Epson Stylus Photo PX710W review
Top-quality photos at fast speeds, along with a good design and low running costs. Only text lets it down
Review Date: 19 Nov 2009
Reviewed By: David Bayon
Price when reviewed: £130 (£150 inc VAT)
Features & Design
Value for Money
The phrase "high definition" has now permeated the mainstream in terms of video quality, and Epson is riding on the back of that with its own brand of "Hi-Definition" photos - apparently those that "exceed lab quality". Whatever the definition, there's no doubt the quality of images from the Epson Stylus Photo PX710W is impressively high.
Its six-cartridge engine uses the company's Claria inks to good effect, with our test photo prints showing off superb detail and vibrant colours. Edges were sharp and defined, gradients were smooth, and the only major difference compared to the A-Listed Canon MP640 is the slightly lighter tone, which is a matter of preference.
Those prints come out at a decent rate, too, with a 6 x 4in best quality photo taking 1min 14secs, rising to just under two minutes for an A4 print. Its document printing is faster, with mono prints feeding out at 9ppm and colour at 5.8ppm - both quite a bit nippier than the Canon.
The compromise, as you might expect, is quality, with text not living up to those high standards. It's grey rather than black, with slightly frayed edges and an uneven look to lines of characters. Solid areas of black show up this paleness all too well, and the lack of sharpness is evident in white-on-colour text. Colours are generally accurate, though, so it won't disappoint too much as long as the photo side of things is your main priority.
The scanner is impressively sharp, albeit with slightly pale colours. This means copies look washed out, so you'll want to raise the density a little for better results. Both scans and copies are quick: a 300ppi 6 x 4in photo scanned in just 12 seconds and colour A4 copies rolled out at 5ppm.
The printer itself is flatter and lower than most. The paper tray in the base has a separate photo compartment, and prints feed onto an output tray above it that extends outwards. There's also a CD printing tray that pops out at the touch of a button. The menu system is easily navigable, even if there are a few too many buttons on the interface for our liking, and the 2.5in colour LCD is adequate.
Interestingly, buying the six inks individually from Amazon proves cheaper than buying the multipack, and will give you a mono page cost of 2p and 6.9p for colour. This low cost, along with the Wi-Fi and Ethernet connections, goes some way to compensate for the PX710W's £130 exc VAT purchase price.
But you get those connections with the Canon MP640, too, and for less. The Epson PX710W is an excellent photo printer with a very good scanner and low running costs, but its slightly iffy text output makes it less of an all-rounder. With the Canon capable of producing both top-class photos and text, we find ourselves leaning to our existing A List incumbent - but it's a close-run thing.
Author: David Bayon
I wanted to know whether it enlarges/reduces copies
By nigelgreenx on 27 Nov 2009
I just cannot believe the sheer stupidity of some people.
FINALLY epson make a printer with a flat back and no sticky-outy paper tray that can stand against the wall. And then they put all the connectors on the back. And sell it with a straight mains cable. So it still stands 10cms out from the wall. What are they thinking?
By jozmaz on 21 Dec 2009
Incredibly expensive to run
I bought this and agree that print speed is ok and print quality is excellent. However the printing costs were/are enourmous, with much of the ink being used on the head cleaning that was needed every time it was used (about every third day for occasional photos and more often 10-40 page reports). It now sits under my desk in work in case I need a standby printer.
By EngUser on 24 Dec 2011
- Will right to be forgotten extend to Google.com?
- Samsung Gear VR uses smartphone for virtual reality
- Google X gathering medical data to build picture of health
- Amazon posts another loss - its biggest since 2012
- Google ditches OpenSSL in Chrome
- Apple and Swatch to buddy up for iWatch release
- StubHub fraud: how hackers stole $1m using tickets
- Mobile success boosts Facebook's profit by 138%
- What's on this week's PC Pro podcast?
- Unlock your Moto X with a "tattoo"
- How Google Glass ruined my lunch hour
- Smartphone battery packs: can a USB power pack beat the festival battery blues?
- Windows Easy Transfer – not so "easy" in Windows 8.1
- Formula 1: what a difference virtualisation makes
- Office of the future: comfy chairs and tablets everywhere
- I went to Glastonbury and the only thing that got high was my smartphone
- Meet the robots helping teach children
- PaperLater: would you pay to print the internet?
- Amazon vs Kobo: how much to make the ebook switch?
- Phishing emails: how I nearly got caught out
- 13 computers that changed the world
- How to download YouTube videos to a PC or laptop: is it legal to download YouTube videos?
- Hacking the Internet of Things: from smart cars to toilets
- BlackBerry Passport release date, specs, features, and rumours: when is the new BlackBerry coming out?
- What's changing in the computing curriculum
- Teaching kids to code
- Best free translation apps for iOS, Android and Windows Phone
- Five worst SMB security threats... and how to solve them
- Apple iOS vs Android vs Windows 8 – what's the best compact tablet OS?
- The 12 best tablets of 2014: what’s the best tablet on the market?
- How to add in-app purchasing to an iPhone, Android or Windows app
- Remote-control ransomware: TeamViewer and software hardball
- Why laptops with serial ports matter to the Internet of Things
- Make your mobile battery last longer
- Small steps into handling Big Data
- Nexus 5: does it really run stock Android?
- How to get broadband to a garden office
- How to write your company's IT security policy
- Raspberry Pi and Wolfram: a must-have for every child
- Could you get by with Office Web Apps?