AMD A8-3870K review
Cheap and, thanks to a fine balance of application and gaming power, a great option for budget PCs
Review Date: 4 Sep 2012
Reviewed By: Mike Jennings
Price when reviewed: £66 (£79 inc VAT)
Features & Design
Value for Money
AMD hasn’t had the best couple of years when it comes to processors but, despite its disappointing FX chips, the firm’s APUs – those with integrated graphics – have proved both innovative and successful.
Originally dubbed “Fusion” but released under the A-series branding, APUs combine traditional processors with Radeon graphics cores. With both crammed into the same package, it’s a combination AMD hopes will woo those buying at the budget end of the market. The firm theorises many will happily trade some application performance for better gaming grunt.
The A8-3870K wasn’t released in the first wave of A-series APUs, but now it’s at the top of the stack – a quad-core chip running at 3GHz, with 4MB of L2 cache and an unlocked multiplier. Unlike Intel chips, there’s no sign of Hyper-Threading and, surprisingly, unlike weaker A-series parts, there’s no Turbo Core – so you’re stuck at 3GHz unless you overclock.
Graphics power comes from a Radeon HD 6550D. It's the most powerful graphics core in any of AMD's APUs, and it’s based on the Redwood architecture that underpinned the Radeon HD 5550, 5570 and 5670 discrete cards. That means a specification better than we’re used to seeing in integrated graphics: 400 stream processors, and a clock running at 600MHz.
The A8-3870K rattled through our Low quality 1,366 x 768 Crysis test at 68fps, 15fps faster than Intel’s top integrated chip, the HD Graphics 4000 GPU, in a Core i7-3770K. The A8-3870K’s 45fps average in the Just Cause 2 Low quality test was eight frames quicker than the Intel chip, and only in DiRT 3 did Intel catch up, each scoring 61fps.
The A8-3870K trounces Intel’s best-integrated offerings but, more importantly, it also puts paid to low-end discrete graphics cards. Both AMD’s Radeon HD 6450 and Nvidia’s GeForce GT 520 scored a much lower 41fps in the Low quality Crysis benchmark.
When it comes to application benchmarks, the A8-3870K is less impressive. A score of 0.7 is fast enough to handle everyday applications, but it doesn’t compare favourably with rivals: it’s slower than every Intel Core i3 chip bar the low-power versions, and it's slower than all the AMD FX CPUs.
At £79, however, we're willing to overlook that, since it's cheaper than every current-generation Core i3 processor and, makes up for its slightly disappointing application benchmarks with best-in-class gaming performance. The A8-3870K strikes a fine balance, and it's the chip we recommend for building a budget PC – at least until the next wave of APUs arrive.
Author: Mike Jennings
Where is the review I really want to read. Trinity is where we see real performance and value for money that does compete well with intel's i7 especially in graphics.
By nicomo on 4 Sep 2012
Why is a bad application score but a good graphics mark make this a good processor? Gamers aren't going to be using processor such as these and they make a minority of the market.
By artiss on 4 Sep 2012
I get it...
I think that we are at a stage where application score is more than good enough, even on laptops. The bottlenecks are clearly on the GPU side, not only for gaming but for HD playback, Photo/Video editing, etc.
This CPU seems to strike a great balance.
By TheMegamale on 5 Sep 2012
You're missing the point.
This chip is aimed for budget systems. The kind of system a family shares to do homework, internet and games. MegaMale gets the concept of this perfectly... for everyday use it's the gpu that struggles in todays environment. Hardcore gamers would be going for top end cpus and gpus in sli/x-fire configs. This is a budget apu aimed at the budget market and this is where balance counts.
By JmLing on 6 Sep 2012
- Amazon Phone: does anyone want a 3D handset?
- Virgin email fiasco hits thousands of users
- Chrome Remote Desktop now available on Android
- Google posts "average quarter" with slow growth
- What's on this week's PC Pro podcast?
- BBC iPlayer lets Android devices download shows
- Google's Project Ara modular phone arrives in January
- Hackers harvest LaCie card data for a full year
- Ubuntu LTS Server 14.04 extends cloud support
- Samsung Galaxy S5 outselling the S4
- Windows 8.1 Update: an abject surrender
- The insane economics of Sky Now TV
- No such thing as a free app... so pay up if you want quality
- Time to outlaw crapware-laden installers
- Windows Phone 8.1 video: hands-on
- Office for iPad: key information
- Why every PC buyer owes Richard Durkin a debt of gratitude
- HTC One M8 vs Samsung Galaxy S5: 2014's big-hitters compared
- Windows XP end of life: key information
- Cut out the broadband jargon? What jargon?
- Data recovery: inside the clean room
- Best tablet PCs to buy in 2014
- How much RAM do you really need?
- News of the weird: the strangest ever tech stories
- Five hyped technologies: disruptive or not?
- Piracy's dying: why we're all going straight
- Office: should you buy it, rent it - or dump it?
- Make the most of your mobile data
- Old-school internet scams: five that just won't die
- Bitcoin believers not worried by Mt. Gox disarray
- Small steps into handling Big Data
- Nexus 5: does it really run stock Android?
- How to get broadband to a garden office
- How to write your company's IT security policy
- Raspberry Pi and Wolfram: a must-have for every child
- Could you get by with Office Web Apps?
- The best Android antivirus apps for 2014
- Headings vs headers: how to use both in Word
- Windows Server 2012 R2: how the Datacenter edition could change SMBs
- Invoices and VAT: how to set up your documents correctly