T-Mobile Pulse review
in Smartphones
Verdict
Easy to use and easy on the hand – a good value smartphone with superb performance
Review Date: 30 Dec 2009
Reviewed By: Jonathan Bray
Price when reviewed: Free
Buy it now for: £56
(see more store prices)
Features & Design
![]()
Value for Money
![]()
Ease of Use
![]()
![]()
Huawei is best known for producing mobile broadband dongles for UK mobile phone networks, but it also makes mobile phones – and the T-Mobile Pulse is its flagship model.
It's available exclusively in the UK on T-Mobile, but surprisingly that doesn't mean high prices as it can do with exclusive handsets. On the contrary, the Pulse is a great value phone, costing a mere £405 over 18 months on the best deal we could find, which is reasonable when compared to the iPhone 3GS.
And it's not far behind the iPhone in terms of all-round performance either. It's an Android phone, which means general operation - specifically web browsing - is extremely straightforward. Apps are supplied via the rapidly-improving Android Market. And text entry is good too, aided by the addition of a custom keyboard. Cootek's Touchpal is one of the best we've used on any touchscreen phone.
T-Mobile has gone to the trouble of customising the front end too, adding a handy quick contacts screen, and doubling the standard three-screen Android desktop to a vast six, arranged in two vertically-stacked rows of three.
Possibly this phone's greatest asset, however, is its speed. Loading the BBC homepage over Wi-Fi took an average of 11 seconds – among phones we've tested before only the Palm Pre and iPhone 3GS are quicker – and general responsiveness was superb across the board. Even battery life impressed with 70% capacity (rounded to the nearest 10%) remaining after 24 hours of testing, outstripping the iPhone 3GS by quite some distance.
And when it comes to features, there's not much missing. The screen is the same size and resolution as the iPhone's – 3.5in and 320 x 480 – plus you get HSDPA, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, GPS, an electronic compass and an accelerometer.
If there is a weakness, it's that the chassis feels plasticky when compared with some of the more luxurious handsets here. We didn't much like the 3.2-megapixel camera, which produced muddy, lo-fi results and has no flash. There's also no multitouch, and the presence of a 2.5mm headphone socket instead of a more standard 3.5mm one is plain baffling in a consumer phone such as this.
But, all told, there are more positives here than there are negatives. The Pulse is blessed with impressive battery life, great performance and ease of use, plus good value tariffs. If you don't like the idea of spending a fortune on an iPhone, it's a very good alternative.
Author: Jonathan Bray
Best Prices
Price comparison powered by 
| Prices, delivery and availability at 2 retailers | Go | |
|
£56 | Go |
|
£64 | Go |
From around the web
Why do all the shopping links lead me to prices for Samsung TVs, instead of the T-Mobile Pulse?
By pbryanw on 30 Dec 2009 ![]()
I have got one of these, and I agree with most of the positive points, except that the battery life is not as good as you say it is, and the Touchpal keyboard is nice,but the spacebar is too small, so I frequently hit the letter B instead of space.
Also, you decline to mention that this handset is available on pay as you go for £137! I love my pulse though :)
By TobsterA on 30 Dec 2009 ![]()
I bought one of these a few weeks ago on PAYG when t-mobile were having a 33% off all PAYG handsets, so picked it up for £101 including a £10 topup. For that price there's nothing to beat it. Got it unlocked for about £12 and have it running on my O2 contract, I'd have kept it on the t-mobile PAYG SIM if they had better coverage where I live since the SIM gives unlimited Texts and 40mb data/day for a month if you have topped up by £10 the month before.
By Shuflie on 31 Dec 2009 ![]()
Just read the review properly, there are no light or proximity sensors, but the rest of it seems pretty much accurate.
By Shuflie on 31 Dec 2009 ![]()
Spam
Guys at PC Pro I recommend you to check who is having a free advertising ride on your websites: Samsung TVs ??? Pretty poor if you ask me
By raritzu on 2 Jan 2010 ![]()
advertisement
- LinkedIn revenue doubles as membership soars
- Kodak kills off cameras
- UK broadband project spending £1m on legal fees
- Microsoft: Windows on ARM won't be sold separately
- Intel pays five hours of profits to settle antitrust case
- Windows 8 on ARM to run desktop apps... but only Office
- Ofcom dithers over plans to tackle broadband slamming
- Data boost bolsters Vodafone revenue
- Google working on cloud storage system
- Lenovo's profit leaps 54% on market gains
- Chrome's shine getting lost in translation
- BytePac: the cardboard hard disk enclosure
- How tech loosens our grip on reality
- Hokum watch: Safer Internet Day
- Why I'm deleting Adobe from my PC
- Prepare to be patronised: it's Safer Internet Day
- Dear Sony, Samsung and every other tech company in the world: stop trying to be Apple
- Will Apple's Final Cut Pro X update placate the pros?
- Smartr Contacts for iPhone review
- Switching to Office 365's Outlook Web App
- The ultimate guide to passwords
- How Apple lulls Mac owners into a false sense of security
- Privacy - outdated luxury or public necessity?
- Building the bionic man
- The making of open-source software
- Top 10 stupid security stories of 2011
- 10 techs to watch in 2012
- PC Pro's favourite tech products of 2011
- 10 most read articles on PC Pro in 2011
- 50 ways to make your PC better
- Why virtualisation hasn't slowed the growth of data
- How to make Google AdWords work for your business
- The curse of sloppily written software
- Paying for your crimes with Bitcoin
- Behind the scenes: tech support for Formula 1
- The security risk of fat fingers
- Why Windows Phone 7 isn't quite ready for business
- When will Microsoft stop fiddling with Windows 8?
- Flash down the pan?
- Metro Style apps vs desktop applications
advertisement






