Intel Core i7-875K review
in Processors
Verdict
You still pay a premium for the i7 brand, but this kind of power has never been so affordable
Review Date: 28 May 2010
Reviewed By: Darien Graham-Smith
Price when reviewed: £297 (£349 inc VAT)
Value for Money
![]()
Performance
![]()
![]()
Intel's new Core i7-875K follows the same basic quad-core architecture as the existing i7-870, but it’s designed more for overclocking enthusiasts. While you can’t raise the basic frequency from 2.93GHz, you’re free to tweak the “Turbo Mode” multipliers that the CPU hits when it’s under heavy load.
We tested this new processor in an Intel DP55WG motherboard with 2GB of DDR3-1066 and an ATI Radeon HD 4550 graphics card (like all i7-800 series chips, the i7-875K uses the older 45nm Nehalem architecture that lacks an onboard GPU).
With default hardware settings, the i7-875K scored 1.93 — oddly, a slower score than the i7-870, which scored 2.03 in a comparable system. Presumably Intel has adjusted the default power envelope in a way that that makes the processor a little less eager to activate Turbo Mode. But you can raise this yourself to make more use of Turbo frequencies.
Even with the standard Intel cooler, the chip remained stable as we overclocked the Turbo Boost multipliers by up to five ticks. This saw the i5-875K blaze through our benchmarks at speeds up to 4.3GHz for a magnificent score of 2.31 – a level of performance we’ve only seen surpassed by top end i7-900 chips.
It’s not a chip for everybody: obtaining this excellent performance involved considerable trial and error, and several system crashes. It’s not cheap either. But compared to the price of a Core i7-900 processor, the i7-875K is a great deal for any enthusiast who’s chosen the LGA 1156 platform. (Click chart to enlarge)
Before you buy, check out the Core i5-655K, a strong dual-core alternative at around two thirds of the price. But for premium computing power, Intel’s latest quad-core offering is its most tempting yet.
Author: Darien Graham-Smith
From around the web
advertisement
- Google legal chief: privacy laws too hard on SMBs
- No free Visual Studio for Windows 8 desktop developers
- Facebook spends $1bn on Instagram... then launches its own Camera app
- Who sends Google the most takedown notices? Microsoft
- Microsoft wins text patent battle against Motorola
- Watchdog fines firm £50,000 over Android malware
- Intel to test smartcity future on London
- June decision on Microsoft's billion-dollar EU fine
- Yahoo browser launch marred by security flaw
- Autonomy management walk out over HP bureaucracy
- Laptop bag reviews: nine tested
- Sony VAIO T Series Ultrabook review: first look
- Revealed: the military standards and robots HP uses to test its laptops
- Windows 8: multi-monitors and double standards?
- Why is TalkTalk's year-old porn filter suddenly big news?
- Why are laptop screens so far behind mobiles?
- HP EliteBook Folio review: first look
- The shoebox-sized all-in-one printer
- Forget the Ultrabook: here comes the HP Sleekbook
- HP Spectre XT review: first look
- Can you buy technology with a clean conscience?
- The death of email
- How to use Windows 8 Metro
- 30 best features of Windows 8
- How to become a cyberspy
- Create your own smart home
- Install a custom ROM on your smartphone
- Can the Raspberry Pi save computing?
- Google: the pirates' best friend?
- Backups: ten tips to keep your data safe
- Why you have to be left in the dark on OS patches
- Is Microsoft mismanaging Windows on ARM?
- Dealing with spam surrogates
- Why 3G broadband can be better and cheaper than ADSL
- Is Twitter bad for business?
- Publishing your email address isn't a security disaster
- Why you'll need a fax machine to develop iOS apps
- Learning to adapt to the mobile web
- Why you shouldn't use WPS on your Wi-Fi network
- Disabled users suffer when software breaks the rules
advertisement






