Palm Pre review
in Smartphones
Verdict
It's good enough to ensure a devoted following, but this much-hyped phone isn't without its weaknesses
Review Date: 7 Oct 2009
Reviewed By: Jonathan Bray
Price when reviewed: £97, on a £29.00 per month, 18 months contract.
Features & Design
![]()
Value for Money
![]()
Ease of Use
![]()
It looked as if Palm had struck smartphone gold when it showcased the Palm Pre for the first time at CES in January. Here was a phone, complete with what appeared to be an iPhone-rivalling OS, but with proper, grown-up multitasking and no iTunes lock-in.
The anticipation was at fever pitch. But months went by and all was quiet - then a launch in the US, and still nothing for Europe. Until suddenly, out of the blue, Palm announced it was launching with O2 on October 16. Joy. Elation. Excitement, once again.
But with the Pre in our hands are we still as keen? The short answer is no. WebOS may look slick in the demos, but in use we encountered frequent stuttering and a lot of pauses. When it works, it works very well, but when it doesn't it's teeth-gnashingly annoying. And note these aren't early glitches, soon to be ironed out; the Pre has been out for some time in the US and any problems ought to have been sorted months ago.
It's a shame, because the interface itself has much to recommend it. The multitasking OS means you can play music and browse the internet at the same time, for example, or flick back and forth between various applications, cutting and pasting text as you go.
Read PC Pro's smartphone reviews
Looking for a new phone? Compare phones side by side with PC Pro's unique reviews filter tool.It's a clever system, but not without its annoyances. It can be a little confusing, for instance, that emails open in a separate card, while the switch from the account view to message browsing keeps you in the same place. Palm's approach also ensures that the launching of applications takes a back seat. You can launch frequently used apps from a five-icon shortcut bar (which runs along the bottom of the screen in the task card view), but for everything else, you have to tap another button to fire up the application launch screen.
Another hindrance is the context-sensitive dropdown menu and status area, which are a constant presence at the top of the screen. This is simply too small to be able to press with consistent accuracy.
From around the web
"But with an identical pricing structure to the iPhone 3GS, it needs to be better than its opponent"
Er why? Surely, at the same price, it only has to be as good?
If it was more expensive it would have to be better.
By Grunthos on 7 Oct 2009 ![]()
@Jonathan Bray: Nice article, incredible that the competition is still finding it hard to complete a package to rival the iPhone. Have to say I'm not even slightly interested in it combining all my calanders in one place, surely anyone who needs to do that can just have them all on their phone in the first place. 8gb is small, and no video capture? :
Piece of mind for me as a 3GS owner ;)
By deejerox on 7 Oct 2009 ![]()
blackberry multi-task
er, the blackberry has application switching functionality and you can change one of the buttons to show the open applications.
you can easily play music, surf the web and check your email by cycling through the applications. i know i do.
By smokinscots on 7 Oct 2009 ![]()
If I remember rightly Apple didn't get it right first time round either. What was it - no 3G - I can't remember. The Apple device is a whizz today no doubt - but don't knock the pre just yet. The iPhone has had two years to get to where it is today. Version 2 of the Palm pre will knock the socks clear off any later version of the iPhone - lets hope :)
By nicomo on 7 Oct 2009 ![]()
Shame
I backed Palm for years as the best bet for smartphones... sadly they never quite cracked the usability issue
By Chronometric on 19 Oct 2010 ![]()
advertisement
- How to install Internet Explorer 9
- Maintaining and supporting IE9
- Plan your deployment
- Creating a custom browser package
- Search in corporate environments
- VeriSign slammed for security breach cover-up
- SAP willing to share HANA with Oracle
- Why using a tablet could harm your health
- New RIM boss: no need for drastic change
- RIM founders fall on their swords
- Slow economy helps boost Red Hat revenue by 23%
- Google+ pages get multiple admins
- One in five companies lack card industry compliance
- Oil industry warns hacking attacks could kill
- British workers fear email monitoring
- Why I'm deleting Adobe from my PC
- Prepare to be patronised: it's Safer Internet Day
- Dear Sony, Samsung and every other tech company in the world: stop trying to be Apple
- Will Apple's Final Cut Pro X update placate the pros?
- Smartr Contacts for iPhone review
- Switching to Office 365's Outlook Web App
- Amazon Kindle Fire review: first look
- Lytro light-field camera: first look
- CES: Why booth babes are bad marketing
- Ice Cream Sandwich on the Transformer Prime review: first look
- Why everyone hates the IT department
- Is online shopping security fundamentally broken?
- New cookie laws: why website owners should be worried
- Are work web blockers a waste of time?
- 11 golden rules for virtualisation
- When is it right to go public with security flaws?
- Is your business ready for VoIP?
- Remote working for small businesses
- The Complete Guide to Office 2010
- The complete guide to Office 2010: Web Apps
- How to make Google AdWords work for your business
- The curse of sloppily written software
- Paying for your crimes with Bitcoin
- Behind the scenes: tech support for Formula 1
- The security risk of fat fingers
- Why Windows Phone 7 isn't quite ready for business
- When will Microsoft stop fiddling with Windows 8?
- Flash down the pan?
- Metro Style apps vs desktop applications
- Coping with Facebook changes
advertisement





