HP Photosmart 5510 review
Verdict
Small, sleek and perfectly good enough for most home users – a bargain of an all-in-one
Review Date: 24 Jan 2012
Reviewed By: David Bayon
Price when reviewed: £42 (£50 inc VAT)
Buy it now for: £78
(see more store prices)
Features & Design
![]()
Value for Money
![]()
Performance
![]()
![]()
An all-in-one needn’t be perfect: a low price and adequate quality will suffice for many. Step forward the remarkable HP Photosmart 5510, which manages to retain a good deal of what’s right about the rest of the Photosmart range, but in a device that costs a mere £50.
To hit that low price, HP has stripped it of extras, so there’s no duplex module, the input and output trays hold only 80 and 15 sheets respectively, and its big tablet-style interface looks a bit odd with a tiny 2.4in screen in the middle of it. But that doesn’t mean this is a low-end device. It’s a touchscreen, albeit with a rather cramped menu system, and you get Wi-Fi to go with the standard USB connection. It’s also compact and rather stylish, with its matte finish and rounded pebble shape, which we don’t generally expect for this kind of money.
The 5510 uses four inks, and it will accept the XL variety to reduce A4 page costs to a reasonable 2.2p for mono and 6.6p for colour. A 6 x 4in photo costs a middling 19.1p.
But it isn’t quite the same print engine as the dearer Photosmarts: HP makes far lower claims for its speed than with the 7510, and our measured output rates of 10.5ppm for mono and 5ppm for colour bear that out. Where it loses further ground is in the scan tests, with the 5510 taking 26 seconds for an A4 300ppi capture and 43 seconds for a 6 x 4in capture at 600ppi – that's slow by any standards.
The quality holds up to the budget cuts far better than the pace, with photos looking almost identical to the dearer 7510. Text is the one print test where the 5510 falters, but a bit of minor spidering isn’t a disaster. More importantly, its scans meet HP’s usual high standards, beating far dearer devices for sharpness, colour tone and quality. It's a superb imaging device.
It’s tempting to say you should spend more on a higher-end device if you can afford to, but the truth of the matter is that for an awful lot of home users the Photosmart 5510 will be more than good enough. It’s compact and stylish enough for a living room, it’s cheap to buy and not too dear to run, and for the majority of purposes its output is great. At this price it's a steal.
Author: David Bayon
Best Prices
Price comparison powered by 
| Prices, delivery and availability at 2 retailers | Go | |
|
£121 | Go |
All-in-ones
While this review is interesting, I am very disappointed that reviews of stand-alone printers and scanners seem to have been axed. Persaonally I have separate units in order to have the best of both worlds.
By MauriceS on 26 Jan 2012 ![]()
Wonky allignment
I bought one of these based on the strength of the review and am mildly disappointed that all A4 prints come out wonky. The plastic paper guides aren't straight and a Google search reveals this is a generic issue. The buyer comments on Amazon.co.uk also highlight this. While I didnt buy this as a photo printer, I am also a bit disappointed with the quality of photos. It's a nice looking unit, and set up was easy, but the alignment issue is almost unforgivable and from my research, a frequently occuring fault.
By philiplgbennett on 30 Jan 2012 ![]()
Wonky allignment
I bought one of these based on the strength of the review and am mildly disappointed that all A4 prints come out wonky. The plastic paper guides aren't straight and a Google search reveals this is a generic issue. The buyer comments on Amazon.co.uk also highlight this. While I didnt buy this as a photo printer, I am also a bit disappointed with the quality of photos. It's a nice looking unit, and set up was easy, but the alignment issue is almost unforgivable and from my research, a frequently occuring fault.
By philiplgbennett on 30 Jan 2012 ![]()
advertisement
- BBC admits £100 million IT project was a "waste"
- ISPs offer network-level porn filters to dodge "regulatory threats"
- Intel: PC designs "not compelling enough"
- Microsoft reinstates the Start button – on a mouse
- Facebook tells EE to stall launch of HTC First
- Google considers $1 billion bid for satnav firm Waze
- Hyperoptic extends 1Gbit/sec broadband beyond London
- PC Pro Enhanced: an update
- Samsung racks up ten million Galaxy S4 shipments
- Lenovo defies PC slump to post 90% profit increase
- Is it worth upgrading a media centre to Windows 8?
- Flickr redesign: is it enough to tempt photographers back?
- Hands on with the new Google Maps
- Nokia Lumia 925 review: first look
- Why I won't subscribe to Creative Cloud
- GoPro camera strapped to a remote-control helicopter: the ultimate boy's toy
- Acer Iconia A1 review: first look
- Acer Aspire P3 review: first look
- Acer Aspire R7 review: first look
- How we produce the PC Pro podcast
- 38 best iPad apps
- 35 best web apps
- Software subscriptions return us to a life of servitude
- Dropbox: everything you need to know
- Best smartphones for 2013
- The best broadband speed tests
- iPhone apps for business travel
- How to get a job as a mobile games developer
- 25 best Windows 8 apps
- Introducing Arduino - a simple Raspberry Pi alternative
- The ICO's shame-faced u-turn on cookies
- Start8 and ModernMix: making Windows 8 work on a desktop
- How to boost your mobile reception
- How to fix Facebook: Social Fixer
- Taking the stress out of WordPress updates
- Where to download free web fonts
- Turn your tablet into a Sky+ remote control
- How to measure the success of a new IT system
- Three years on: the state of the tablet market
- Windows 8: what works and what doesn't
advertisement
Software Store
Competitions
There are dozens of exciting prizes up for grabs on PC Pro Competitions. All our competitions are free to enter. Try your luck.
ENTER NOW






