Skip to navigation

Kodak ESP 7 review

in Printers

Verdict

Plenty of features and simple to use, but the speed isn't matched by the print quality.

Review Date: 23 Jan 2009

Reviewed By: David Bayon

Price when reviewed: £126 (£145 inc VAT)

Overall Rating
4 stars out of 6

Features & Design
5 stars out of 6

Value for Money
4 stars out of 6

Performance
4 stars out of 6

Kodak's ESP range of all-in-one devices has always been aimed very clearly at the novice consumer. The colour cartridges come inside a single sealed compartment, and there's no mention of anything as high brow as print resolutions in the menus or on the website.

Kodak does, however, boast of the 'most intelligent paper tray system' in the industry, and while that may sound a strange claim, it turns out to be quite useful. It detects the paper size so you don't end up printing to wrong media, and there's also a sensor to measure how many sheets are in the input tray, so it can tell if a print job is going to finish or not. A built-in duplex unit further adds to the versatility.

The on-device controls aren't quite so intuitive, but neither are they the worst we've seen. A simple list menu and four-way navigation buttons mean it's not too complex to scan and copy, while the pretty driver software makes light work of printing from your PC.

Quality, on the other hand, is hit-and-miss. In our technical test text was sharp and defined, but areas of solid colour were grainy and lacked punch. Reds were orange and photos pale, while the claims of 28-second 6 x 4in photos clearly aren't achievable in the highest quality settings; it took 47 seconds to complete prints in this mode.

That's still as fast as Canon's best offerings, though, and speed on the whole is a strength. An A4 photo took under two minutes while text arrived at a more modest 5.5ppm in mono and 5.6in colour. Scans were nippy - 17s for an A4 photo at 300ppi - and the two combined for fast copying.

The enclosed cartridges make printing quite cheap too: Kodak's figures work out at under 2p per mono page and less than 5p for colour, but its claim of 6.4p per photo doesn't factor in the high cost of Kodak's Premium Ultra paper - the real cost will be closer to 40p.

All in all, though, the ESP 7 is a decent enough printer for its target audience. Those who like to print high quality photos and delve into the settings will be far better served by Canon's MP630, but if you're after simple everyday printing with a few holiday snaps on the side, the Kodak is well worth a look.

Author: David Bayon

Subscribe to PC Pro magazine. We'll give you 3 issues for £1 plus a free gift - click here

From around the web

User comments

Ink usage

This product is sold as the least expensive ink user on the market. I've managed about a dozen b&w sheets and a couple of colour images from £16 of cartridges. It appears to use ink everytime I switch on my PC, which automatically switches on the printer. Is this normal? If start up uses ink, do I really have to unplug the machine after every use to conserve ink? Comments appreciated.

By poppysmate on 6 Oct 2009

Ink usage and colour

I have recently bought this all in one printer, I like poppysmate, am disappointed with the small amount of sheets I get from my ink cartridges. I bought this printer as had a HP previously and the price of the inks was ridiculous, but now I am finding that I am buying inks for this Kodak more often than I did for the HP. Also the colour quality is awful, I am with Virgin for my phone and broadband, and when I print my bill, the Virgin logo comes out pink or lilac and not red. All in all I am very disappointed with this printer, I paid £175 for it 3 months ago from Comet. Can I just ask why Kodak decided not to include an instruction manual with it, they expect you to go on line and print it off (more ink used).

Catwoman.

By catwoman on 7 Oct 2009

Expensive to run & poor wi fi implementation

I've had this printer for over a year, and at several points when nothing has changed with my setup the wi fi stops working - the software was poorly implemented and this has shown through multiple updates being required to make it work. I feel like I've beta tested it.

Also although the ink is cheap it lasts far less time than my old HP printer, so I think it works out more expensive. Scanning is slow too.

And lastly it doesn't support Airprint, nor is there any indication from the company it will, so I'm going back to HP.

On the plus side, it looks great, and hides the paper well. Good design for sure.

By sach160 on 16 Sep 2011

Leave a comment

You need to Login or Register to comment.

(optional)

Latest Category Reviews
HP LaserJet Pro 400 MFP M475dw review

HP LaserJet Pro 400 MFP M475dw

Category: Printers
Rating: 5 out of 6
Price: £570
Dell 5330dn review

Dell 5330dn

Category: Printers
Rating: 5 out of 6
Price: £863
HP Officejet Pro 8500A Plus review

HP Officejet Pro 8500A Plus

Category: Printers
Rating: 6 out of 6
Price: £209
Dell 5230dn review

Dell 5230dn

Category: Printers
Rating: 6 out of 6
Price: £635
Epson Stylus Office BX625FWD review

Epson Stylus Office BX625FWD

Category: Printers
Rating: 4 out of 6
Price: £100
Compare reviews: Printers

advertisement

More From PC Pro
Latest Blog Posts Subscribe to our RSS Feeds

advertisement

Sponsored Links
 
 
SEARCH
SIGN UP

Your email:

Your password:

remember me

advertisement


Hitwise Top 10 Website 2010
 
 

PCPro-Computing in the Real World Printed from www.pcpro.co.uk

Register to receive our regular email newsletter at http://www.pcpro.co.uk/registration.

The newsletter contains links to our latest PC news, product reviews, features and how-to guides, plus special offers and competitions.