AVG Internet Security 8 review
A fierce protector against web threats, but middling elsewhere.
Review Date: 13 Feb 2009
Reviewed By: Darien Graham-Smith
Price when reviewed: £51 (£59 inc VAT)
Value for Money
Ease of Use
Most of us have used AVG's free antivirus package, and the same engine underpins the company's full security suite. It also includes a firewall, email integration and antispam, plus a few extras such as rootkit detection and IM protection. Those are good things to have, but considering the basic malware component can be had for free it doesn't seem like great value.
Our malware detection tests only strengthened that impression. A score of just 80% left AVG near the bottom of the class, missing trojans, diallers, backdoors and more. When we probed the test PC with our network scanner, we found five potential vulnerabilities and six open TCP ports - more than any other package. We were less than impressed by the firewall too, which was confusing to configure and intrusive once we'd done so.
We were also turned off by the way the program's browser tool bar includes a Yahoo search box that can't be closed - and "page not found" errors are, by default, redirected to another page with a Yahoo search field. We might excuse that sort of thing in a free program, but not in a paid-for suite.
AVG does have one trump card: web-based detection. Clearly, the company's acquisition of Exploit Protection Labs and its LinkScanner package at the end of 2007 is paying off. By combining URL blacklists with real-time detection, AVG achieved a chart-topping 74% success rate with dodgy websites.
If your prime concern is web-based threats, AVG Internet Security is worth considering, but for all-round peace of mind we'd go with a more balanced package such as Avira.
Author: Darien Graham-Smith
You don't mention uninstalling AVG. On the free antivirus, it is extremely difficult to do. And the old versions stay as well. A company that has so little regard for their customers - who should be able to decide what software they want to use - should be avoided. I think that you should include ease of removal in all your software tests, and especially not include software that cannot be removed on your cover disk.
By RichardKeys on 3 Feb 2012
- Europol warns: public Wi-Fi isn't safe
- Hundreds of NHS sites vulnerable to hackers
- Second Bitcoin site closed after £345,000 hack
- Hackers take Meetup.com offline over $300 ransom
- Child-abuse image sellers demand Bitcoin-only payments
- London firm at centre of hack redirecting 300,000 routers
- Briton charged with hacking US Federal Reserve
- Apple quietly pulls support for OS X Snow Leopard
- RSA: NSA exploits position of trust with security firms
- Google buys UK startup to fight click fraud
- Move over Delia: IBM Watson is cooking tonight
- Eric Schmidt on the double-edged smartphone: friend and foe
- Getty joins the race to the bottom
- Hour of Code: five steps to learn how to code
- Sony Xperia Z2 Tablet review: first look
- Sony Xperia Z2 review: first look
- Samsung Galaxy Gear 2 review: first look
- Nokia XL review: first look
- Samsung Galaxy S5 review: first look
- Nokia X review: first look
- Measuring me: is your body the future of security?
- The top five consumer security threats for 2014
- Windows XP: Microsoft’s ticking time bomb
- The top five SMB security trends for 2014
- Securing the Internet of Things
- My PC is infected: what now?
- When coding becomes a crime
- Mobile web blocking: what it reveals about porn filtering plans
- The men trying to save us from the machines
- Windows 8 picture passwords: are they safe?
- The key to choosing a secure password
- Please stop reposting fake Facebook messages
- Is Facebook safe for business?
- Don't rely on Chrome's password vault
- Facebook Graph Search: don't panic
- Gmail drafts and Pastebin: could they evade the email snoops?
- Applying for a job at GCHQ? Here's your plain-text password
- Google two-step verification: a must for business email
- Yes, I write down my passwords
- How to deal with a ransomware attack