Samsung ML-2525 review
in Printers
Verdict
A compact and stylish home device that's fairly cheap to buy and run
Review Date: 12 Jan 2010
Reviewed By: David Bayon
Price when reviewed: £79 (£93 inc VAT)
Buy it now for: £82
(see more store prices)
Features & Design
![]()
Value for Money
![]()
Performance
![]()
![]()
Samsung's personal mono lasers are among the most attractive we've seen, with their petite dimensions and stylish black finish. The ML-2525 keeps things simple, with a single USB connector and nothing so advanced as automatic duplex units or extra paper trays, but it's all the more usable for it. An extra nod to ease of use is the Print Screen button, which does exactly that: it takes whatever is on your monitor at the time and prints it out in landscape mode. It's a nice touch.
Samsung claims a print speed of 24ppm, and our tests almost reproduced that. Printing the standard 5% coverage letter at normal quality we recorded 22ppm, and the first page began rolling just seven seconds after we hit the print button. Switching to more complex DTP documents reduced that to 20ppm, but it remains impressive for such a tiny device.
Our quality test, a selection of gradients, fonts and photos, took just nine seconds and showed off the ML-2525's reasonable output. Characters were sharp and images had good contrast, although there was noticeable grain and black text on a grey background was a little frayed. It's certainly usable at this budget, though, so the minor weaknesses shouldn't detract too much.
The ML-2525 has a 250-sheet paper tray in its base, as well as a single-sheet feed on the front for other media such as envelopes and card stock. The paper feeds out onto the top of the printer, with space for 80 sheets once you flip out the plastic stopper. The rear of the device does stick out a little more than we'd like, but all in all it's a printer we'd certainly recommend for its looks and space-saving qualities.
Whether we'd recommend it on value is a different question. It comes with a 1,000-page starter cartridge, with standard (1,500) and high-yield (2,500) replacements available for around £38 exc VAT and £45 exc VAT respectively. For light users the Samsung compares well to our current mono A-Lister, the Brother HL-2035 – that device currently costs around £10 less to buy but has no high-yield cartridge option to cut costs as you print, and also has a replaceable drum to add to the outlay.
The ML-2525 matches the Brother for output quality, and it's faster, more compact and attractive, and will cost you slightly less in the long run if you print enough to get the most out of those bigger cartridges. All things considered, if you don't need the luxury of colour printing the Samsung is a great choice.
Author: David Bayon
Best Prices
From around the web
I ordered the Wireless version (ML252T5W) from Amazon in Nov @ £94 inc VAT & dely. No-one had any stock, but dely was for 1-3 months. The have just cancelled my order as they 'cannot get stock', bur other outlets now have it at £128-£149! Seems Amazon decided it would make a loss m
By incognitii on 13 Jan 2010 ![]()
contd
..a loss on the deal! BTW - Samsung Sales & Marketing staff are a waste of air - appalling!
Interestingly - can find no reviews of the wireless version online (launched Oct 09) - and in view of the dreadful problems people had setting up the 1610W (? or whatever it's predecessor was), would bee keen to know of people's experience with this?
By incognitii on 13 Jan 2010 ![]()
Typos
Apologies for the typos & hiatus above:
should read ML2525W
'bur other should read 'but other...)
'bee keen' should be 'be keen...'
Would be helpful if we could edit these posts?
By incognitii on 13 Jan 2010 ![]()
poor toner replacement cartridge performance
printer was initially inexpensive to purchase, print quality is good, speed is good.
BUT, the replacement cartridge was expensive at $92 and it claimed to average 1500 sheets.
i was able to get only about 700 sheets out of it before it was empty - just a few hundred more than the cartridge that came with the machine and less than half of the claimed average.
i'm not sure if this was a lemon of a replacement cartridge but samsung support was unwilling to replace it for me as the cartridge is considred a 'consumable'.
so far this machine is more expensive to operate than the old inkjet i was using prior- at about 13 cents per sheet.
i'm considering returning this machine as it so far is not doing the job it was claimed it could do.
By stuffy on 28 Sep 2010 ![]()
advertisement
- Chrome's shine getting lost in translation
- BytePac: the cardboard hard disk enclosure
- How tech loosens our grip on reality
- Hokum watch: Safer Internet Day
- Why I'm deleting Adobe from my PC
- Prepare to be patronised: it's Safer Internet Day
- Dear Sony, Samsung and every other tech company in the world: stop trying to be Apple
- Will Apple's Final Cut Pro X update placate the pros?
- Smartr Contacts for iPhone review
- Switching to Office 365's Outlook Web App
advertisement






