Epson Stylus Photo PX710W review
Top-quality photos at fast speeds, along with a good design and low running costs. Only text lets it down
Review Date: 19 Nov 2009
Reviewed By: David Bayon
Price when reviewed: £130 (£150 inc VAT)
Features & Design
Value for Money
The phrase "high definition" has now permeated the mainstream in terms of video quality, and Epson is riding on the back of that with its own brand of "Hi-Definition" photos - apparently those that "exceed lab quality". Whatever the definition, there's no doubt the quality of images from the Epson Stylus Photo PX710W is impressively high.
Its six-cartridge engine uses the company's Claria inks to good effect, with our test photo prints showing off superb detail and vibrant colours. Edges were sharp and defined, gradients were smooth, and the only major difference compared to the A-Listed Canon MP640 is the slightly lighter tone, which is a matter of preference.
Those prints come out at a decent rate, too, with a 6 x 4in best quality photo taking 1min 14secs, rising to just under two minutes for an A4 print. Its document printing is faster, with mono prints feeding out at 9ppm and colour at 5.8ppm - both quite a bit nippier than the Canon.
The compromise, as you might expect, is quality, with text not living up to those high standards. It's grey rather than black, with slightly frayed edges and an uneven look to lines of characters. Solid areas of black show up this paleness all too well, and the lack of sharpness is evident in white-on-colour text. Colours are generally accurate, though, so it won't disappoint too much as long as the photo side of things is your main priority.
The scanner is impressively sharp, albeit with slightly pale colours. This means copies look washed out, so you'll want to raise the density a little for better results. Both scans and copies are quick: a 300ppi 6 x 4in photo scanned in just 12 seconds and colour A4 copies rolled out at 5ppm.
The printer itself is flatter and lower than most. The paper tray in the base has a separate photo compartment, and prints feed onto an output tray above it that extends outwards. There's also a CD printing tray that pops out at the touch of a button. The menu system is easily navigable, even if there are a few too many buttons on the interface for our liking, and the 2.5in colour LCD is adequate.
Interestingly, buying the six inks individually from Amazon proves cheaper than buying the multipack, and will give you a mono page cost of 2p and 6.9p for colour. This low cost, along with the Wi-Fi and Ethernet connections, goes some way to compensate for the PX710W's £130 exc VAT purchase price.
But you get those connections with the Canon MP640, too, and for less. The Epson PX710W is an excellent photo printer with a very good scanner and low running costs, but its slightly iffy text output makes it less of an all-rounder. With the Canon capable of producing both top-class photos and text, we find ourselves leaning to our existing A List incumbent - but it's a close-run thing.
Author: David Bayon
I wanted to know whether it enlarges/reduces copies
By nigelgreenx on 27 Nov 2009
I just cannot believe the sheer stupidity of some people.
FINALLY epson make a printer with a flat back and no sticky-outy paper tray that can stand against the wall. And then they put all the connectors on the back. And sell it with a straight mains cable. So it still stands 10cms out from the wall. What are they thinking?
By jozmaz on 21 Dec 2009
Incredibly expensive to run
I bought this and agree that print speed is ok and print quality is excellent. However the printing costs were/are enourmous, with much of the ink being used on the head cleaning that was needed every time it was used (about every third day for occasional photos and more often 10-40 page reports). It now sits under my desk in work in case I need a standby printer.
By EngUser on 24 Dec 2011
- BBC revamps iPlayer for the "multiscreen world"
- Sony revives optical discs with 1TB Archival Disc
- Surface Power Cover finally arrives
- Mt Gox bankruptcy "leaves fox guarding the henhouse"
- iOS 7.1: what's new?
- All New HTC One: specs, release date and more
- Energy firms forced to use QR codes on bills
- Google to release "wearable" Android within a fortnight
- US cybersecurity official: What does ISP mean?
- Cameron: 5G networks will download movies in a second
- CeBit 2014 diary: Cameron comes to town
- The 5 most interesting UK businesses at SXSW
- Quickest way to upload 1GB? Hop on a train
- Move over Delia: IBM Watson is cooking tonight
- Eric Schmidt on the double-edged smartphone: friend and foe
- Getty joins the race to the bottom
- Hour of Code: five steps to learn how to code
- Sony Xperia Z2 Tablet review: first look
- Sony Xperia Z2 review: first look
- Samsung Galaxy Gear 2 review: first look
- Make the most of your mobile data
- Old-school internet scams: five that just won't die
- Bitcoin believers not worried by Mt. Gox disarray
- How to hack your car
- Small server vs cloud: which is best for SMBs?
- Block party: why do millions play Minecraft?
- What to do if you’re still on Windows XP
- Microsoft Word: top 20 secret features
- Measuring me: is your body the future of security?
- The best mobile apps for business
- Headings vs headers: how to use both in Word
- Windows Server 2012 R2: how the Datacenter edition could change SMBs
- Invoices and VAT: how to set up your documents correctly
- Nexus 5 vs Samsung Galaxy S4 Active: the best phone for avoiding screen burn
- How much is a social user worth?
- The key to choosing a secure password
- Thunderbolt Bridge: a fast Mac migration tool
- Should you advertise on Twitter?
- How to track a lost smartphone
- Self-publishing success: the best way to sell your book