Skip to navigation

PCPro-Computing in the Real World Printed from www.pcpro.co.uk

Register to receive our regular email newsletter at http://www.pcpro.co.uk/registration.

The newsletter contains links to our latest PC news, product reviews, features and how-to guides, plus special offers and competitions.

Samsung 6050

Verdict

Fast printing speeds, excellent image quality and a competitive price add up to a great value machine.

Review Date: 1 May 1999

Price when reviewed: (£387 inc VAT)

Overall Rating
5 stars out of 6

PCPRO Recommended

As inkjet standards get higher, laser printer manufacturers know that to make inroads on the sub-£500 printer market they have to produce something special, or at the least very cheap.

The new office inkjet standard was set two months ago when the Epson 900 (reviewed issue 55, p168) graced these pages, hitting speeds of 12ppm and producing superb text and image quality, all for £342. Samsung is clearly taking the challenge seriously, launching a trio of new lasers at aggressive prices, and last month we were impressed enough by its 16ppm 7000N (reviewed issue 56, p166) to give it a Recommended award. As such, we had high hopes for its smaller sibling.

During installation the 6050 gives users a choice of two different languages: PCL5e and PCLXL. Using either of these languages, the 6050 matches the Epson 900 for speed when outputting a plain text 15-page document, sweeping along at 11.8ppm. To put this into perspective, all of Samsung's cheaper laser competitors come in at under 10ppm: for example, 6ppm from the £299 Panasonic KX-P6500 (reviewed issue 49, p135) and 9.5ppm from the £309 Brother HL-1050 (reviewed issue 49, p163). Tougher competition comes from the 12ppm Xerox DocuPrint P12 (reviewed issue 52, p174), but this has a more expensive list price of £499.

The choice of PCL5e or PCLXL became more important when testing the 6050 with our graphics-heavy 24-page document. When using PCL5e it managed a respectable 7.5ppm, but in PCLXL mode it failed the test entirely, stumbling one-fifth of the way through and then stopping due to a lack of memory. Even installing an extra 16Mb 72-pin SIMM into the 6050's spare memory slot couldn't persuade the printer to produce a significantly better performance. It did at least complete the test, but it did so at an unimpressive rate of 2.3ppm. The good news is that our less complex business document caused no such problems, so if your graphical expectations extend no further than charts and graphs, you can expect rates of close to 12ppm using PCL5e and 10ppm from PCLXL.

Speed, of course, isn't everything, so I was relieved to see that print quality hadn't been compromised for the sake of an extra couple of pages per minute. In fact, the 6050 produced the best quality print we've seen at this price point. Thanks to a 600 x 600dpi resolution and Samsung's excellent print engine, fonts were reproduced flawlessly even at 2pt, and shaded boxes were printed near perfectly with only hints of banding. This is true for both languages, so for general documents there's no reason to opt for the slower PCLXL.

The more advanced language is useful when reproducing complicated graphics and photographs, as it provides a well-balanced tone and doesn't share PCL5e's tendencies towards over exposure. It does lose a little detail in dark areas, though, and most images are darker than we'd like, but these criticisms pale into insignificance against the amount of banding evident in the output of printers such as the Panasonic KX-6500 and Brother HL-1050. In terms of fine detail, the 6050 produces even better images than the Xerox DocuPrint P12, which uses the much-praised Adobe PrintGear language.

The chip behind the 6050's performance is a 33MHz RISC processor, which is coupled with 4Mb of memory as standard. Memory is upgradable to a maximum of 36Mb using a standard 72-pin SIMM. There's no way of installing a network card, but you can still use the 6050 as a workgroup printer by connecting it to one PC on a network and selecting it as a shared resource. Samsung claims a 15,000 monthly duty cycle, so it should be able to cope easily with these sorts of demands.

1 2
Be the first to comment this article

You need to Login or Register to comment.

(optional)

Compare reviews: Printers

advertisement

Most Commented Reviews
Latest News Stories Subscribe to our RSS Feeds
Latest Blog Posts Subscribe to our RSS Feeds
Latest Features
Latest Real World Computing

advertisement

Sponsored Links
 
SEARCH
SIGN UP

Your email:

Your password:

remember me

advertisement


Hitwise Top 10 Website 2008