Skip to navigation

PCPro-Computing in the Real World Printed from www.pcpro.co.uk

Register to receive our regular email newsletter at http://www.pcpro.co.uk/registration.

The newsletter contains links to our latest PC news, product reviews, features and how-to guides, plus special offers and competitions.

Lexmark Z2320 in Printers

Verdict

A functional basic printer, but there's no need to settle for so little.

Review Date: 13 Aug 2008

Price when reviewed: £31 (£36 inc VAT)

Buy it now for: £45.68

Overall Rating
3 stars out of 6

Features & Design
2 stars out of 6

Value for Money
2 stars out of 6

Lexmark's Z2320 clearly follows the model of the Canon Pixma iP2600 - a simple, cheap device for those who just want a basic printer. It's slightly more compact than the Canon, and even less sophisticated, with a single Power button.

Considering the Z2320's rudimentary design, print quality isn't bad. Draft output was greyish, and areas of solid black came out stripey, but overall our document was legible. Stepping up to standard mode made things far more solid, but the stripes weren't eradicated, and letters were more smudged than we'd like. Still, the Z2320 isn't aimed at those who need laser-quality text. Colour graphics were smooth, if a little speckly.

Thankfully, the Z2320 put in its best performance in the test where quality counts most - photographic printing. Colours were clear, with solid blacks and subtle highlights, and detail reproduction was excellent. Our only criticisms are that dithering was noticeable in a few areas, and the overall picture wasn't quite as vibrant as other printers' efforts.

There are trade-offs, however, and the first is speed. Our 6 x 4in photograph took 2mins 10secs to print. That's not too bad next to the Epson Stylus (1min 52secs) or the Canon iP2600 (1min 42secs), but it's still the slowest time here. Draft printing was slow too, at 11.2ppm. And while the Lexmark's standard mono document rate of 7.8ppm fell in the middle of the pack, switching to colour caused this to plummet to a last-placed 1.2ppm.

Another potential gotcha is printing costs. With a pair of standard black and tri-colour cartridges we printed just 54 photos before the colour cartridge needed replacing. That works out at 30p per photo - 20% higher than the Pixma iP2600 and more than double the cost of the Canon and HP units. High-yield cartridges are offered, but Lexmark couldn't supply any for testing and won't state how much extra ink they contain.

As a basic printer the Lexmark Z2320 does a passable job. It produces readable documents and satisfactory photo-quality results. But the Canon iP2600 produces better prints, more quickly, and costs less - which leaves little to recommend the Lexmark.

Author: David Bayon

Be the first to comment this article

You need to Login or Register to comment.

(optional)

Latest Prices for 0023D0702

Seller Price Buy Now Seller Rating
Printware £45.68 Shop 0 starts out of 5
32 reviews

advertisement

Most Commented Reviews
Latest News Stories Subscribe to our RSS Feeds
Latest Blog Posts Subscribe to our RSS Feeds
Latest Features
Latest Real World Computing

advertisement

Sponsored Links
 
SEARCH
SIGN UP

Your email:

Your password:

remember me

advertisement


Hitwise Top 10 Website 2008