Samsung Galaxy Note II review
The unusual form factor will put some off but, in every respect, this is a superb device
Review Date: 25 Oct 2012
Reviewed By: Mike Jennings
Price when reviewed: Free, on a £31.00 per month, 24 months contract.
Features & Design
Value for Money
Inside, there are more small differences: it employs the same quad-core Exynos 4412 processor as the S III, but runs at a slightly faster 1.6GHz rather than 1.4GHz, and the RAM has been doubled to 2GB. That results in a stellar set of benchmark results: the Note II scored 5,892 in Quadrant, ahead of the S III’s 5,413, and its SunSpider score of 1,042ms isn’t far behind the 932ms of the iPhone 5.
The Note II runs Jelly Bean and this makes for a wonderfully smooth experience when combined with Samsung’s TouchWiz UI tweaks. There’s no sign of slowdown during navigation, and high-end games run without a hitch: N.O.V.A. 3, Shadowgun and Dead Trigger all run flawlessly – an improvement over the S III, which struggles on occasion with the toughest titles.
Size aside, there are few differences between the Note II and S III’s screens. Both have an aspect ratio of 16:9, a resolution of 720 x 1,280, and the 239cd/m2 measured brightness and Super AMOLED panel’s perfect black levels make for a picture quality that’s bright, punchy and has plenty of depth. The larger diagonal does mean the pixels aren’t as dense, but you’ll be hard-pressed to see any of them unless you look very, very closely.
The Note has an 8mp camera, which is standard fare on phones these days, but Samsung has carried over many of the software enhancements we loved on the S III. The burst mode still takes 20 shots at just over 3fps, and the face detection and HDR modes work just as well. Technical users will be pleased by the glut of advanced options, from metering and white-balance options to manual ISO selection, and quality is still excellent.
One feature that is out of the ordinary is the 3,100mAh battery, which is larger than the power pack in most other smartphones, and in our tests it proved its worth. After 24 hours during which we carried out a series of controlled tests, the Note II had 78% of its battery left – one of the best results we’ve seen from any smartphone, and a big improvement on the 60% result of the original Note.
This powerful, long-lasting and intriguing device doesn’t come cheap. It’s free on a £31-a-month contract, and you’ll have to shell out £522. That’s much more than Samsung’s Galaxy S III – almost enough to buy a 16GB iPhone 5. And its undeniably odd form factor won’t appeal to all. However, the design of the S III scales up well, TouchWiz is still slick, and stylus-specific software is implemented well. The awkward size means the Galaxy S III is still our smartphone of choice, but if you’re after a device to bridge the gap between smartphones and tablets, this is as good as it gets.
Author: Mike Jennings
Best Smartphone yet
Had mine for five days and am blown away by it. Don't be put off by the large size, it fits snugly into my shirt pocket yet provides me with a very advanced tablet and a very advanced phone, the large size is a REAL advantage, now I don't know how I put up with my tiddly little HTC Desire for so long. The software provided is very well thought out (and lots of it) and perfectly integrated to the unit, Jelly Bean is great. Battery life is incredible. Why don't PC Pro give the sim free prices? mine was £520 Superb device and worth every penny.
By MikeHitchcock on 25 Oct 2012
A PDA by another name!
Ten years of technological advances to end up with a PDA + a mobile phone chip.
Thinks the marketing boys are laughing all the way to the bank.
By dholbon on 25 Oct 2012
Your PDA had a high resolution colour screen, could access the net at good speed, doubled as a sat nav, had an 8MP camera, HD video, could play FPS games and had voice recognition?
Wow.. That must have been some machine, back in the 90's.....
By TigerUnleashed on 25 Oct 2012
When Dell launched the Streak some 2 1/2 years ago, most reviews including PCpro said it was too big. What's changed?
By R4N6ER5RE4DY on 25 Oct 2012
What's changed is the brand. Any device with the name Samsung on it seems to get an automic thumbs up on PCPro.
By rascar_capac on 25 Oct 2012
The Streak was too early is the main thing. The OS and hardware needed for a decent user experience wasn’t available yet.
Most reviews (including PCPro) also said the original Note was too big, but it sold in droves because it worked well and people appreciated the extra choice in the market of having a big screen with a well integrated stylus.
Is an automic [sic] thumbs up better or worse than a nuclear thumbs up?
By TheHonestTruth on 25 Oct 2012
Tough to say, but neither is as good as an "automatic" thumbs up.....(clearly the "a" & the "t" decided to go for a walkabout in my first attempt)!
By rascar_capac on 25 Oct 2012
Some of guys are like radical christians!! such opinions even without using one! try it before u slag it!
By mcmpro1 on 25 Oct 2012
IMHO, the most advanced smartphone on the market
Having had all manner of BlackBerrys for seven years (none of which I got on that well with) then an iPhone 3GS (which I loved), the Note 2 that I've had for nearly two weeks blows them all out of the water. It is so much more advanced than the competition. It has a beautiful screen, a multitude of built in apps that will keep you amused for days and very responsive UI.
It is not 100% perfect of course, nothing is. TouchWiz, the Samsung layer over Jellybean, has crashed a few times but it recovers immediately after you click OK.
It doesn't feel too big in your pocket, unless you wear very tight trousers, as it is quite light weight and although it doesn't feel cheap, due to its size I don't know how robust it will be. I wouldn't want to drop it from more than a couple of feet above the ground. I have a cheap rubber bumper and screen protector on it until the MiTab or Poetic cases are out, then I will remove the screen protector - it's such a shame to have such a glorious screen only to have it dulled.
The camera is terrific and web browsing is a pleasure.
The size is ultimately, a matter of taste and probably not for everyone. But if you bought one you would want it for the larger screen otherwise you wouldn't get it. And it isn't *that* big really. When you've used it for a very short time, other phones seem far too small.
By Phewie on 25 Oct 2012
Works Exceptionally Well
Good review Mike. I would have given it 5 stars but depends what you need it for. Want a large screen and good inbuilt software? Then this is for you. I've had all the smart phones and recently held out to try this. On the demo in high st shop I wanted to buy it as soon as I started playing with it even though could have saved £50 buying it on line, it was that good. I was worried about the weight not the size. TBH I don't notice either. I carry it in my suit trousers no problem and dont have deep pockets. The form factor is perfect as I spend more time using the smart features than the phone. Comfort and handling can be achieved one handed. The pen handwriting CR is the best I have used on a mobile. The Note II is worth the price tag.
By thakaptain on 29 Oct 2012
I need something new on the AT&T 4GLTE network (contract expiring), so I'm looking at this. As a graphic designer who scribbles on the go, I'm putting the G Note 2 on my list, but it’s heavy. Too bad we can't order custom-made phones!
By TPuente on 25 Dec 2012
- Apple releases round 4 of iOS 8 and OS X Yosemite betas
- Cortana preview headed to Britain in two weeks
- Google unveils Chrome OS update "Athena"
- Piracy warning letters: four strikes and you're not out
- iPhone 6 sapphire display: is Apple cutting costs with composite materials?
- Google admits games with in-app purchases aren't free
- Is $300 the right price for an iWatch?
- Google Glass: everything you need to know
- Lenovo halts sales of compact Windows tablets in US
- Data watchdog investigates itself over data breach
- How Google Glass ruined my lunch hour
- Smartphone battery packs: can a USB power pack beat the festival battery blues?
- Windows Easy Transfer – not so "easy" in Windows 8.1
- Formula 1: what a difference virtualisation makes
- Office of the future: comfy chairs and tablets everywhere
- I went to Glastonbury and the only thing that got high was my smartphone
- Meet the robots helping teach children
- PaperLater: would you pay to print the internet?
- Amazon vs Kobo: how much to make the ebook switch?
- Phishing emails: how I nearly got caught out
- BlackBerry Passport release date, specs, features, and rumours: when is the new BlackBerry coming out?
- What's changing in the computing curriculum
- Teaching kids to code
- Best free translation apps for iOS, Android and Windows Phone
- Five worst SMB security threats... and how to solve them
- Apple iOS vs Android vs Windows 8 – what's the best compact tablet OS?
- The 11 best tablets of 2014: what’s the best tablet on the market?
- How to free up hard disk space
- Driverless cars: could your next car be driven by a robot?
- Microsoft Surface Pro 3 vs Surface Pro 2 comparison: is the new Surface Pro 3 worth buying?
- How to add in-app purchasing to an iPhone, Android or Windows app
- Remote-control ransomware: TeamViewer and software hardball
- Why laptops with serial ports matter to the Internet of Things
- Make your mobile battery last longer
- Small steps into handling Big Data
- Nexus 5: does it really run stock Android?
- How to get broadband to a garden office
- How to write your company's IT security policy
- Raspberry Pi and Wolfram: a must-have for every child
- Could you get by with Office Web Apps?