Trend Micro Internet Security Pro 2009 review
in Software
Verdict
Review Date: 1 Oct 2008
Reviewed By: Darien Graham-Smith
Price when reviewed: £47 (£54 inc VAT)
Features & Design
![]()
Value for Money
![]()
Ease of Use
![]()
Trend Micro has now completely ditched its PC-cillin brand, in favour of the more sober Internet Security label. The standard 2009 edition doesn't bring any major new features, but keeps parity with other packages - you get the expected malware detection and firewall, plus browser protection, anti-spam, anti-phishing and parental controls.
The Pro edition has a few unusual tricks too, with remote file-locking and smartphone antivirus.
Remote file-locking works with a simple encrypted folder, which can only be accessed with a password. If you report your computer stolen the folder is "locked" the next time the PC connects to the internet.
The smartphone package works with a wide range of Symbian phones, but as there's still little smartphone malware in the wild, it's impossible to say how effective this is.
More important than these extras is the package's impact on your system and its efficacy in detecting infections.
Unfortunately, in these crucial areas Trend Micro Internet Security lags behind. Installing it on a clean system that took 35 seconds to boot added 12 seconds - twice the impact of Norton Internet Security 2009 or Kaspersky Internet Security 2009.
Memory usage was comparatively high: one minute after booting, our bare system reported 475MB in use by Vista, which rose to 571MB with Trend Micro installed.
There were disappointments on the detection front, too. Its overall detection rate of 85% is respectable, but falls short of Norton's 92%.
It's also worth noting that, while Norton and Kaspersky dealt silently with every threat they found, Trend Micro stopped to ask us what to do ten times.
We'd like to be more positive about this package. But it's expensive if you don't have three computers to protect, and the brutal fact is that both Norton and Kaspersky offer better protection with lower system overheads.
Author: Darien Graham-Smith
From around the web
advertisement
- Symantec: we didn't "bribe" hackers, police did
- Tesco Bank customers targeted by fake Twitter account
- VeriSign slammed for security breach cover-up
- MPs attack Government scare tactics on cybercrime
- Symantec tells customers to disable pcAnywhere
- O2 apologises as it plugs phone number leak
- Hacking contest focuses on patching rather than speed
- McAfee warns of flaw in own security software
- Israel suffers multiple hack attacks
- F-Secure: Android adverts pose security risk
- Chrome's shine getting lost in translation
- BytePac: the cardboard hard disk enclosure
- How tech loosens our grip on reality
- Hokum watch: Safer Internet Day
- Why I'm deleting Adobe from my PC
- Prepare to be patronised: it's Safer Internet Day
- Dear Sony, Samsung and every other tech company in the world: stop trying to be Apple
- Will Apple's Final Cut Pro X update placate the pros?
- Smartr Contacts for iPhone review
- Switching to Office 365's Outlook Web App
- The ultimate guide to passwords
- How Apple lulls Mac owners into a false sense of security
- Top 10 stupid security stories of 2011
- Top ten password cracking techniques
- London riots: why pirates share the blame with parents
- Security school: academics take on cyberterrorists
- Inside job: anatomy of a bank card heist
- CSI smartphone
- Is this the golden age of hacking?
- Is online shopping security fundamentally broken?
- Paying for your crimes with Bitcoin
- Pavement hacking: What it is and how to avoid it
- Google's risky pre-loaded pages
- Mac under attack: how secure is Apple's OS?
- Has your browser been hijacked?
- Can you send a truly anonymous email?
- Is it safe to send bank details over email?
- Sainsbury's Bank bans password storage
- MobileMe triggers credit card blocks
- How to stay safe against session hijacking
advertisement






