Skip to navigation

Google Nexus S review

in Smartphones

Verdict

A slick phone that's guaranteed to get the latest Android updates, but the price is on the high side

Review Date: 22 Dec 2010

Reviewed By: Jonathan Bray

Price when reviewed: Free, on a £30.00 per month, 24 months contract.

Overall Rating
5 stars out of 6

Features & Design
5 stars out of 6

Value for Money
4 stars out of 6

Performance
5 stars out of 6

Ease of Use
5 stars out of 6

For its third foray into the handset market, Google has finally moved away from HTC. Samsung is the search giant's new best buddy, and the result is the sensually curvaceous Google Nexus S. In fact, Google’s new baby is based on the Samsung’s Galaxy S, which is why the phone might have a familiar ring to it.

This is generally a good thing: the 4in 480 x 800 screen uses Samsung’s Super AMOLED technology, which means it’s eyeball-searing in its brightness and amazingly colourful, and the touchscreen itself is sensitive and accurate. With a 1GHz processor under the hood, too, the Nexus S feels very responsive.

Google Nexus S

We have the same reservations about the phone’s build quality, though – the rear panel is made of glossy, insubstantial-feeling plastic, and the whole thing seems just a little cheap. It isn’t a patch on the iPhone 4, nor any of HTC’s high-end Android handsets.

There are subtle differences, though, and the headline here is the Nexus S’s curved screen. Look at it from the side and you’ll see that it’s very slightly concave, the idea being that it’s more comfortable to hold to your face than a standard, flat-screened phone. Alas, it isn’t; we asked four PC Pro staff members to blind test the Nexus S against an HTC Desire HD, and they all said the latter was more comfortable on the ear.

The phone’s much-trumpeted near field communications (NFC) chip is another red herring. Swipe the phone over an NFC tag and the phone can read data from it or write data to it. When Google demonstrated it to us at a press event, a spokesman used it to read a web address from a label, automatically launching the Android browser in the process. That’s very impressive, but it’s a technology in its infancy, and we can’t see many Nexus S owners (in the UK at least) finding much use for it.

Google Nexus S

In a more baffling move, Google has chosen to ship the Nexus S without a micro SD card slot. Instead, there’s 16GB of integrated storage; we’d expect 32GB for the sort of money Google is asking for this phone. And in another backward step, it’s only capable of shooting 720 x 480 video, which is double odd since the Galaxy S shoots 720p. In fact the only clear advantages the Nexus S has over its cousin is an LED flash for its camera and, matching the iPhone 4, a three-axis gyroscope to go with its accelerometer.

Android 2.3

The biggest advantage to any Google phone is that owners are always ahead of the curve when it comes to operating system updates, and that hasn’t changed with Nexus S. It’s the only smartphone on the market right now to sport Android 2.3 (aka Gingerbread), and when the next version rolls along owners won’t have to wait on their network.

The changes in this version, however, aren't dramatic. Performance, for starters, is largely similar to other 2.2 phones. We timed the Nexus S at eight seconds to load the desktop BBC homepage and six seconds to complete the SunSpider JavaScript benchmark. The phone’s dedicated GPU should ensure that the most demanding games are delivered in a smooth and judder-free manner, though.

1 2
Subscribe to PC Pro magazine. We'll give you 3 issues for £1 plus a free gift - click here

From around the web

User comments

Missed a trick

For me the main reason not to "upgrade" from my Nexus One to this is because of the non existent MicroSD. I've got a 32gb card in my current phone with over 24gb of music and video and pics and just couldn't bring myself to lose all of that to have a new phone with a pretty much the same spec.

A Shame really.

By GhillieDhu on 22 Dec 2010

Why leave HTC??

I think moving to Samsung is a mistake on Google's part. HTC have superior phones but it seems Google wants to use the AMOLED screen that Samsung stopped supplying HTC. Agree with the 'cheapness' of the handset, HTC devices just feel more sturdy

By EddyOS_2K9 on 22 Dec 2010

Happy Galaxy S owner

I'm running Android 2.2.1 on my Galaxy S and I love the phone. Some see "lightweight" as "cheap"; it was a positive selling point for me.
Current Samsung hardware is the best on the block (right now, anyway) and the screen is gorgeous - I can see why Google made the switch.
I, for one, am happy that Google is now using Samsung because I may get some benefit (like HTC Desire users getting early custom ROMs derived from Nexus One).

By scombellack on 22 Dec 2010

It's not so much the weight but the 'feel' - it feels cheap (no offence!!). My girlfriend was considering the SGS and the screen is awesome, a lot clearer than the AMOLED on my Desire, but it just doesn't feel right. There's already Gingerbread ROMs built from the 2.3 source code for the Desire so everyone'll get 2.3 before Google/HTC/Sony/etc. release it

By EddyOS_2K9 on 23 Dec 2010

Warranty

As long as the warranty is better. My son had a samsung that had a fatal error. He was told that he would have to pay something towards the repair

By delturner1 on 23 Dec 2010

Picked the wrong model for Pure Android

As someone wanting to take my first leap into Android I want to love this phone and do for its purity of OS but unfortunately that isn't enough for this type of investment. It needs to be more of a leap forward hardware wise, faster processor, dual core, better battery life etc. Why didn't they just wait and make the Galaxy S2 (i9100 or i9200) the choice to have pure Android. With the rumours of the Galaxy S replacement due mid February, the Nexus S seems like a pointless release. Such a shame. Also these are still way too over priced when considering the tech involved. I would like to see the price come down to around the price of a netbook which I think would be more realistic.

By pcbuilder on 3 Jan 2011

Leave a comment

You need to Login or Register to comment.

(optional)

Latest Category Reviews
Motorola Motoluxe review

Motorola Motoluxe

Category: Smartphones
Rating: 3 out of 6
Price: £190
Sony Xperia S review

Sony Xperia S

Category: Smartphones
Rating: 4 out of 6
Price: £379
HTC One X review

HTC One X

Category: Smartphones
Rating: 6 out of 6
Price: (£480 inc VAT); from free on £26/mth, 24mth contract
HTC Sensation XL review

HTC Sensation XL

Category: Smartphones
Rating: 5 out of 6
Price: £500
Samsung Galaxy Note review

Samsung Galaxy Note

Category: Smartphones
Rating: 5 out of 6
Price: £558
Compare reviews: Smartphones

advertisement

Most Commented Reviews
More From PC Pro
Latest News Stories Subscribe to our RSS Feeds
Latest Blog Posts Subscribe to our RSS Feeds
Latest Features
Latest Real World Computing

advertisement

Sponsored Links
 
 
SEARCH
SIGN UP

Your email:

Your password:

remember me

advertisement


Hitwise Top 10 Website 2010
 
 

PCPro-Computing in the Real World Printed from www.pcpro.co.uk

Register to receive our regular email newsletter at http://www.pcpro.co.uk/registration.

The newsletter contains links to our latest PC news, product reviews, features and how-to guides, plus special offers and competitions.