Norton Internet Security 2009 review
Lighter than ever, but its all-round performance isn't quite first class.
Review Date: 13 Feb 2009
Reviewed By: Darien Graham-Smith
Price when reviewed: £43 (£49 inc VAT)
Value for Money
Ease of Use
Norton Internet Security 2009 impressed us when it first appeared in September. It's the lightest Norton suite yet, and its resource demands compare favourably to the competition - although in this month's tests Eset and Kaspersky managed to slightly undercut its RAM requirements.
In our earlier look at the package we were also impressed to see Norton achieve malware detection rates comparable with those of Kaspersky, then our A-List choice. With 86% in this month's test, Norton still came within 2% of its Russian rival. Sadly, in this company such scores fall short of the winners' podium.
When it came to web threats, Norton dropped further behind, flagging up only 34% of our malicious sites. Its defence against our network attacks wasn't this month's most convincing, either: like McAfee, it left three TCP ports open along with a few other high-risk vulnerabilities.
It's a shame, because Norton Internet Security 2009 has obviously been designed with excellent intentions. Not only is it lightweight, it's also one of this month's least obtrusive suites, warning you of malware detections with a small, self-closing pop-up in the bottom-right of the screen. It doesn't visibly modify your email client, either.
Unfortunately, this well-meaning reticence can be frustrating for technical users. Requesters can be vague about which virus was found or where, and the juicy details are buried behind an overcomplicated interface. All the same, NIS 2009 is a very welcome advance over previous Norton products.
Author: Darien Graham-Smith
- Ofcom: cable broadband is faster than fibre
- BT hits 800Mbits/sec using copper lines
- Narrow trenches help Virgin expand fibre network
- Virgin's superfast broadband coming to East London
- BT Openreach: we need to do better on customer service
- BT: Tech City's broadband is fine - startups just need to pay more
- City of London slams BT for "unacceptable" broadband
- Those parental-control filters? As few as 4% are signing up
- National Parks want faster mobile broadband
- Government broadband plans "lack ambition"
- Google Glass: mugger bait, pub problem and other lessons learned from two dangerous weeks
- Twitter, please don't fiddle with my feed
- How Satya Nadella can get some pay-raise karma
- Windows 10: a step back to go forward
- Michael Dell: Cloud infrastructure is the roads, bridges and highways of the 21st century
- How to check your identity hasn’t been sold to the hackers
- Tim Cook: this is how much TV has changed since the 70s
- Westminster wins the .London battle
- 20 years of PC Pro: from deep pan pizza to virtualisation
- Five reasons why the Apple Watch leaves me cold
- What’s the best 4G network in the UK?
- The best broadband speed tests
- How fibre broadband transformed Cornwall
- The best business broadband: how to choose the right package
- How to get faster broadband: tips & tricks
- Choosing your web hosting package: space, bandwidth, service-level agreements and email handling
- ISPs must sabotage your broadband to survive
- Fibre broadband: the facts
- Will Britain get Europe's best broadband?
- The mobile data rip-off