Norton Internet Security 2009 review
Lighter than ever, but its all-round performance isn't quite first class.
Review Date: 13 Feb 2009
Reviewed By: Darien Graham-Smith
Price when reviewed: £43 (£49 inc VAT)
Value for Money
Ease of Use
Norton Internet Security 2009 impressed us when it first appeared in September. It's the lightest Norton suite yet, and its resource demands compare favourably to the competition - although in this month's tests Eset and Kaspersky managed to slightly undercut its RAM requirements.
In our earlier look at the package we were also impressed to see Norton achieve malware detection rates comparable with those of Kaspersky, then our A-List choice. With 86% in this month's test, Norton still came within 2% of its Russian rival. Sadly, in this company such scores fall short of the winners' podium.
When it came to web threats, Norton dropped further behind, flagging up only 34% of our malicious sites. Its defence against our network attacks wasn't this month's most convincing, either: like McAfee, it left three TCP ports open along with a few other high-risk vulnerabilities.
It's a shame, because Norton Internet Security 2009 has obviously been designed with excellent intentions. Not only is it lightweight, it's also one of this month's least obtrusive suites, warning you of malware detections with a small, self-closing pop-up in the bottom-right of the screen. It doesn't visibly modify your email client, either.
Unfortunately, this well-meaning reticence can be frustrating for technical users. Requesters can be vague about which virus was found or where, and the juicy details are buried behind an overcomplicated interface. All the same, NIS 2009 is a very welcome advance over previous Norton products.
Author: Darien Graham-Smith
- Virgin's superfast broadband coming to East London
- BT Openreach: we need to do better on customer service
- BT: Tech City's broadband is fine - startups just need to pay more
- City of London slams BT for "unacceptable" broadband
- Those parental-control filters? As few as 4% are signing up
- National Parks want faster mobile broadband
- Government broadband plans "lack ambition"
- BT denies that Tech City lacks superfast broadband
- One in five websites blocked by ISPs
- Ofcom to regulate BT's fibre prices
- How to turn off Google Location Tracking
- 20 years of PC Pro: our greatest review mistakes
- 20 years of PC Pro: our first A-List
- Wikipedia's "right to be forgotten" protest hits the wrong note
- 3D printing hits the high street for plastic selfies
- 20 years of PC Pro: What amazed us in our first issue
- How Google Glass ruined my lunch hour
- Smartphone battery packs: can a USB power pack beat the festival battery blues?
- Windows Easy Transfer – not so "easy" in Windows 8.1
- Formula 1: what a difference virtualisation makes
- What’s the best 4G network in the UK?
- The best broadband speed tests
- How fibre broadband transformed Cornwall
- The best business broadband: how to choose the right package
- How to get faster broadband: tips & tricks
- Choosing your web hosting package: space, bandwidth, service-level agreements and email handling
- ISPs must sabotage your broadband to survive
- Fibre broadband: the facts
- Will Britain get Europe's best broadband?
- The mobile data rip-off