Skip to navigation

HP ProLiant DL585 G7 review

in Servers

Verdict

More costly than Dell's R815, but the DL585 G7 can't be beaten on storage features and remote management

Review Date: 20 Dec 2010

Reviewed By: Dave Mitchell

Price when reviewed: £10,008 (£11,759 inc VAT)

Overall Rating
5 stars out of 6

Features & Design
5 stars out of 6

Value for Money
4 stars out of 6

Performance
5 stars out of 6


The review system included 1GB of HP's flash-backed write cache and the battery backup pack. The P410i supports mirrors, stripes and RAID5 as standard, and adding an advanced licence pack brings RAID6 into the storage equation.

The SPI board presents a quartet of Gigabit ports at the rear and an expansion slot for HP's dual-port 10-Gigabit SFP module. It also features HP's new iLO3 remote management controller, providing a dedicated Fast Ethernet port for management access and pairs of USB and PS/2 ports too.

Virtualisation is well catered for, with the system board offering two internal USB ports and an embedded SD memory card slot on the SPI board. You can add a SATA DVD drive at the front; the system board has the interface cable ready and waiting for it.

The DL585 G7 excels when it comes to expansion: there are five available PCI Express slots, all supporting full-height, full-length cards. There's room to add an extra I/O expansion board and HP offers options with six more PCI Express slots or a mixture of these and PCI Extended.

HP ProLiant DL585 G7

For power redundancy, the DL585 G7 includes four 1,200W hot-plug modules: it did well in our power tests, with its four 2.1GHz 6172 Opterons pulling 356W in idle and peaking at 710W with SiSoft Sandra. This compares favourably with Dell's R815, which drew 335W in idle and 618W under load. This had four 2.2GHz AMD 6174 Opterons, 64GB of memory and only two 1,023W power supplies.

Gateway's GR585 F1 drew 159W in idle and 328W under load, but it's difficult to compare as our review system had only one 1,400W supply plus two processors. Doubling the numbers does show the DL585's monster hardware package isn't overly greedy, though.

The choices for 4P servers using AMD's Opteron 6100 processors seem clear cut. If price is top priority then Gateway's GR585 F1 offers the best value package. In Dell's PowerEdge R815 you have high rack-cabinet processing density, good support for virtualisation and decent remote management features. Although the DL585 G7 is the most expensive, it suits businesses looking for a server consolidation and virtualisation platform with massive expansion potential, the best remote management tools and good storage options.

Author: Dave Mitchell

1 2
Subscribe to PC Pro magazine. We'll give you 3 issues for £1 plus a free gift - click here

From around the web

User comments

48cores

Dear Dave,
I am reading your Enterprise reviews with great respect for many years already. (ItPro & PcPro). I am sure that you are the best reviewer that Dennis Publishing has (ever had?). But sometimes - maybe that's because I am getting old myself - I am getting impression that your standard physical criteria for a server haven't changed to properly reflect virtualization issues or actual power (as in performance) of the server itself.

Virtualization Issues:
I agree that if the server in question is not used for virtualization, then upgradeability and versatility is the most important criterion. But in the world of virtualization I am not so sure whether the maximum number of hard disks plays any role of importance as customers would most likely consider the purchase a storage array. Especially when the server in question sports as many as 48cores.
With this remark I maneuvered myself into a position where I have no other choice but to suggest to have separate criteria for virtualized and not virtualized servers.

Power/Performance Issues:
The target group of 48cores servers are not SME’s looking for an SBS rollout, but larger enterprises purchasing not one, not two, but full racks of 48core servers. For this target group, the difference between 2U and 4U is far more significant than the technical statistic whether given server can handle 6 or 8 disks.
From this point of view, for larger enterprises 2U servers would be superior to 4U servers.

Cheers!

By stasi47 on 20 Dec 2010

Leave a comment

You need to Login or Register to comment.

(optional)

Latest Category Reviews
Dell PowerEdge R720 review

Dell PowerEdge R720

Category: Servers
Rating: 6 out of 6
Price: £8,956
Broadberry CyberServe XE5-R1304 review

Broadberry CyberServe XE5-R1304

Category: Servers
Rating: 5 out of 6
Price: £3,792
Fujitsu Primergy RX300 S7 review

Fujitsu Primergy RX300 S7

Category: Servers
Rating: 4 out of 6
Price: £7,126
Dell PowerEdge R815 review

Dell PowerEdge R815

Category: Servers
Rating: 5 out of 6
Price: £10,537
Boston Value Series 380 G8 review

Boston Value Series 380 G8

Category: Servers
Rating: 5 out of 6
Price: £4,979
Compare reviews: Servers

advertisement

More From PC Pro
Latest News Stories Subscribe to our RSS Feeds
Latest Blog Posts Subscribe to our RSS Feeds
Latest Features
Latest Real World Computing

advertisement

Sponsored Links
 
 
SEARCH
SIGN UP

Your email:

Your password:

remember me

advertisement


Hitwise Top 10 Website 2010
 
 

PCPro-Computing in the Real World Printed from www.pcpro.co.uk

Register to receive our regular email newsletter at http://www.pcpro.co.uk/registration.

The newsletter contains links to our latest PC news, product reviews, features and how-to guides, plus special offers and competitions.