Skip to navigation

Nikon D40x review

Verdict

An ideal first DSLR thanks to onscreen help. It takes great shots and the battery lasts for ages.

Review Date: 21 Jun 2007

Reviewed By: Jim Martin

Price when reviewed: (£499 inc VAT)

Overall Rating
5 stars out of 6

Just four months ago, we looked at the D40 and it's already old news. The D40x is the new kid on the block and makes a huge leap from 6 to 10 megapixels. This, and the pricing, put it in direct competition with Canon's EOS 400D.

Nikon hasn't changed much apart from the CCD, though. The body is identical to the D40's, being virtually the same size and weight as the 400D. The 400D and D40x both have an 18-55mm kit lens too, although the D40x still lacks an integral focus motor, so can only auto focus using lenses with their own motors - the AF-S and AF-I ranges.

The other difference from the 400D is that the D40x is clearly aimed at DSLR novices. Like the 400D, there's no separate status LCD, so all settings that aren't shown in the viewfinder have to be relayed on the 2.5in rear TFT. This is a much slower process than using the LCD of the D80 or Pentax K10D. But the extra space and resolution mean there's room for helpful photos by each setting, showing the most appropriate value for each type of scene.

Despite this, the resulting photos we took were a shade ahead of the Canon's. As usual, Nikon's kit lens proved slightly sharper than Canon's, and that led to marginally better detail. Macro abilities are similar, allowing you to get within 30cm of your subject. In low light, the D40x's AF-assist lamp was a big help, and it also produced a more pleasing night shot. Noise was kept at bay in low light, and there's an ISO 3,200-equivalent mode for extreme low-light shooting.

Many will appreciate that the D40x has a better continuous mode than the D40 - we measured it at 2.7fps, identical to the 400D. Conversely, many will mourn the absence of exposure bracketing, even if there's a useful flash compensation setting. But, the D40x scores for its spot-metering mode and the use of SD cards rather than Canon's CompactFlash. There's also the fact that it comes with a full printed manual, while the 400D has only a quick-start guide.

Ultimately, it's difficult to choose between the two cameras. Both are capable of great photos for the money, but the D40x will appeal more to novices, while the 400D is better suited to seasoned SLR users who can't live without the extra shooting features.

Author: Jim Martin

Subscribe to PC Pro magazine. We'll give you 3 issues for £1 plus a free gift - click here

From around the web

Be the first to comment this article

You need to Login or Register to comment.

(optional)

Latest Category Reviews
APC Smart-UPS 1500 LCD review

APC Smart-UPS 1500 LCD

Category: UPSs
Rating: 5 out of 6
Price: £479
Tripp-Lite SmartPro SMX1500SLT review

Tripp-Lite SmartPro SMX1500SLT

Category: UPSs
Rating: 4 out of 6
Price: £364
Motorola Motoluxe review

Motorola Motoluxe

Category: Smartphones
Rating: 3 out of 6
Price: £190
Synology DS212j review

Synology DS212j

Category: Storage appliances
Rating: 5 out of 6
Price: £160
HP LaserJet Pro 400 MFP M475dw review

HP LaserJet Pro 400 MFP M475dw

Category: Printers
Rating: 5 out of 6
Price: £570

advertisement

Most Commented Reviews
More From PC Pro
Latest News Stories Subscribe to our RSS Feeds
Latest Blog Posts Subscribe to our RSS Feeds
Latest Features
Latest Real World Computing

advertisement

Sponsored Links
 
 
SEARCH
SIGN UP

Your email:

Your password:

remember me

advertisement


Hitwise Top 10 Website 2010
 
 

PCPro-Computing in the Real World Printed from www.pcpro.co.uk

Register to receive our regular email newsletter at http://www.pcpro.co.uk/registration.

The newsletter contains links to our latest PC news, product reviews, features and how-to guides, plus special offers and competitions.