Skip to navigation

PCPro-Computing in the Real World Printed from www.pcpro.co.uk

Register to receive our regular email newsletter at http://www.pcpro.co.uk/registration.

The newsletter contains links to our latest PC news, product reviews, features and how-to guides, plus special offers and competitions.

Epson Stylus Photo 2000P

Verdict

Produces beautiful photographs with a natural sheen, but fairs less well on other tasks, lacks speed and has limited media support.

Review Date: 1 Aug 2000

Price when reviewed: (£799 inc VAT)

Overall Rating
3 stars out of 6

With photo printing a firm priority, the past few months have seen Epson pushing new print technologies closer towards the genuine article. The Stylus Photo 1270 (reviewed issue 70, p166) brought high-speed and high-quality A3+ sized photo printing, edge-to-edge prints and also boasted ten-year light-fastness using Epson's new print media. However, it now looks like the ultimate photo printer may be upon us, in the form of the very swish silver and black Stylus Photo 2000P.

This is Epson's first design to utilise six pigment-based colours, as opposed to previous dye-based inks. Pigmented inks differ from dye-based inks in that they don't dissolve completely in water, and once dry they stick to the paper's small fibres making them almost water resistant. Pigmented inks are also more resistant to fading over time since the molecules aren't as spread out as their dye-based counterparts, and so are more resistant to light. This is the main selling point of the 2000P, and Epson claims that photos printed on the new print media will remain light-fast for over 100 years.

Whether your photos will actually last this long remains to be seen, but the photo results I achieved with the 2000P were impressive. The most aesthetic part is the way in which the ink attaches itself to the paper, with no stickiness and a beautiful finish that makes it look like a genuine print - almost as though the photo was part of the paper. The prints also proved to be waterproof, and were dry within seconds of being printed. In comparison, the results from the 1270 had noticeable banding close-up, and the ink was still slightly tacky even after two months. That said, the colours produced by the 1270 were more vibrant, making those from the 2000P look slightly dull. The 1270 was also much sharper and smoother, with the 2000P looking a little grainy in comparison. The other thing to take into account is speed - the 1270 printed a high-quality A4 photo in just four minutes, 40 seconds, whereas the 2000P took 14 minutes, 40 seconds to complete the same task, and it takes 30 minutes, 40 seconds to produce an A3+ sized photo.

For the odd photo I can live with stunted print speeds, but on other tasks the 2000P fared less well. The slowest time came from the black text test on plain paper, taking 63 minutes to print just 25 pages in standard mode. This works out at a disappointing 0.4ppm, with results that are far from desirable, featuring wobbly and scratchy characters that also looked faded. The washed-out and faded appearance was followed through to all the plain paper tests. In addition to colours looking dull and faded, solid blocks looked grainy with white speckles. Ideally, you'd have to use Epson's own print media if you wanted reasonable results.

The new media comes in the form of Epson's new Premium Semigloss Photo Paper, Archival Matte Paper, and Glossy Paper - Photo Weight. These, along with plain paper, are the only four media options in the driver, with no options for previous Epson coated media. Given the poor plain paper results, this restricts the 2000P to photo printing alone, and you'll only get the 100-year light-fastness using the new media, although you can also use the Archival Matte Paper setting to print paintings on Epson's Watercolor Paper with some very attractive results.

As far as colour accuracy is concerned, the Pantone results were comparable to the balance of the 1270, which although not 100 per cent accurate is still impressive for an inkjet printer. The colour fades were slightly disappointing though, looking grainy and inconsistent in places.

1 2
Be the first to comment this article

You need to Login or Register to comment.

(optional)

advertisement

Most Commented Reviews
Latest News Stories Subscribe to our RSS Feeds
Latest Blog Posts Subscribe to our RSS Feeds
Latest Features
Latest Real World Computing

advertisement

Sponsored Links
 
SEARCH
SIGN UP

Your email:

Your password:

remember me

advertisement


Hitwise Top 10 Website 2008