Canon Pixma MX885 review
Produces high-quality results at good speeds, but we’re not convinced that justifies the running costs
Review Date: 10 Jun 2011
Reviewed By: David Bayon
Price when reviewed: £121 (£145 inc VAT)
Features & Design
Value for Money
Canon long ago introduced the concept of the half-touch, half-display interface to its consumer all-in-ones, and now the office range gets the same treatment – of a sort. The new flagship Pixma MX885 comes in an all-black design, with a 3in screen surrounded not by touch buttons this time, but by a grid of tiles with glowing labels that change to match the menu onscreen.
It works well, particularly when you think back to the old circular navigation buttons it replaces. Four Scan, Copy, Fax and Card buttons take you into the relevant menus, with the tiles switching to navigation controls or number pads as required. The screen itself is still a little cramped next to the touch panel of a device such as the Lexmark Interact S605, but you’ll be fluent in no time.
Aside from that, nothing else has changed feature-wise from the previous flagship, the MX870. A choice of USB, Ethernet and Wi-Fi ticks all the boxes for small office environments, and it has two 150-sheet input trays and a 35-sheet ADF on top. You also get an integrated duplexer to save on paper costs.
What has changed a little is the print engine. We measured a solid 10ppm in mono, up from the MX870’s 8.8ppm, and even if the colour speeds haven’t risen, they’re identical to the A-Listed standalone Pixma iP4850, at 6.1ppm for documents and 46 seconds for a top-quality 6 x 4in photo.
It uses the same five inks (with both a dye-based and pigmented black) as Canon has been using in its top-end printers for some time now, so the quality is typically excellent. Photos are near-flawless, with deep, rich tones and no visible banding or speckling. Normal-quality text is thick and solid, and even draft text is usable for all but the most important print jobs.
Scans are still Canon’s weakest point, although we’re now talking a small deficiency rather than anything to get worried about. Faint striping could be seen on some photo scans, but colours are now perfectly acceptable, and copies also looked accurate, if a little soft in places.
But there’s a bigger issue that’s been creeping into the Pixma range over the last few models. Put simply, they’re getting increasingly expensive: with five inks to replace, each costing more than £12 inc VAT, A4 documents will set you back 4p for mono and 11.3p for colour. A 6 x 4in photo at standard quality costs 20.7p, and that’s before paper costs are considered.
It’s not just the MX885, either: the same inks go in the iP4850 and MG6150 – the best standalone and all-in-one inkjets we’ve tested – and their price seems to have been trickling steadily upwards over the last few years. HP’s Officejet printers will print documents for as little as 3p per colour page, while even Lexmark’s outlandish Genesis upright printer managed 9.5p per page.
Don’t get us wrong, the MX885 is another fine Canon all-in-one, and a great choice for a small office if quality and speed are of the utmost importance. But we’re reaching the point where it’s difficult to justify the cost of that quality, and that means we can’t fully recommend this otherwise excellent Pixma.
Author: David Bayon
Less printer, more document scanner
I agree about the cost of printing but prefer to turn it around for this product. I use the MX870 and think the following argument works just as well for this ...
For those trying to cut down on paper files, this product stands out.
Where else could you get a duplex document scanner with auto document feed for this price? For the office, the key thing is to get documents scanned quickly and reliably and this does it well.
And with an 'emergency' printer thrown in.
By kevinsefton on 26 Jul 2011
- Microsoft refuses to hand over customer emails
- Microsoft yanks Windows 8.1 update after crash reports
- Microsoft backtracks on blocking out-of-date Java
- Gartner: time to start planning your Windows 7 upgrade
- Still on IE8? You've got 18 months to upgrade
- Who's buying Chromebooks? American schools
- Microsoft targets Windows in next Patch Tuesday
- Microsoft to block old ActiveX controls in security push
- Samsung and Apple call off all legal disputes, except in the US
- Microsoft ordered to hand over European data
- 20 years of PC Pro: our best covers
- Why we've closed the PC Pro forums
- How to turn off Google Location Tracking
- 20 years of PC Pro: our greatest review mistakes
- 20 years of PC Pro: our first A-List
- Wikipedia's "right to be forgotten" protest hits the wrong note
- 3D printing hits the high street for plastic selfies
- 20 years of PC Pro: What amazed us in our first issue
- How Google Glass ruined my lunch hour
- Smartphone battery packs: can a USB power pack beat the festival battery blues?
- How to set up a wireless hotspot for your business: give customers free or paid for internet access
- Five worst SMB security threats... and how to solve them
- Doing business in a social era
- How to configure SysLookup for your network
- The 18 best Outlook tips for increasing productivity: become an Outlook expert with these lesser-known tips
- Office: should you buy it, rent it - or dump it?
- Small server vs cloud: which is best for SMBs?
- The best mobile apps for business
- Windows XP: Microsoft’s ticking time bomb
- gTLDs: what your business should know about new domain names
- How to sell more ebooks on Amazon
- 10 ways to make your business more secure
- Top five VoIP mistakes
- How to add in-app purchasing to an iPhone, Android or Windows app
- Remote-control ransomware: TeamViewer and software hardball
- Why laptops with serial ports matter to the Internet of Things
- Make your mobile battery last longer
- Small steps into handling Big Data
- Nexus 5: does it really run stock Android?
- How to get broadband to a garden office