Skip to navigation

Google Picasa 3.5

  • Google Picasa 3.5
  • Google Picasa 3.5
  • Google Picasa 3.5

Verdict

Easy-to-use tagging capabilities including advanced and effective face recognition take Picasa 3.5 to the next level

Review Date: 21 Oct 2009

Price when reviewed:

Overall Rating
5 stars out of 6

PCPRO Recommended

The third tab, People, is the most impressive by far. Leave Picasa 3.5 open overnight and it will get to work analysing your photos, pulling out and identifying faces. Next morning it will present a selection of faces organised into expandable groups. If a face is of someone important to you, simply type in that person's name to create a face tag. This appears as an album in a new People section in the left-hand navigation panel. Leave Picasa to work again and, when you next click on your face tag, you’ll find a selection of suggested matches you can quickly dismiss or confirm.

The big question is how good is the recognition? The answer is astonishingly good, at least for adults. Working through a collection of 60,000 images, Picasa 3.5 identified over 500 shots of one person without making a single false suggestion. Unfortunately, the hit rate falls quickly for children and especially babies, but that's hardly surprising as their faces have fewer distinct features and change significantly over time. Even with the lower accuracy, however, you can quickly work through hundreds of suggestions and even enjoy the process.

It's important not to get the wrong idea about what Picasa 3.5's face tagging can do. Google's technology is stunning but face identification is never going to be perfect. It can only try to work on clearly recognisable, more-or-less full-on faces, which are generally the exception rather than the rule. In short, Picasa 3.5 can’t automatically find every picture in which a particular person appears.

Instead, what face tagging offers is a reasonable and useful stab at people recognition for those users who accept that they’re never going to have the time or inclination to work through their entire collection manually tagging every photo. More than this, face tagging offers a completely new entry route to your photos.

Last month we looked at Adobe Photoshop Elements 8 and its new face tagging system and came away unconvinced. With Picasa 3.5 we've been completely converted. That's partly down to the fact that Google's face identification and matching are far more accurate than Adobe's, but the major difference is the overall approach. With Elements 8 face tagging feels like another image-handling chore; with Picasa 3.5 it's fast and fun.

While its editing capabilities are comparatively limited, thanks to its live search, web albums and simple new map referencing and face tagging, Google Picasa 3.5 is the best choice available to help you master your digital photos and, more importantly, to enjoy them. And the fact that it's free is a major bonus.

Author: Tom Arah

1 2
User comments

It's astonishing

Whilst I agree about the babies thing (it couldn't tell the difference between my two boys when they were similar ages - then again, I had to check the dates the pics were taken) I'd have to disagree about the full-face from the front thing.

It's picked out partial shots and side on shots brilliantly. But most impressively, I took a photo of the boys at an aquarium. It picked out my face in the reflection of the tank - which I had never noticed was there before.

By Bassey1976 on 21 Oct 2009

Maybe....

....you just look like a fish.

By Mark_Thompson on 21 Oct 2009

^^^
LOL

By nicomo on 21 Oct 2009

I did find it picked up a number of faces from photos on the wall in the background of one set of photos.

By simbr on 22 Oct 2009

Picasa's Shortcomings

It's a pity that this review didn't manage to look beyond Picasa's admittedly flashy interface to see some of the shortcomings beneath. For example:

1) Picasa's tagging uses an obsolete standard (IPTC-IIM) instead of the current IPTC Core, which is based on XMP (and which Windows Live Photo Gallery uses).

2) Picasa stores the face recognition information inside its database, which resides on your PC. This makes it a single point of failure, as well as being difficult to share. Other applications (e.g. Windows Live Photo Gallery) use XMP to store the face recognition metadata within the images themselves, making it easier to share the information.

By gcoupe on 23 Oct 2009

Actually started playing with this last night - have to admit its really fun - the face recognition technology is brilliant - I hope they can develop this further so that it may be used for other things, like landscapes that change over time, buildings being built and so fourth.

By nicomo on 24 Oct 2009

Leave a comment

You need to Login or Register to comment.

(optional)

advertisement

Most Commented Reviews
Latest News Stories Subscribe to our RSS Feeds
Latest Blog Posts Subscribe to our RSS Feeds
Latest Features
Latest Real World Computing

advertisement

Sponsored Links
 
SEARCH
SIGN UP

Your email:

Your password:

remember me

advertisement


Hitwise Top 10 Website 2008
 
 

PCPro-Computing in the Real World Printed from www.pcpro.co.uk

Register to receive our regular email newsletter at http://www.pcpro.co.uk/registration.

The newsletter contains links to our latest PC news, product reviews, features and how-to guides, plus special offers and competitions.