HP ProLiant DL585 G7 review
in Servers
Verdict
More costly than Dell's R815, but the DL585 G7 can't be beaten on storage features and remote management
Review Date: 20 Dec 2010
Reviewed By: Dave Mitchell
Price when reviewed: £10,008 (£11,759 inc VAT)
Features & Design
![]()
Value for Money
![]()
Performance
![]()
From around the web
48cores
Dear Dave,
I am reading your Enterprise reviews with great respect for many years already. (ItPro & PcPro). I am sure that you are the best reviewer that Dennis Publishing has (ever had?). But sometimes - maybe that's because I am getting old myself - I am getting impression that your standard physical criteria for a server haven't changed to properly reflect virtualization issues or actual power (as in performance) of the server itself.
Virtualization Issues:
I agree that if the server in question is not used for virtualization, then upgradeability and versatility is the most important criterion. But in the world of virtualization I am not so sure whether the maximum number of hard disks plays any role of importance as customers would most likely consider the purchase a storage array. Especially when the server in question sports as many as 48cores.
With this remark I maneuvered myself into a position where I have no other choice but to suggest to have separate criteria for virtualized and not virtualized servers.
Power/Performance Issues:
The target group of 48cores servers are not SME’s looking for an SBS rollout, but larger enterprises purchasing not one, not two, but full racks of 48core servers. For this target group, the difference between 2U and 4U is far more significant than the technical statistic whether given server can handle 6 or 8 disks.
From this point of view, for larger enterprises 2U servers would be superior to 4U servers.
Cheers!
By stasi47 on 20 Dec 2010 ![]()
advertisement
- Autonomy's Lynch joins 27,000 on way out of HP
- ICO: no fines for breaking cookie rules
- HP set to slash up to 30,000 jobs
- Government sites to miss cookie deadline
- Microsoft tweaks multi-monitor support in Windows 8
- Apple patches Leopard, despite ending support last year
- Defra opens rural broadband funding applications
- BT's broadband sales surpass calls revenue
- Apple patches multiple security issues
- FBI warns travellers to beware attacks via hotel Wi-Fi
- Laptop bag reviews: nine tested
- Sony VAIO T Series Ultrabook review: first look
- Revealed: the military standards and robots HP uses to test its laptops
- Windows 8: multi-monitors and double standards?
- Why is TalkTalk's year-old porn filter suddenly big news?
- Why are laptop screens so far behind mobiles?
- HP EliteBook Folio review: first look
- The shoebox-sized all-in-one printer
- Forget the Ultrabook: here comes the HP Sleekbook
- HP Spectre XT review: first look
- The death of email
- Backups: ten tips to keep your data safe
- Tablets for work: the best apps, kit and advice
- Why everyone hates the IT department
- Is online shopping security fundamentally broken?
- New cookie laws: why website owners should be worried
- Are work web blockers a waste of time?
- 11 golden rules for virtualisation
- When is it right to go public with security flaws?
- Is your business ready for VoIP?
- Why you have to be left in the dark on OS patches
- Is Microsoft mismanaging Windows on ARM?
- Dealing with spam surrogates
- Why 3G broadband can be better and cheaper than ADSL
- Is Twitter bad for business?
- Publishing your email address isn't a security disaster
- Why you'll need a fax machine to develop iOS apps
- Learning to adapt to the mobile web
- Why you shouldn't use WPS on your Wi-Fi network
- Disabled users suffer when software breaks the rules
advertisement






