AMD Phenom X3 review
A great new mid-range CPU - and the price is right too.
Review Date: 30 Apr 2008
Reviewed By: Darien Graham-Smith
Price when reviewed: (exc VAT)
After impressing us with its new quad-core Phenom X4 processors earlier this month, AMD has followed up by finally delivering the industry's first triple-core x86 processors, which it originally promised last September .
The three new chips are, logically enough, designated the Phenom X3 series. They're based on the same internal design as the X4 parts, with the same cache arrangements (512KB L2 cache per core, plus 2MB shared L3 cache) and the same 3.6GHz effective HyperTransport. The only major difference is that one of the cores is completely disabled. AMD calls this variant the Toliman core.
The low-end part - the X3 8450 - is the slowest Phenom yet, at 2.1GHz, with the mid-range X3 8650 and top end 2.4GHz X3 8750 clocked at 2.3GHz and 2.4GHz respectively. Oddly, there's no 2.2GHz part, though there's clearly a space for it in the line-up. Despite having one core fewer, the X3s have the same 95W TDP as most X4s.
We've noted before that Windows applications typically derive only a small benefit from extra cores. It's no surprise, therefore, that the triple-core Phenoms aren't far behind the quad-cores in our real-world benchmarks, with the three new parts scoring 1.25, 1.35 and 1.40 at their respective stock speeds.
That's a difference of only around 7% between identically-clocked X3 and X4 parts, and makes the X3 8750 slightly faster, overall, than the X4 9550, which scored 1.39.
As our graph shows, the Phenom X3 doesn't break new ground in terms of bang-per-buck: AMD's high-end Athlon X2s already offer similar performance at a similar price. But the Phenom brings a lower TDP to the table (the fastest Athlons draw 125W), plus an extra core, which can only help as multithreading becomes more pervasive. And, despite these improvements, Phenoms are currently slightly cheaper than comparable Athlons.
So while the X3 may not be as revolutionary as the X4, it's a wholly positive evolutionary step. If you're looking for a capable processor that doesn't cost the earth, it's an excellent choice.
Author: Darien Graham-Smith
- Nokia Lumia 2520 tablet sales halted over faulty charger
- Microsoft slashes custom XP support price
- Amazon Phone: does anyone want a 3D handset?
- Virgin email fiasco hits thousands of users
- Chrome Remote Desktop now available on Android
- Google posts "average quarter" with slow growth
- What's on this week's PC Pro podcast?
- BBC iPlayer lets Android devices download shows
- Google's Project Ara modular phone arrives in January
- Hackers harvest LaCie card data for a full year
- Windows 8.1 Update: an abject surrender
- The insane economics of Sky Now TV
- No such thing as a free app... so pay up if you want quality
- Time to outlaw crapware-laden installers
- Windows Phone 8.1 video: hands-on
- Office for iPad: key information
- Why every PC buyer owes Richard Durkin a debt of gratitude
- HTC One M8 vs Samsung Galaxy S5: 2014's big-hitters compared
- Windows XP end of life: key information
- Cut out the broadband jargon? What jargon?
- The great iPhone ripoff and how it works
- Heartbleed: what you need to know and do
- Data recovery: inside the clean room
- Best tablet PCs to buy in 2014
- How much RAM do you really need?
- News of the weird: the strangest ever tech stories
- Five hyped technologies: disruptive or not?
- Piracy's dying: why we're all going straight
- Office: should you buy it, rent it - or dump it?
- Make the most of your mobile data
- Make your mobile battery last longer
- Small steps into handling Big Data
- Nexus 5: does it really run stock Android?
- How to get broadband to a garden office
- How to write your company's IT security policy
- Raspberry Pi and Wolfram: a must-have for every child
- Could you get by with Office Web Apps?
- The best Android antivirus apps for 2014
- Headings vs headers: how to use both in Word
- Windows Server 2012 R2: how the Datacenter edition could change SMBs