Intel Core 2 Extreme Edition QX9770 review
In a moderately blatant attempt to fully steal Phenom's performance thunder, Intel has released samples of its Extreme edition CPU slated to be released at the beginning of 2008. The QX9770 is architecturally identical to the current top-end QX9650, but with a speed hike to 3.2GHz and a 1,600MHz FSB. TDP (thermal design power) is up to a hefty 136W, but in practical use it doesn't appear to use anything like that much.
The eagle-eyed among you will spot the fact the new part has an FSB of 1,600MHz must mean that there's no way to test it - there's no consumer-level chipset with an FSB frequency over 1,333MHz. Fortunately the Gigabyte X38-chipset-based GA-X38T-DQ6 runs perfectly happily at the higher speed.
The QX97700 is outrageously overclockable. When we first fired up our test system, it defaulted to the wrong FSB and clock multiplier settings, giving a clock speed of 3.6GHz. Our benchmarks ran without a hitch at this speed. This is without the heatsink even being clamped down.
You'll have to wait to get your hands on one though; Intel's official word is that it will be released "In Q1 2008" and will cost "More than the current QX9650". That's to say, more than £500.
As a technology demonstration it's extraordinarily impressive; as a shoddy tactic to steal AMD's thunder it's less so. But with AMD struggling to find its feet with production of the competitor Phenom FX parts, there's currently no alternative if you want the fastest possible desktop processor regardless of cost.
Author: David Fearon
From around the web
advertisement
- Google legal chief: privacy laws too hard on SMBs
- No free Visual Studio for Windows 8 desktop developers
- Facebook spends $1bn on Instagram... then launches its own Camera app
- Who sends Google the most takedown notices? Microsoft
- Microsoft wins text patent battle against Motorola
- Watchdog fines firm £50,000 over Android malware
- Intel to test smartcity future on London
- June decision on Microsoft's billion-dollar EU fine
- Yahoo browser launch marred by security flaw
- Autonomy management walk out over HP bureaucracy
- Laptop bag reviews: nine tested
- Sony VAIO T Series Ultrabook review: first look
- Revealed: the military standards and robots HP uses to test its laptops
- Windows 8: multi-monitors and double standards?
- Why is TalkTalk's year-old porn filter suddenly big news?
- Why are laptop screens so far behind mobiles?
- HP EliteBook Folio review: first look
- The shoebox-sized all-in-one printer
- Forget the Ultrabook: here comes the HP Sleekbook
- HP Spectre XT review: first look
- Can you buy technology with a clean conscience?
- The death of email
- How to use Windows 8 Metro
- 30 best features of Windows 8
- How to become a cyberspy
- Create your own smart home
- Install a custom ROM on your smartphone
- Can the Raspberry Pi save computing?
- Google: the pirates' best friend?
- Backups: ten tips to keep your data safe
- Why you have to be left in the dark on OS patches
- Is Microsoft mismanaging Windows on ARM?
- Dealing with spam surrogates
- Why 3G broadband can be better and cheaper than ADSL
- Is Twitter bad for business?
- Publishing your email address isn't a security disaster
- Why you'll need a fax machine to develop iOS apps
- Learning to adapt to the mobile web
- Why you shouldn't use WPS on your Wi-Fi network
- Disabled users suffer when software breaks the rules
advertisement






