AMD FX "Bulldozer" review
Verdict
Unable to compete on speed and price, which means one thing - Intel still rules the roost
Review Date: 12 Oct 2011
Reviewed By: Mike Jennings
Price when reviewed: (£195 inc VAT)
It took AMD a long time to bring it to market, but Bulldozer is finally here to offer Intel's all-conquering Sandy Bridge chips some much-needed competition. That's AMD's intention, anyway.
Bulldozer is henceforth to be known as AMD FX: the new range consists of four chips, from the £95 FX-4100 to the high-end, £195 FX-8150, and they share a brand new 32nm, socket AM3+ architecture.
AMD's headline innovation is what it calls "Bulldozer Modules" - processor cores containing two physical execution units, and hence able to service two threads simultaneously. Each module features only a single shared pipeline, and a single floating-point arithmetic unit, so it's not a fully dual-core design - but it should still deliver greater parallel throughput than one of Intel's Hyper-Threading cores, which offer only a single execution unit.
In practice, it means AMD's top-end FX-8150, with four modules, can process eight threads at once, bringing it into line with the best Intel chips. The cheaper FX-6100 has three modules serving six threads, and the FX-4100 has two modules to process four threads.
On the top-end CPUs you get 2MB of L2 cache per module, shared between execution units, and each unit has its own L1 cache, scheduler and memory bandwidth. 8MB of L3 cache is shared across the whole chip.
AMD claims its new architecture allows each core to be more efficient at multitasking, and it's loaded the FX chips with a host of other improved features too. Turbo Core has been given a shot in the arm: last year's models could only overclock half of their cores, but now every core in an FX chip is capable of boosting by up to 300MHz.
That's less additional juice than before, but spread across more cores, which makes sense given AMD's focus on multi-threaded performance. Turbo Core also now includes a Max Turbo mode which boosts the clock further, but only across half a chip’s cores: the FX-8150, for instance, will now be able to run four of its 3.6GHz cores at a tasty 4.2GHz.
That's a bigger boost than you'll see from Intel, which uses Turbo Boost to overclock its Core i5-2500K from 3.3GHz to 3.7GHz, and its i7-2600K from 3.4GHz to 3.8GHz.
Every chip in the new AMD range is unlocked for easy overclocking, and they're all set up to handle dual-channel DDR3 memory running at up to 1,866MHz – an improvement over the 1,333MHz the old Phenom II could handle. Here, FX outstrips Sandy Bridge again, with the latter only officially handling up to 1,600MHz memory.
Top-end power requirements stay the same, with the most demanding chips possessing a TDP of 125W. AMD has introduced a new socket for its new CPUs, dubbed AM3+, but you might not need to upgrade: AMD’s FX chips are backwards-compatible with older AM3 boards with a BIOS update. Which motherboard manufacturers actually provide these, however, remains to be seen.
From around the web
bulldozer
kool so when do they hit the shops.......any links?
thanks....
By terranova on 12 Oct 2011 ![]()
I suspect that drivers may increase the performance considerably.
Aria are taking pre-orders that I've spotted.
By skarlock on 12 Oct 2011 ![]()
bulldozer
thanks i see novatech has the now too.......wooohooo
By terranova on 12 Oct 2011 ![]()
Interesting
They may not beat Intel on speed and price but they are still moving in the right direction .I have one question: How much is the L1 cache?
By DeanC on 12 Oct 2011 ![]()
No graphics?
These chips have no graphics processors? If this is so, AMD are throwing away their one major advantage over Intel. "As good as a mid-range Intel model in general processing PLUS a significant lead in graphics performance" would be compelling as a better balanced system.
I had hoped AMD were going down a radical modular approach so they could spin different combinations of integer, floating-point and graphics cores to suit different markets. But this actually seems pretty conservative in design.
By JohnAHind on 13 Oct 2011 ![]()
Intel leaves AMD in the rear view mirror!
What a shame. I've been hoping for an AMD comeback for ages. Clearly this isn't it. I just hope that if AMD eventually go under somebody buys what's left of ATI and keeps it going. I love their graphics cards for folding.
Shane
http://diekittymaschine.blogspot.com/
By ashane on 14 Oct 2011 ![]()
4GB of RAM in the test rig? That is pathetic. You may think that 4GB is enough for almost all benchmarks, but it is not. Even if only 2GB is constantly in use, there are often times where the memory usage peaks at a much higher value. A test rig for desktop CPUs should have 16GB RAM.
By dan22 on 26 Oct 2011 ![]()
advertisement
- What's on this week's PC Pro podcast?
- Porn site leaks millions of email addresses and passwords
- Top European court to rule on ACTA legality
- Dell posts record profit but consumer sales slide
- ICO investigating Google after cookie claims
- Megaupload founder Kim Dotcom bailed
- Government meddling could "chop cloud into pieces"
- Government "complacent" over space weather threat
- Canonical puts Ubuntu on Android smartphones
- Microsoft extends support for Windows Vista and 7
- Why is email so ugly?
- Is Apple right to leave old Macs stranded on Mountain Lion?
- Has BT given up on rural broadband?
- Is Hotmail's spam filtering really the "best in the business"?
- What Size Am I? A tech solution for a fashion problem
- Chrome's shine getting lost in translation
- BytePac: the cardboard hard disk enclosure
- How tech loosens our grip on reality
- Hokum watch: Safer Internet Day
- Why I'm deleting Adobe from my PC
- 10 free online tools for teaching and learning
- Buying music software for schools
- AMD: what went wrong?
- No room for Steve Jobs at the top of Mount Nikon
- The ultimate guide to passwords
- How Apple lulls Mac owners into a false sense of security
- Privacy - outdated luxury or public necessity?
- Building the bionic man
- The making of open-source software
- Top 10 stupid security stories of 2011
- Virtual fun with Fusion 4
- Is this finally the era of wysiwyg web design?
- An acceptable use policy for your kids
- Phone wars: why there's no "best" mobile platform
- Why virtualisation hasn't slowed the growth of data
- How to make Google AdWords work for your business
- The curse of sloppily written software
- Paying for your crimes with Bitcoin
- Behind the scenes: tech support for Formula 1
- The security risk of fat fingers
advertisement








