Intel Haswell review
An all-new processor architecture brings upgrades across the board, with beefed-up graphics and numerous power-saving optimisations
Review Date: 4 Jun 2013
Reviewed By: Darien Graham-Smith
Price when reviewed: Various
After more than 18 months of anticipation, the Intel Haswell architecture is finally here. Haswell – officially known as 4th Generation Intel Core – promises to reduce power requirements and boost performance, especially in the arena of graphics.
Haswell UltrabooksUltrabooks using Haswell CPUs must meet new hardware requirements, including a touchscreen, wireless display technology and an idle battery life of at least nine hours. Laptops that don’t meet these requirements can't use the Ultrabook brand.
Haswell chips are built on the same 22nm process as Ivy Bridge, so the power savings aren’t achieved through miniaturisation. They’re the result of two technical innovations. The first is a new power management framework, which lets the CPU handle device driver events in scheduled batches, rather than in real time, so it can spend more time powered down between bursts of activity. Intel estimates this improvement can cut power consumption on a regular laptop by around 20%.
The second innovation is a structural change. In low-power processors aimed at Ultrabooks and tablets – denoted by model numbers suffixed with U and Y – the chipset has been moved into the CPU package. This reduces the amount of energy wasted as heat, and gives the processor better control over its power budget. Intel says this allows a “20x” increase in battery life, although in reality this applies only to laptops or tablets in standby mode.
When it comes to actually running code, Haswell brings numerous architectural improvements over previous designs. For the technically minded, these include better branch prediction, a larger translation lookaside buffer, improved out-of-order execution capabilities and a doubling of cache bandwidth. The updated AVX2 instruction set brings new functions, too. In theory, this should give fourth-generation processors a performance edge over their Ivy Bridge forebears in almost every application.
So it proves with the first Haswell chip to emerge, the Core i7-4770K. As the name suggests, this is a direct successor to the Ivy Bridge i7-3770K, and like its predecessor, it’s a desktop quad-core chip – supporting eight threads, thanks to Intel’s Hyper-Threading technology – with a base frequency of 3.5GHz and 8MB of L3 cache. It isn’t a drop-in replacement for the old chip, however: Haswell desktop processors use the new LGA 1150 socket and a new 8 Series chipset.
When benchmarked in Windows 7 with 8GB of RAM, this top-of-the-range model scored 1.16 overall, with respective scores of 1.09, 1.22 and 1.17 for responsiveness, media and multitasking. That’s a fair lick faster than the Ivy Bridge Core i7-3770K, which scored 1.06 in an identical configuration, and well ahead of AMD’s most powerful desktop processor, the FX 8350, which scored 0.95.
Stepping up to Windows 8 knocked 10% off the i7-4770K’s responsiveness score, but nonetheless, the system scored a respectable 1.12 overall. It’s reasonable to expect a comparable step up in speed, compared to the previous generation, across all Haswell chips.
Since this particular processor is a “K” model, you can also overclock its Turbo multipliers; we found the chip ran stably using its stock cooler with its maximum Turbo speed turned up from 3.9GHz to 4.4GHz. This allowed the system to achieve an overall score of 1.25, including a stellar 1.36 score in our media test.
Nice review, thanks Darien. Any idea when we can actually buy one of these and the requisite motherboards? I need a new PC and have been waiting for Haswell for some time.
By SirRoderickSpode on 1 Jun 2013
Slower in Windows 8?
Do we know why there is a drop in performance on Windows 8?
By Lee_Grant on 1 Jun 2013
Hmm, my second generation Core i laptop got a speed increase with Windows 8, or at least it feels more responsive.
Can you give more information on how you measure responsiveness?
By big_D on 2 Jun 2013
What a nonsense
"Intel says this allows a “20x” increase in battery life"
I hear promises of "up to xxx times longer battery life", and my laptop works for around 4 hours just like it did 10 years ago. Marketing bull****t
By radnor on 3 Jun 2013
Gaming is still out of the question
Also I'd like to point out that Crysis was released in 2007. It's not a "modern game" by any standards.
By radnor on 3 Jun 2013
You helpfully provide an AMD processor for reference in your desktop performance graph on page 1 of this review. So why is the same AMD processor not included in your 3D performance graph on page 2?
By Kuryakin on 3 Jun 2013
By Mat1971 on 3 Jun 2013
In blackadder goes forth there is a moment when the sum total of months of battle resulted in moving General Haig's desk 3ft closer to Berlin. New Intel processors are almost as exciting. But I suppose a 9% generation-generation improvement by Intel is better than AMD's 4%.
By milliganp on 5 Jun 2013
More of the same
We’ve been stuck at or around the 3 GHz mark now for over 10 years, surely we should all be on 10 GHz CPU’s by now even if it meant larger chips.
Someone need to give Intel a kick up the backside, no wonder desktop PC’s aren’t selling.
By dholbon on 6 Jun 2013
increasing clock speeds would be nice but its really the architecture and improvements to instructions which benefit cpus
i cant even imagine how dreadful a 10ghz Pentium 4 would be compared to our modern 3ghz dual cores
By Emodan666 on 6 Jun 2013
- Toshiba beats retreat from consumer PC market
- Google to follow Apple with device encryption
- U2 and Apple working on "new music format"
- Ellison steps down: but who's really running Oracle now?
- Audioboo to become Audioboom in app revamp
- Apple slaps down Google and police, as it takes high ground on user privacy
- Amazon releases high-end Kindle Voyage Touch
- What's on this week's PC Pro podcast?
- Virgin carpeted again for broadband speed claims
- Microsoft set to make more job cuts
- How to check your identity hasn’t been sold to the hackers
- Tim Cook: this is how much TV has changed since the 70s
- Westminster wins the .London battle
- 20 years of PC Pro: from deep pan pizza to virtualisation
- Five reasons why the Apple Watch leaves me cold
- Apple Watch, iPhone 6 and 6 Plus: Tim Cook's Apple back with a bang?
- BT Home Hub 5: how to get maximum speed
- 20 years of PC Pro: one-star reviews (including "the worst tablet we've ever seen")
- 20 years of PC Pro: our best covers
- Why we've closed the PC Pro forums
- The 7 best Chromebooks of 2014
- iPhone 6 vs Galaxy S5: is the Apple or Samsung flagship smartphone right for you?
- How to install iOS 8 without deleting apps and data
- The best smartwatches of 2014: what's the best smartwatch?
- Nexus 6 (X or Shamu) release date, price and specs rumour roundup
- Best of IDF: top tech and memorable moments from Intel's tech show
- How Apple Pay works and how to use it on your iPhone 6 or Apple Watch
- Tech of the future... and the British boffins building it
- Abuse magnets: the people behind corporate Twitter accounts
- Putting people at the centre of software design
- How to sell more ebooks on Amazon
- 10 ways to make your business more secure
- Top five VoIP mistakes
- How to add in-app purchasing to an iPhone, Android or Windows app
- Remote-control ransomware: TeamViewer and software hardball
- Why laptops with serial ports matter to the Internet of Things
- Make your mobile battery last longer
- Small steps into handling Big Data
- Nexus 5: does it really run stock Android?
- How to get broadband to a garden office