Skip to navigation

PCPro-Computing in the Real World Printed from www.pcpro.co.uk

Register to receive our regular email newsletter at http://www.pcpro.co.uk/registration.

The newsletter contains links to our latest PC news, product reviews, features and how-to guides, plus special offers and competitions.

Brother HL-4040CN

Verdict

Quick, cheap to run and an abundance of features - a worthy award winner.

Review Date: 16 Jan 2008

Price when reviewed: (£318 inc VAT)

Overall Rating
5 stars out of 6

PCPRO Recommended

When it comes to producing great-value laser printers, it seems that, at least this month, Brother can't be surpassed. Its HL-5240 walked off with the award for best budget mono laser, and its colour sister - the HL-4040CN - is just as good.

It isn't the cheapest machine: £271 places it firmly in the more expensive half of the colour printer league this month. But you do get an awful lot for your money. As well as high-resolution (2,400 x 600dpi) colour printing, this printer has network connectivity with a built-in web server for monitoring consumables and changing settings remotely. It also has a tilting LCD screen, allowing quick diagnosis of network problems, and a USB socket on the front panel, which lets you print documents and images directly from a thumb drive without having to use a PC or laptop.

But it isn't just features this printer has in abundance. It's also very quick - quicker in fact than every other colour printer in this group: in our tests, it delivered 50 colour pages in a mere 2mins 43secs, just one second slower than it produced 50 pages of mono text. It's even more impressive when dealing with more complex pages, producing the photo-montage test from Photoshop in the quickest time of 48 seconds.

Running costs are good, too. Not only is there a generous allocation of toner out of the box - 2,500 mono pages and 1,500 colour pages - but our analysis shows that the longer you own this printer, the cheaper it becomes. Overall, it's the cheapest to run in this section.

It isn't quite perfect, though. In terms of output quality, we found that colour accuracy using the default settings wasn't very good: flesh tones looked yellow, and other colours were washed out. It isn't poor, though, by any means and good scores for text quality and detail meant it was still among the better colour machines on test.

We had to give both this Brother and the Lexmark C530dn awards because the scores were so close, but they do offer very different packages. If you're after the best image quality and duplex printing, choose the Lexmark, but choose this Brother if speed and low running costs are your main priority.

Author: Darien Graham-Smith

Be the first to comment this article

You need to Login or Register to comment.

(optional)

advertisement

Most Commented Reviews
Latest News Stories Subscribe to our RSS Feeds
Latest Blog Posts Subscribe to our RSS Feeds
Latest Features
Latest Real World Computing

advertisement

Sponsored Links
 
SEARCH
SIGN UP

Your email:

Your password:

remember me

advertisement


Hitwise Top 10 Website 2008