Skip to navigation

Samsung S85 review

Verdict

Review Date: 12 Nov 2007

Reviewed By: Jonathan Bray

Price when reviewed: (£110 inc VAT)

Overall Rating
2 stars out of 6

Those in the market for a digital camera have never had it so good. There are some spectacular models around for less than £100, but don't be swayed by the headline statistics - lots of megapixels and a big TFT don't necessarily a good camera make. We've tested five models from the top manufacturers, assessing everything from image quality to how they handle. Can you get away with a bargain, or is it always worth paying more?

With its 8.2-megapixel sensor and 5x optical zoom, the S85 is a well-specified camera for less than £100, but in use proved to be only middle of the pack. Image quality is good, but not the best. It has fewer megapixels on the same-sized sensor as the Nikon S200, which theoretically means lower noise. In fact, the S85 proved worse when it came to digital noise, and was also poorer at detail resolution. Distant brickwork melds into a mottled red, and important details can be lost altogether when the ISO goes much beyond 400. It isn't catastrophically bad, but it's a long way from the excellence of the front-running Canon and Nikon models.

There are other features worth thinking about, though. It comes with rechargeable AA batteries, plus a charger: if the batteries run out in the middle of nowhere it's possible to pop in non-rechargeables - not something you can say about most lithium-ion cameras. We also like the 2.5in TFT, which is good for framing and reviewing shots, and the S85 is also unusual in that it offers full manual control. In this mode, shutter speeds can be set from 1/2,000th of a second to 15 seconds, and there are two stops of aperture available: f/4.9 and f/2.8. But, as an overall package, it just doesn't hang together as well as the Nikon or Canon.

The plastic body doesn't sit as comfortably in the hands as those of some of the slimmer cameras - Samsung's attempt at a hand grip results in a ridge that's uncomfortable to hold for extended periods of time. Add in the disappointing image quality and, while the Samsung might be decent for occasional use, it's comprehensively beaten by its competitors at this price.

Author: Jonathan Bray

Subscribe to PC Pro magazine. We'll give you 3 issues for £1 plus a free gift - click here

From around the web

Be the first to comment this article

You need to Login or Register to comment.

(optional)

Latest Peripherals Reviews
GoPro HD Hero2 review

GoPro HD Hero2

Category: Peripherals
Rating: 5 out of 6
Price: £294
Nokia Lumia 710 review

Nokia Lumia 710

Category: Smartphones
Rating: 4 out of 6
Price: £300
Sony Alpha NEX-7 review

Sony Alpha NEX-7

Category: Digital cameras
Rating: 4 out of 6
Price: £1,129
Philips E-line 237E3QPHSU review

Philips E-line 237E3QPHSU

Category: Monitors
Rating: 3 out of 6
Price: £150
Oki MC851dn review

Oki MC851dn

Category: Printers
Rating: 5 out of 6
Price: £2,330

advertisement

Most Commented Reviews
More From PC Pro
Internet Explorer 9 Resources
Latest News Stories Subscribe to our RSS Feeds
Latest Blog Posts Subscribe to our RSS Feeds
Latest Features
Latest Real World Computing

advertisement

Sponsored Links
 
 
SEARCH
SIGN UP

Your email:

Your password:

remember me

advertisement


Hitwise Top 10 Website 2010
 
 

PCPro-Computing in the Real World Printed from www.pcpro.co.uk

Register to receive our regular email newsletter at http://www.pcpro.co.uk/registration.

The newsletter contains links to our latest PC news, product reviews, features and how-to guides, plus special offers and competitions.