F-Secure Internet Security 2009 review
A credible contender, but not the lightest or the most effective.
Review Date: 13 Feb 2009
Reviewed By: Darien Graham-Smith
Price when reviewed: £34 (£39 inc VAT)
Value for Money
Ease of Use
F-Secure acquitted itself with honour this month, but didn't quite break into the top rank. Its 87% score in our malware test was creditable; its 37% in our web threats test less so. Its strongest suit was its firewall, which managed to conceal our PC from would-be attackers, so that our security scan couldn't even confirm the machine was switched on.
In many ways, F-Secure is pleasing to use too. Its main interface is compact and clean, although this is largely achieved by hiding controls - six main tabs contain more than 30 links, which open further configuration panels. These might be daunting for beginners, but they mainly follow Windows user interface guidelines, and will feel intuitive to more knowledgeable users.
We also liked the simplicity of its email integration. F-Secure didn't add any buttons or toolbars to our mail client, but simply brought up a summary window when infected mail was found, detailing the nature of the threat and the action taken.
Unfortunately, simple doesn't necessarily mean nimble: F-Secure Internet Security 2009 had one of the largest RAM footprints of any suite this month, and slow startup times. That's hard to excuse given its relatively sparse feature set - just the bare essentials plus parental controls.
If you have three PCs to protect, F-Secure is reasonable value (£50 exc VAT for a two-year licence), and unusually it comes with a bootable Linux-based recovery CD - a nice touch. It's not ideal for everyone, but technical users may appreciate its no-nonsense approach.
Author: Darien Graham-Smith
- Bug hunters paid to target Oculus Rift
- Chrome to warn against crapware downloads
- Microsoft backtracks on blocking out-of-date Java
- WarKitteh, hacked Blackphone and more from Def Con
- Putting the brakes on smart-car attacks and more from Black Hat 2014
- Microsoft targets Windows in next Patch Tuesday
- Don't pay the CryptoLocker ransom
- Microsoft to block old ActiveX controls in security push
- Malware can live in USBs undetected
- Ignore the research: don't use weak passwords
- 20 years of PC Pro: our greatest review mistakes
- 20 years of PC Pro: our first A-List
- Wikipedia's "right to be forgotten" protest hits the wrong note
- 3D printing hits the high street for plastic selfies
- 20 years of PC Pro: What amazed us in our first issue
- How Google Glass ruined my lunch hour
- Smartphone battery packs: can a USB power pack beat the festival battery blues?
- Windows Easy Transfer – not so "easy" in Windows 8.1
- Formula 1: what a difference virtualisation makes
- Office of the future: comfy chairs and tablets everywhere
- Five worst SMB security threats... and how to solve them
- Heartbleed: what you need to know and do
- Measuring me: is your body the future of security?
- The top five consumer security threats for 2014
- Windows XP: Microsoft’s ticking time bomb
- The top five SMB security trends for 2014
- Securing the Internet of Things
- My PC is infected: what now?
- When coding becomes a crime
- Mobile web blocking: what it reveals about porn filtering plans
- How to write your company's IT security policy
- The key to choosing a secure password
- Please stop reposting fake Facebook messages
- Is Facebook safe for business?
- Don't rely on Chrome's password vault
- Facebook Graph Search: don't panic
- Gmail drafts and Pastebin: could they evade the email snoops?
- Applying for a job at GCHQ? Here's your plain-text password
- Google two-step verification: a must for business email
- Yes, I write down my passwords