Skip to navigation

HP Scanjet 4070 Photosmart review

Verdict

Great quality for both photos and negatives, but slower and more frustrating to use than the Epson Perfection 2580 Photo

Review Date: 20 Jul 2005

Price when reviewed: (£80 inc VAT)

Overall Rating
5 stars out of 6

It's safe to say from the outset that we were hugely impressed by the HP's quality. A quick glance at the Quality scores on p128 reveals why - the HP scored nine or more in five of our six tests.

The 4070, like most of the scanners here, has an optical resolution (horizontally) of 2,400ppi. The sheer level of detail it can produce without introducing noise is very impressive.

Scanning our snack box at 600ppi revealed almost no clipping, while subtle colour gradations were faithfully scanned. Our mono image was superbly reproduced. The 4070 showed off a good dynamic range and captured more detail than Epson's 2580.

The HP also has some tools for colour restoration. Although none are useful for mono or damaged photos, the 4070 successfully removed the red cast from our faded Kodachrome print.

There are some frustrating features. The transparency adaptor also holds 12 reflective prints to allow for quick scanning, but it covers about 10mm of the sides and the top of the prints. Not only does this mean carefully composed images will be cropped, it also means that you won't be able to print 6 x 4in scans without stretching the image or leaving borders at the edges. The adaptor also has twin holders for negatives. You can scan two frames from each strip before turning them over. This is inconvenient, but faster than scanning single frames as with the Canon.

At least quality was good. A slight red colour cast prevented a perfect score, but HP's Image Zone scanning software lets you adjust the brightness of highlights, shadows and midtones. The software annoyingly forgets your settings each time you close it, but once you've found optimum settings you can explicitly save them.

Disappointingly, there's no auto-crop feature, so you have to manually select the scan area each time. There's no way to scan multiple images at once either - only the Xerox shares this shortfall.

Speed was nothing special compared to the Canon and Epson scanners - the HP was slightly slower, but still took only 20 seconds for a 7 x 5in 600ppi scan. A preview took ten seconds, but scanning a 35mm negative at the maximum optical resolution took two minutes, 28 seconds.

We liked the HP for its image quality. But considering the aggravating features such as the photo holder and scanning software, as well as the slower speed, the similarly priced Epson is clearly the better buy.

Subscribe to PC Pro magazine. We'll give you 3 issues for £1 plus a free gift - click here

From around the web

Be the first to comment this article

You need to Login or Register to comment.

(optional)

Latest Category Reviews
Fujitsu ScanSnap S1100 review

Fujitsu ScanSnap S1100

Category: Scanners
Rating: 5 out of 6
Price: £157
Plustek MobileOffice S400 review

Plustek MobileOffice S400

Category: Scanners
Rating: 3 out of 6
Price: £123
Plustek MobileOffice AD450 review

Plustek MobileOffice AD450

Category: Scanners
Rating: 3 out of 6
Price: £216
Fujitsu ScanSnap S1300 review

Fujitsu ScanSnap S1300

Category: Scanners
Rating: 4 out of 6
Price: £221
Plustek SmartPhoto F50 review

Plustek SmartPhoto F50

Category: Peripherals
Rating: 2 out of 6
Price: £60

advertisement

More From PC Pro
Latest News Stories Subscribe to our RSS Feeds
Latest Blog Posts Subscribe to our RSS Feeds
Latest Features
Latest Real World Computing

advertisement

Sponsored Links
 
 
SEARCH
SIGN UP

Your email:

Your password:

remember me

advertisement


Hitwise Top 10 Website 2010
 
 

PCPro-Computing in the Real World Printed from www.pcpro.co.uk

Register to receive our regular email newsletter at http://www.pcpro.co.uk/registration.

The newsletter contains links to our latest PC news, product reviews, features and how-to guides, plus special offers and competitions.