Skip to navigation

Konica QM-200 review

Verdict

Despite its nifty motor-driven lens cover, the Konica's lacklustre image quality means it fails to impress.

Review Date: 1 Nov 1999

Price when reviewed: (£645 inc VAT) street price £379 (£445 inc VAT)

Overall Rating
2 stars out of 6

Konica's expertise in imaging technology spans a range of applications, with conventional photography at one end and X-ray films for medical diagnostic systems at the other. This might explain the clinical look of the boxy Konica, which has a retro, 1970s feel to it.

The QM-200 sits at the top of Konica's digital cameras range. It uses CompactFlash memory technology, and you'll find an 8Mb card in the box. The camera sports a 2.11 million CCD, which equates to a maximum resolution of 1,600 x 1,200, and its images are stored in compressed JPEG format.

The QM-200's lens cover, which hides both the lens and the flash, attracted our attention during testing. When you switch it on it slides down with a loud whirr. However, our initial enthusiasm died down once we realised that unless you already have the camera turned on, this would make it unsuitable for quick reaction shots.

The Konica felt slow in other areas too. The LCD update rate, for instance, was one of the poorest on test, and the images were unclear. Pressing the shutter halfway freezes the image in the LCD, and a further press is needed to actually take the picture. The Konica has a unique style of replaying pictures, presenting a thumbnail of the previous and next images within the one you're currently viewing. It's also possible to zoom in, pan around the picture and rotate it for easier viewing.

On the positive side, the Konica draws its power from a lithium ion rechargeable battery. It can also take standard alkaline AA batteries - handy if you run out of power when on the move.

Disappointingly, though, the Konica was not equipped with USB so you'll need to be patient while your images inch their way over the 115Kbits/sec serial link to your PC.

Overall, the QM-200's inability to resolve detail and its poor treatment of colour placed it only 13th in the rankings. If you're looking for a sub-£400 camera, the Canon PowerShot A50 is a better bet.

Subscribe to PC Pro magazine. We'll give you 3 issues for £1 plus a free gift - click here

From around the web

Be the first to comment this article

You need to Login or Register to comment.

(optional)

Latest Peripherals Reviews
Nokia Lumia 710 review

Nokia Lumia 710

Category: Smartphones
Rating: 4 out of 6
Price: £300
Sony Alpha NEX-7 review

Sony Alpha NEX-7

Category: Digital cameras
Rating: 4 out of 6
Price: £1,129
Philips E-line 237E3QPHSU review

Philips E-line 237E3QPHSU

Category: Monitors
Rating: 3 out of 6
Price: £150
Oki MC851dn review

Oki MC851dn

Category: Printers
Rating: 5 out of 6
Price: £2,330
Viewsonic VP2365-LED review

Viewsonic VP2365-LED

Category: Monitors
Rating: 4 out of 6
Price: £204

advertisement

Most Commented Reviews
More From PC Pro
Internet Explorer 9 Resources
Latest News Stories Subscribe to our RSS Feeds
Latest Blog Posts Subscribe to our RSS Feeds
Latest Features
Latest Real World Computing

advertisement

Sponsored Links
 
 
SEARCH
SIGN UP

Your email:

Your password:

remember me

advertisement


Hitwise Top 10 Website 2010
 
 

PCPro-Computing in the Real World Printed from www.pcpro.co.uk

Register to receive our regular email newsletter at http://www.pcpro.co.uk/registration.

The newsletter contains links to our latest PC news, product reviews, features and how-to guides, plus special offers and competitions.