Epson Stylus Photo PX710W review
in Printers
Verdict
Top-quality photos at fast speeds, along with a good design and low running costs. Only text lets it down
Review Date: 19 Nov 2009
Reviewed By: David Bayon
Price when reviewed: £130 (£150 inc VAT)
Features & Design
![]()
Value for Money
![]()
Performance
![]()
![]()
The phrase "high definition" has now permeated the mainstream in terms of video quality, and Epson is riding on the back of that with its own brand of "Hi-Definition" photos - apparently those that "exceed lab quality". Whatever the definition, there's no doubt the quality of images from the Epson Stylus Photo PX710W is impressively high.
Its six-cartridge engine uses the company's Claria inks to good effect, with our test photo prints showing off superb detail and vibrant colours. Edges were sharp and defined, gradients were smooth, and the only major difference compared to the A-Listed Canon MP640 is the slightly lighter tone, which is a matter of preference.
Those prints come out at a decent rate, too, with a 6 x 4in best quality photo taking 1min 14secs, rising to just under two minutes for an A4 print. Its document printing is faster, with mono prints feeding out at 9ppm and colour at 5.8ppm - both quite a bit nippier than the Canon.
The compromise, as you might expect, is quality, with text not living up to those high standards. It's grey rather than black, with slightly frayed edges and an uneven look to lines of characters. Solid areas of black show up this paleness all too well, and the lack of sharpness is evident in white-on-colour text. Colours are generally accurate, though, so it won't disappoint too much as long as the photo side of things is your main priority.
The scanner is impressively sharp, albeit with slightly pale colours. This means copies look washed out, so you'll want to raise the density a little for better results. Both scans and copies are quick: a 300ppi 6 x 4in photo scanned in just 12 seconds and colour A4 copies rolled out at 5ppm.
The printer itself is flatter and lower than most. The paper tray in the base has a separate photo compartment, and prints feed onto an output tray above it that extends outwards. There's also a CD printing tray that pops out at the touch of a button. The menu system is easily navigable, even if there are a few too many buttons on the interface for our liking, and the 2.5in colour LCD is adequate.
Interestingly, buying the six inks individually from Amazon proves cheaper than buying the multipack, and will give you a mono page cost of 2p and 6.9p for colour. This low cost, along with the Wi-Fi and Ethernet connections, goes some way to compensate for the PX710W's £130 exc VAT purchase price.
But you get those connections with the Canon MP640, too, and for less. The Epson PX710W is an excellent photo printer with a very good scanner and low running costs, but its slightly iffy text output makes it less of an all-rounder. With the Canon capable of producing both top-class photos and text, we find ourselves leaning to our existing A List incumbent - but it's a close-run thing.
Author: David Bayon
From around the web
Enlarge
I wanted to know whether it enlarges/reduces copies
By nigelgreenx on 27 Nov 2009 ![]()
stupid design
I just cannot believe the sheer stupidity of some people.
FINALLY epson make a printer with a flat back and no sticky-outy paper tray that can stand against the wall. And then they put all the connectors on the back. And sell it with a straight mains cable. So it still stands 10cms out from the wall. What are they thinking?
Obviously nothing.
By jozmaz on 21 Dec 2009 ![]()
Incredibly expensive to run
I bought this and agree that print speed is ok and print quality is excellent. However the printing costs were/are enourmous, with much of the ink being used on the head cleaning that was needed every time it was used (about every third day for occasional photos and more often 10-40 page reports). It now sits under my desk in work in case I need a standby printer.
By EngUser on 24 Dec 2011 ![]()
advertisement
- How to install Internet Explorer 9
- Maintaining and supporting IE9
- Plan your deployment
- Creating a custom browser package
- Search in corporate environments
- Apple pulls iPhones/iPads in patent dispute
- Virgin hikes prices after "free" upgrade
- Poor careers advice sees children miss out on IT jobs
- BT to offer 300Mbits/sec fibre "on demand"
- VeriSign slammed for security breach cover-up
- Megaupload bail appeal turned down
- $2.9 billion loss plunges Sony into "crisis"
- MPs attack Government scare tactics on cybercrime
- Police investigating email hacking at The Times
- Facebook IPO leaves Zuckerberg in control
- Dear Sony, Samsung and every other tech company in the world: stop trying to be Apple
- Will Apple's Final Cut Pro X update placate the pros?
- Smartr Contacts for iPhone review
- Switching to Office 365's Outlook Web App
- Amazon Kindle Fire review: first look
- Lytro light-field camera: first look
- CES: Why booth babes are bad marketing
- Ice Cream Sandwich on the Transformer Prime review: first look
- Samsung Galaxy Tab 7.7: first-look review of the best tablet at CES
- 3D printing: undeniably cool, but lacks a killer app
- How Apple lulls Mac owners into a false sense of security
- Privacy - outdated luxury or public necessity?
- Building the bionic man
- The making of open-source software
- Top 10 stupid security stories of 2011
- 10 techs to watch in 2012
- PC Pro's favourite tech products of 2011
- 10 most read articles on PC Pro in 2011
- 50 ways to make your PC better
- A licence to print anything
- The curse of sloppily written software
- Paying for your crimes with Bitcoin
- Behind the scenes: tech support for Formula 1
- The security risk of fat fingers
- Why Windows Phone 7 isn't quite ready for business
- When will Microsoft stop fiddling with Windows 8?
- Flash down the pan?
- Metro Style apps vs desktop applications
- Coping with Facebook changes
- The power of PPC
advertisement






