HTC Touch2 review
in Smartphones
Verdict
A well-made and usable Windows smartphone - just don't expect the new Windows Mobile to make a massive difference
Review Date: 6 Oct 2009
Reviewed By: Jonathan Bray
Price when reviewed: £260 (£299 inc VAT)
Buy it now for: £218
(see more store prices)
Features & Design
![]()
Value for Money
![]()
Ease of Use
![]()
HTC always seems to be on the bleeding edge when it comes to new mobile OS releases. It was the first out with an Android handset this time last year, and it's now the first to us with Windows Mobile 6.5 - henceforth to be known as Windows Phone.
We've given Microsoft Windows Phone an in-depth review elsewhere, but suffice it to say we weren't impressed. Fortunately, the HTC Touch2 features a new and improved version of HTC's own Windows Mobile front-end. And with HTC TouchFLO 3D turned on you get the best of both worlds.
You still get the new Windows Mobile lock screen with its useful status alerts, and slide-to-unlock onscreen control, plus access to the new Windows Mobile start menu. But you also get TouchFLO's deeper and far more attractive interface enhancements. And HTC has considerably cleaned up the previously fussy 3D elements of the UI, combining the weather and home screen cleverly in the process.
The phone itself is unassuming - more compact and friendly-feeling than the angular Hero, and less austere than the sharply tailored Touch Diamond2. It's both nice to handle and light in the pocket, boasts decent battery life - our tests had it lasting into the fifth day under a light, mixed-use scenario - and the touchscreen works well. As with other HTC Windows Mobile phones you also get a Zoom bar, which sits below the screen, allowing you to quickly zoom in and out of web pages, images and documents.
But this phone isn't what you'd call cutting edge. The core hardware platform remains the same as every HTC phone over the past year and a half (a 528 MHz Qualcomm MSM7225 processor, coupled with 512MB ROM and 256MB RAM), and it's surprisingly bereft of modern smartphone toys.
The screen, for example, is a lowly 240 x 320, which makes using the phone fiddly at times. There's also no accelerometer, so if you want to get another angle on your web pages or photos, you have to change orientation manually. And the camera is only 3.2-megapixels, boasting neither flash nor autofocus. On the plus side you do get GPS for navigation, and a standard 3.5mm headphone socket is a welcome sight.
As a phone, the Touch2 is rather likeable, despite its lack of glitzy gadgets. It's light, compact, well-made and boasts good battery life. It can't compete with the HTC Hero on ease of use or browsing the web, but if you have to use a Windows Mobile handset, it isn't a bad option.
Author: Jonathan Bray
Best Prices
Price comparison powered by 
| Prices, delivery and availability at 1 retailer | Go | |
|
£218 | Go |
From around the web
Details seem incorrect
I'm not sure which release of this phone you are looking at. I am in the states, with an HTC Touch Pro2 from Verizon. My phone has a HUGE 3.6" 480x800 hires screen. The camera DOES has autofocus, plus man extra abilities. It HAS an accelerometer that works great and comes with a game called Teeter that showcases the feature. The orientation switches quickly and automatically.
This phone is really great.
By jdizzy on 6 Oct 2009 ![]()
Correct Details
The details are correct.
This phone is the Touch2 (QVGA Res) not the Touch Pro2 (WVGA Res).
By remarks on 7 Oct 2009 ![]()
Strange Review
I don't get the bit that says "this phone isn't what you'd call cutting edge. The core hardware platform remains the same as every HTC phone over the past year and a half".
This is a budget phone. The phones you refer to were top-of-the-range models costing nearly twice as much. Isn't that what happens in the IT industry. High-end tech trickles down to the low end.
You would never complain that a budget, £300 PC had the same spec as a top-end model from just 12-18 months ago. It would be considered a good thing.
I can accept the complaint that HTC have been slow to update the hardware on their top-end phones (although the HD2 with 1GHz snapdragon has now been officially announced) but that is a criticism for a different product.
It just seems very strange to mark down a budget phone for having an identical spec to most top-end phones. You guys are tough!
By Bassey1976 on 7 Oct 2009 ![]()
Strange Review
I don't get the bit that says "this phone isn't what you'd call cutting edge. The core hardware platform remains the same as every HTC phone over the past year and a half".
This is a budget phone. The phones you refer to were top-of-the-range models costing nearly twice as much. Isn't that what happens in the IT industry. High-end tech trickles down to the low end.
You would never complain that a budget, £300 PC had the same spec as a top-end model from just 12-18 months ago. It would be considered a good thing.
I can accept the complaint that HTC have been slow to update the hardware on their top-end phones (although the HD2 with 1GHz snapdragon has now been officially announced) but that is a criticism for a different product.
It just seems very strange to mark down a budget phone for having an identical spec to most top-end phones. You guys are tough!
By Bassey1976 on 7 Oct 2009 ![]()
Strange Review
I don't get the bit that says "this phone isn't what you'd call cutting edge. The core hardware platform remains the same as every HTC phone over the past year and a half".
This is a budget phone. The phones you refer to were top-of-the-range models costing nearly twice as much. Isn't that what happens in the IT industry. High-end tech trickles down to the low end.
You would never complain that a budget, £300 PC had the same spec as a top-end model from just 12-18 months ago. It would be considered a good thing.
I can accept the complaint that HTC have been slow to update the hardware on their top-end phones (although the HD2 with 1GHz snapdragon has now been officially announced) but that is a criticism for a different product.
It just seems very strange to mark down a budget phone for having an identical spec to most top-end phones. You guys are tough!
By Bassey1976 on 7 Oct 2009 ![]()
Does anyone know
can anyone tell me what the memory is like for music and other applications as I am looking at buying the phone and was wondering if I require a micro sd card
By DudeBoy on 8 Feb 2010 ![]()
Touch 2 A Great Phone
I did quite a bit of research and narrowed it down to a Touch 2 or a Hero. I could afford both and the Hero cost £110 more.
I made my decision on size, features, reviews and costs.
The touch 2 is a great phone that fits well in your pocket, you don,t feel like you have a dinner plate in your hands and after 5 weeks of hard use I have NOT froze it up once.
I work in the building industry so it had to be rugged, with the help of a HTC Pouch it is still in excellent condition.
More then enough features. I am not one for brainless apps so all in all a Perfect phone.
If I was a office dweller I may have choose the Hero, but still a bit big for my liking!
Most reviews are a bot down on this phone read the specs on the HTC site and don't be fooled my people who have a preference to the phone that is in their pocket!
I pay £15 for 11 months (£165) with BT To Go: includes 150 mins 100 Text 510mb Data.
Main use Wifi, Data conection, followed by phone then text.
Touch 2 A Great Phone!
By iowadie on 30 Mar 2010 ![]()
advertisement
- How to install Internet Explorer 9
- Maintaining and supporting IE9
- Plan your deployment
- Creating a custom browser package
- Search in corporate environments
- VeriSign slammed for security breach cover-up
- SAP willing to share HANA with Oracle
- Why using a tablet could harm your health
- New RIM boss: no need for drastic change
- RIM founders fall on their swords
- Slow economy helps boost Red Hat revenue by 23%
- Google+ pages get multiple admins
- One in five companies lack card industry compliance
- Oil industry warns hacking attacks could kill
- British workers fear email monitoring
- Dear Sony, Samsung and every other tech company in the world: stop trying to be Apple
- Will Apple's Final Cut Pro X update placate the pros?
- Smartr Contacts for iPhone review
- Switching to Office 365's Outlook Web App
- Amazon Kindle Fire review: first look
- Lytro light-field camera: first look
- CES: Why booth babes are bad marketing
- Ice Cream Sandwich on the Transformer Prime review: first look
- Samsung Galaxy Tab 7.7: first-look review of the best tablet at CES
- 3D printing: undeniably cool, but lacks a killer app
- Why everyone hates the IT department
- Is online shopping security fundamentally broken?
- New cookie laws: why website owners should be worried
- Are work web blockers a waste of time?
- 11 golden rules for virtualisation
- When is it right to go public with security flaws?
- Is your business ready for VoIP?
- Remote working for small businesses
- The Complete Guide to Office 2010
- The complete guide to Office 2010: Web Apps
- The curse of sloppily written software
- Paying for your crimes with Bitcoin
- Behind the scenes: tech support for Formula 1
- The security risk of fat fingers
- Why Windows Phone 7 isn't quite ready for business
- When will Microsoft stop fiddling with Windows 8?
- Flash down the pan?
- Metro Style apps vs desktop applications
- Coping with Facebook changes
- The power of PPC
advertisement





