]()
Colour Finesse in CS4
Interesting review.
As an aside, CS3 and CS4 do ship with an excellent colour grading suite - it just nobody actually seems to know about it. Not helped by Adobe's lack of any information.
It's called Colour Finesse, appears as an AE plugin and is an extremely capable grading program.
By ricksters on 19 Aug 2009 ![]()
advertisement
- LinkedIn revenue doubles as membership soars
- Kodak kills off cameras
- UK broadband project spending £1m on legal fees
- Microsoft: Windows on ARM won't be sold separately
- Intel pays five hours of profits to settle antitrust case
- Windows 8 on ARM to run desktop apps... but only Office
- Ofcom dithers over plans to tackle broadband slamming
- Data boost bolsters Vodafone revenue
- Google working on cloud storage system
- Lenovo's profit leaps 54% on market gains
- Chrome's shine getting lost in translation
- BytePac: the cardboard hard disk enclosure
- How tech loosens our grip on reality
- Hokum watch: Safer Internet Day
- Why I'm deleting Adobe from my PC
- Prepare to be patronised: it's Safer Internet Day
- Dear Sony, Samsung and every other tech company in the world: stop trying to be Apple
- Will Apple's Final Cut Pro X update placate the pros?
- Smartr Contacts for iPhone review
- Switching to Office 365's Outlook Web App
- The ultimate guide to passwords
- How Apple lulls Mac owners into a false sense of security
- Privacy - outdated luxury or public necessity?
- Building the bionic man
- The making of open-source software
- Top 10 stupid security stories of 2011
- 10 techs to watch in 2012
- PC Pro's favourite tech products of 2011
- 10 most read articles on PC Pro in 2011
- 50 ways to make your PC better
- Why virtualisation hasn't slowed the growth of data
- How to make Google AdWords work for your business
- The curse of sloppily written software
- Paying for your crimes with Bitcoin
- Behind the scenes: tech support for Formula 1
- The security risk of fat fingers
- Why Windows Phone 7 isn't quite ready for business
- When will Microsoft stop fiddling with Windows 8?
- Flash down the pan?
- Metro Style apps vs desktop applications
advertisement





