Sun Microsystems Sun Fire X2270 review
in Servers
Verdict
The X2270 delivers a good rack-based specification centred round Intel's new 5500 processors but power consumption for a 1U HPC node is high.
Review Date: 27 May 2009
Reviewed By: Dave Mitchell
Price when reviewed: £2,555 (£2,938 inc VAT)
Features & Design
![]()
Value for Money
![]()
Performance
![]()
The secure web interface is easy to use and opens with a status report on all critical components and their condition. You don't get any nice graphs but a table is provided showing the values for all voltages, temperatures and fan speeds. Predefined thresholds are applied to each one and if breached you can have the ILOM issue an email alert or SNMP trap.
The ILOM puts Sun on a par with HP as most of its ProLiant servers come with an embedded iLO2 chip which offers a similar set of features. However, Sun also provides full remote control and virtual media services as standard whereas HP expects you to pay extra for the privilege. What you don't get is any of the sophisticated power capping, metering and regulation features offered by HP.
Although we were mightily impressed with the Sun Fire X4140 we can't say the same for the X2270. It does offer a good hardware specification for the price with some unique storage options but it's noisy and we were disappointed with its appetite for power as it flies in the face of Intel's claims for its 5500 processors.
Sun's sudden acquisition agreement with Oracle is also cause for contemplation although this move would give the latter the ability to provide an end-to-end solution for all its products. The X2270 may not be the best example of the Sun Fire server family but Oracle is nevertheless getting its hands on a very impressive range of products.
Author: Dave Mitchell
From around the web
advertisement
- Google legal chief: privacy laws too hard on SMBs
- No free Visual Studio for Windows 8 desktop developers
- Facebook spends $1bn on Instagram... then launches its own Camera app
- Who sends Google the most takedown notices? Microsoft
- Microsoft wins text patent battle against Motorola
- Watchdog fines firm £50,000 over Android malware
- Intel to test smartcity future on London
- June decision on Microsoft's billion-dollar EU fine
- Yahoo browser launch marred by security flaw
- Autonomy management walk out over HP bureaucracy
- Laptop bag reviews: nine tested
- Sony VAIO T Series Ultrabook review: first look
- Revealed: the military standards and robots HP uses to test its laptops
- Windows 8: multi-monitors and double standards?
- Why is TalkTalk's year-old porn filter suddenly big news?
- Why are laptop screens so far behind mobiles?
- HP EliteBook Folio review: first look
- The shoebox-sized all-in-one printer
- Forget the Ultrabook: here comes the HP Sleekbook
- HP Spectre XT review: first look
- Can you buy technology with a clean conscience?
- The death of email
- How to use Windows 8 Metro
- 30 best features of Windows 8
- How to become a cyberspy
- Create your own smart home
- Install a custom ROM on your smartphone
- Can the Raspberry Pi save computing?
- Google: the pirates' best friend?
- Backups: ten tips to keep your data safe
- Why you have to be left in the dark on OS patches
- Is Microsoft mismanaging Windows on ARM?
- Dealing with spam surrogates
- Why 3G broadband can be better and cheaper than ADSL
- Is Twitter bad for business?
- Publishing your email address isn't a security disaster
- Why you'll need a fax machine to develop iOS apps
- Learning to adapt to the mobile web
- Why you shouldn't use WPS on your Wi-Fi network
- Disabled users suffer when software breaks the rules
advertisement





