Skip to navigation

Apple Final Cut Studio 3 review

in Software

Verdict

There's so much to like about this polished, professional package that it might just be worth switching operating systems to get hold of it

Review Date: 18 Aug 2009

Reviewed By: Ben Pitt

Price when reviewed: £695 (£799 inc VAT)

Overall Rating
5 stars out of 6

Features & Design
5 stars out of 6

Value for Money
6 stars out of 6

PCPRO Recommended

It isn't often we review software that's only available for the Mac, but Final Cut Studio demands that we make an exception. While most people choose their operating system first and applications second, anyone considering spending £800 on video-editing software is likely to specify their hardware to meet the needs of the software.

As with any video-editing application, Final Cut Studio requires some substantial hardware, and fortunately the Mac Pro range delivers it. Prices start at £1,899 for a 2.66GHz quad-core Xeon system, while two 2.93GHz quad-core Xeon processors, 8GB RAM and 2TB storage costs around £5,000.

Final Cut Studio comprises six applications. Final Cut Pro 7 handles non-linear editing duties, while Motion 4 is a compositing tool in the same vein as Adobe After Effects. Soundtrack Pro 3 is a multitrack audio editor that's geared towards video production, Color 1.5 performs sophisticated colour grading, and Compressor 3.5 is a video-encoding utility.

DVD Studio Pro 4 handles DVD authoring, and remains largely unchanged since 2005. It's hard to criticise its DVD-authoring prowess, but the lack of comprehensive Blu-ray authoring in Final Cut Studio is worrying. Apple's reservations about Blu-ray are well documented, but it isn't Apple's place to snub this format on Final Cut Studio users' behalf.

Final Cut Pro

Final Cut Pro's interface has much in common with Adobe Premiere Pro CS4, and it didn't take us long to feel at home. Its smaller buttons and text allow it to pack a lot of information onscreen, but it still manages to look elegant and friendly.

Most of the operational differences compared to Premiere Pro are subtle. There's little to choose between their video effects libraries, but the way in which Final Cut Pro presents its effects parameters, keyframes and BŽzier curves all in the same place is tidier than Premiere Pro's approach.

ShareThis latest version of Final Cut Pro has a significant advantage when it comes to slow- and fast-motion playback. It already had excellent curve-based tools for precise vari-speed playback, but it's now possible to drag specific frames in a clip to a point on the timeline, whereupon the playback speed is adjusted as necessary either side of this point. This level of precision makes Premiere Pro's speed controls seem unwieldy by comparison.

Arguably, the single most important feature in a non-linear editor is its real-time preview performance. Here, Final Cut Pro takes a decisive lead. This is largely down to Apple's ProRes 422 codecs, which are optimised for Final Cut Pro running on multiple-core processors. Version 6 included two flavours of ProRes, running at 145Mbits/sec and 220Mbits/sec. While their quality and preview performance is excellent, they put quite a strain on the hard disk.

Version 7 introduces an extended set of ProRes codecs. 422 LT runs at 100Mbits/sec and is barely distinguishable from the 145Mbits/sec version. 422 Proxy drops the bit rate to 45Mbits/sec and, although it displays some JPEG-like artefacts, it's a useful option. Its name is potentially misleading, though, since Final Cut Pro has no provision for proxy editing (whereby the original files are recalled for export) without the help of Final Cut Server, which costs another £799. ProRes 4444 runs at 330Mbits/sec and delivers lossless HD video with alpha channel support and no chroma subsampling. It's ideal for exchanging complex sequences between Final Cut Pro and Motion.

1 2 3
Subscribe to PC Pro magazine. We'll give you 3 issues for £1 plus a free gift - click here

From around the web

User comments

Software for the operating system?

When I was growing up and studying computing, then working in IT, you always chose the software and then looked to see which operating system and hardware were required - at least for the main packages, subsidiary applications could usually be found.

Still, when the hardware "only" cost half a million and the software 5-6 million, it made some sense. ;-)

By big_D on 18 Aug 2009

Colour Finesse in CS4

Interesting review.

As an aside, CS3 and CS4 do ship with an excellent colour grading suite - it just nobody actually seems to know about it. Not helped by Adobe's lack of any information.

It's called Colour Finesse, appears as an AE plugin and is an extremely capable grading program.

By ricksters on 19 Aug 2009

Leave a comment

You need to Login or Register to comment.

(optional)

Latest Software Reviews
Corel AfterShot Pro review

Corel AfterShot Pro

Category: Software
Rating: 5 out of 6
Price: £80
FXhome HitFilm Ultimate review

FXhome HitFilm Ultimate

Category: Software
Rating: 6 out of 6
Price: £284
Steinberg Sequel 3 review

Steinberg Sequel 3

Category: Software
Rating: 4 out of 6
Price: £60
Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 4 Beta review

Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 4 Beta

Rating: 4 out of 6
Price: £60
ACDSee Pro 5 review

ACDSee Pro 5

Category: Software
Rating: 4 out of 6
Price: £152

advertisement

Most Commented Reviews
More From PC Pro
Latest News Stories Subscribe to our RSS Feeds
Latest Blog Posts Subscribe to our RSS Feeds
Latest Features
Latest Real World Computing

advertisement

Sponsored Links
 
 
SEARCH
SIGN UP

Your email:

Your password:

remember me

advertisement


Hitwise Top 10 Website 2010
 
 

PCPro-Computing in the Real World Printed from www.pcpro.co.uk

Register to receive our regular email newsletter at http://www.pcpro.co.uk/registration.

The newsletter contains links to our latest PC news, product reviews, features and how-to guides, plus special offers and competitions.