Fujitsu Primergy RX300 S6 review
in Servers
Verdict
Fujitsu's new 2U rack server is good value, well designed and easily managed. It offers good expansion too
Review Date: 3 Aug 2010
Reviewed By: Dave Mitchell
Price when reviewed: £4,273 (£5,021 inc VAT)
Features & Design
![]()
Value for Money
![]()
Performance
![]()
![]()
It's taken a while for the blue-chip server vendors to catch up with Intel's launch of its Xeon 5600 processors. Fujitsu is once again the first of the big four to deliver a product to our lab, and in this exclusive review we delve deeper into its new Primergy RX300 S6, which sports Intel's new six-core Xeon.
The Xeon 5600 series offers a choice of 12 processors ranging from the low-power, four-core 1.86GHz L5609 right up to the six-core 3.33GHz X5680. The review sample was supplied with a pair of 2.66GHz six-core X5650 Xeons, which sit in the middle of this family.
The RX300 S6 is aimed at a wide range of applications, with Fujitsu placing a priority on virtualisation duties. Memory is king in this space, and the server offers a total of 18 DIMM sockets supporting up to 192GB of ECC registered memory.
Memory redundancy looks good, as you can enable hot-sparing and mirroring, with the former requiring three identical DIMMs per channel. Memory mirroring requires two identical DIMMs per channel, splits available system memory in two, and duplicates data across each half.
Fujitsu has included an internal USB port for booting to an embedded hypervisor, but it can't match Dell in this area. The PowerEdge R710 supports both USB and SD card media, and for the latter Dell has enhanced its servers to include a pair of internal slots providing boot media redundancy.
The RX300's tool-free design is remarkably tidy, with easy access to major components. All removable parts have green touch-points, showing which items can be extracted by hand.
Cooling is handled by a row of five hot-swap fans fitted directly behind the processors. Fujitsu has reduced the chances of component failure or breakage: rather than use plugs, each fan power connector mates with surface-mounted contact points. The entire fan box can also be removed by pressing the touch-points on each side. The box actually has room for five more fans, but Fujitsu advised us these aren't required for this server.
From around the web
advertisement
- VeriSign slammed for security breach cover-up
- SAP willing to share HANA with Oracle
- Why using a tablet could harm your health
- New RIM boss: no need for drastic change
- RIM founders fall on their swords
- Slow economy helps boost Red Hat revenue by 23%
- Google+ pages get multiple admins
- One in five companies lack card industry compliance
- Oil industry warns hacking attacks could kill
- British workers fear email monitoring
- Chrome's shine getting lost in translation
- BytePac: the cardboard hard disk enclosure
- How tech loosens our grip on reality
- Hokum watch: Safer Internet Day
- Why I'm deleting Adobe from my PC
- Prepare to be patronised: it's Safer Internet Day
- Dear Sony, Samsung and every other tech company in the world: stop trying to be Apple
- Will Apple's Final Cut Pro X update placate the pros?
- Smartr Contacts for iPhone review
- Switching to Office 365's Outlook Web App
- Why everyone hates the IT department
- Is online shopping security fundamentally broken?
- New cookie laws: why website owners should be worried
- Are work web blockers a waste of time?
- 11 golden rules for virtualisation
- When is it right to go public with security flaws?
- Is your business ready for VoIP?
- Remote working for small businesses
- The Complete Guide to Office 2010
- The complete guide to Office 2010: Web Apps
- Why virtualisation hasn't slowed the growth of data
- How to make Google AdWords work for your business
- The curse of sloppily written software
- Paying for your crimes with Bitcoin
- Behind the scenes: tech support for Formula 1
- The security risk of fat fingers
- Why Windows Phone 7 isn't quite ready for business
- When will Microsoft stop fiddling with Windows 8?
- Flash down the pan?
- Metro Style apps vs desktop applications
advertisement






