Google Nexus S review
in Smartphones
Verdict
A slick phone that's guaranteed to get the latest Android updates, but the price is on the high side
Review Date: 22 Dec 2010
Reviewed By: Jonathan Bray
Price when reviewed: Free, on a £30.00 per month, 24 months contract.
Features & Design
![]()
Value for Money
![]()
Performance
![]()
Ease of Use
![]()
For its third foray into the handset market, Google has finally moved away from HTC. Samsung is the search giant's new best buddy, and the result is the sensually curvaceous Google Nexus S. In fact, Google’s new baby is based on the Samsung’s Galaxy S, which is why the phone might have a familiar ring to it.
This is generally a good thing: the 4in 480 x 800 screen uses Samsung’s Super AMOLED technology, which means it’s eyeball-searing in its brightness and amazingly colourful, and the touchscreen itself is sensitive and accurate. With a 1GHz processor under the hood, too, the Nexus S feels very responsive.
We have the same reservations about the phone’s build quality, though – the rear panel is made of glossy, insubstantial-feeling plastic, and the whole thing seems just a little cheap. It isn’t a patch on the iPhone 4, nor any of HTC’s high-end Android handsets.
There are subtle differences, though, and the headline here is the Nexus S’s curved screen. Look at it from the side and you’ll see that it’s very slightly concave, the idea being that it’s more comfortable to hold to your face than a standard, flat-screened phone. Alas, it isn’t; we asked four PC Pro staff members to blind test the Nexus S against an HTC Desire HD, and they all said the latter was more comfortable on the ear.
The phone’s much-trumpeted near field communications (NFC) chip is another red herring. Swipe the phone over an NFC tag and the phone can read data from it or write data to it. When Google demonstrated it to us at a press event, a spokesman used it to read a web address from a label, automatically launching the Android browser in the process. That’s very impressive, but it’s a technology in its infancy, and we can’t see many Nexus S owners (in the UK at least) finding much use for it.
In a more baffling move, Google has chosen to ship the Nexus S without a micro SD card slot. Instead, there’s 16GB of integrated storage; we’d expect 32GB for the sort of money Google is asking for this phone. And in another backward step, it’s only capable of shooting 720 x 480 video, which is double odd since the Galaxy S shoots 720p. In fact the only clear advantages the Nexus S has over its cousin is an LED flash for its camera and, matching the iPhone 4, a three-axis gyroscope to go with its accelerometer.
Android 2.3
The biggest advantage to any Google phone is that owners are always ahead of the curve when it comes to operating system updates, and that hasn’t changed with Nexus S. It’s the only smartphone on the market right now to sport Android 2.3 (aka Gingerbread), and when the next version rolls along owners won’t have to wait on their network.
The changes in this version, however, aren't dramatic. Performance, for starters, is largely similar to other 2.2 phones. We timed the Nexus S at eight seconds to load the desktop BBC homepage and six seconds to complete the SunSpider JavaScript benchmark. The phone’s dedicated GPU should ensure that the most demanding games are delivered in a smooth and judder-free manner, though.
From around the web
Missed a trick
For me the main reason not to "upgrade" from my Nexus One to this is because of the non existent MicroSD. I've got a 32gb card in my current phone with over 24gb of music and video and pics and just couldn't bring myself to lose all of that to have a new phone with a pretty much the same spec.
A Shame really.
By GhillieDhu on 22 Dec 2010 ![]()
Why leave HTC??
I think moving to Samsung is a mistake on Google's part. HTC have superior phones but it seems Google wants to use the AMOLED screen that Samsung stopped supplying HTC. Agree with the 'cheapness' of the handset, HTC devices just feel more sturdy
By EddyOS_2K9 on 22 Dec 2010 ![]()
Happy Galaxy S owner
I'm running Android 2.2.1 on my Galaxy S and I love the phone. Some see "lightweight" as "cheap"; it was a positive selling point for me.
Current Samsung hardware is the best on the block (right now, anyway) and the screen is gorgeous - I can see why Google made the switch.
I, for one, am happy that Google is now using Samsung because I may get some benefit (like HTC Desire users getting early custom ROMs derived from Nexus One).
By scombellack on 22 Dec 2010 ![]()
It's not so much the weight but the 'feel' - it feels cheap (no offence!!). My girlfriend was considering the SGS and the screen is awesome, a lot clearer than the AMOLED on my Desire, but it just doesn't feel right. There's already Gingerbread ROMs built from the 2.3 source code for the Desire so everyone'll get 2.3 before Google/HTC/Sony/etc. release it
By EddyOS_2K9 on 23 Dec 2010 ![]()
Warranty
As long as the warranty is better. My son had a samsung that had a fatal error. He was told that he would have to pay something towards the repair
By delturner1 on 23 Dec 2010 ![]()
Picked the wrong model for Pure Android
As someone wanting to take my first leap into Android I want to love this phone and do for its purity of OS but unfortunately that isn't enough for this type of investment. It needs to be more of a leap forward hardware wise, faster processor, dual core, better battery life etc. Why didn't they just wait and make the Galaxy S2 (i9100 or i9200) the choice to have pure Android. With the rumours of the Galaxy S replacement due mid February, the Nexus S seems like a pointless release. Such a shame. Also these are still way too over priced when considering the tech involved. I would like to see the price come down to around the price of a netbook which I think would be more realistic.
By pcbuilder on 3 Jan 2011 ![]()
advertisement
- Google legal chief: privacy laws too hard on SMBs
- No free Visual Studio for Windows 8 desktop developers
- Facebook spends $1bn on Instagram... then launches its own Camera app
- Who sends Google the most takedown notices? Microsoft
- Microsoft wins text patent battle against Motorola
- Watchdog fines firm £50,000 over Android malware
- Intel to test smartcity future on London
- June decision on Microsoft's billion-dollar EU fine
- Yahoo browser launch marred by security flaw
- Autonomy management walk out over HP bureaucracy
- Laptop bag reviews: nine tested
- Sony VAIO T Series Ultrabook review: first look
- Revealed: the military standards and robots HP uses to test its laptops
- Windows 8: multi-monitors and double standards?
- Why is TalkTalk's year-old porn filter suddenly big news?
- Why are laptop screens so far behind mobiles?
- HP EliteBook Folio review: first look
- The shoebox-sized all-in-one printer
- Forget the Ultrabook: here comes the HP Sleekbook
- HP Spectre XT review: first look
- Can you buy technology with a clean conscience?
- The death of email
- How to use Windows 8 Metro
- 30 best features of Windows 8
- How to become a cyberspy
- Create your own smart home
- Install a custom ROM on your smartphone
- Can the Raspberry Pi save computing?
- Google: the pirates' best friend?
- Backups: ten tips to keep your data safe
- Why you have to be left in the dark on OS patches
- Is Microsoft mismanaging Windows on ARM?
- Dealing with spam surrogates
- Why 3G broadband can be better and cheaper than ADSL
- Is Twitter bad for business?
- Publishing your email address isn't a security disaster
- Why you'll need a fax machine to develop iOS apps
- Learning to adapt to the mobile web
- Why you shouldn't use WPS on your Wi-Fi network
- Disabled users suffer when software breaks the rules
advertisement







